- Joined
- Jan 13, 2022
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? Why do you think AI help humanity?AI is good for greater good
A lot of things, literally i can make a very big list, just made it quick, it's just a very good Google who is much faster and more valuable in the long run.Really? Why do you think AI help humanity?
Saying AI is just a good Google is oversimplifying. LLMs like ChatGPT are just a small subset of AI. I do find them useful at times, even if they're overhyped. They're probably the most benign form of AI and even then I can name many issues with them. They're ruining our education systems (we'll see the effects in 5-10 years), discouraging thinking, (still) giving incorrect information, and providing false companionship that's no substitute for human connection.A lot of things, literally i can make a very big list, just made it quick, it's just a very good Google who is much faster and more valuable in the long run.
A.I is fake and gay, It's just like the Blockchain hype back in 2015-2019You should be really worried about AGI, the end goal of AI research. Almost everyone will be made redundant, and if governments like the US have their way (Big Beautiful Bill), those that control AGI models will have all the power. Humanity as we know it will be over and it's not an exaggeration. You will become useless and powerless.
LLMs are overhyped. True AI (AGI) doesn't exist yet, but most researchers say it's possible. It's a matter of if not when. It could be 5 years, it could be 10, it could be 50 we don't really know. But when it comes, it'll eventually take most jobs and make everyone dependent on government handouts, with the power balance shifting completely to corporations.A.I is fake and gay, It's just like the Blockchain hype back in 2015-2019
You should be really worried about AGI, the end goal of AI research.
AGI is just a fantasy scenario that will never occur, like antigravity technology or perpetual motion machines. The entire current approach to "AI" with LLMs is fundamentally incompatible with a rational computer intelligence. LLMs can't think rationally, they don't fundamentally know what truth is, they don't even have real memory. You could put the sum total of all human scientific knowledge on a single IKEA bookshelf, and if given enough time, a single human could learn all of that information. A LLM can't figure out anything without having the entire Internet at it's disposal, and even then, researchers complain that the Internet doesn't contain enough information for them to use.LLMs are overhyped. True AI (AGI) doesn't exist yet, but most researchers say it's possible. It's a matter of if not when. It could be 5 years, it could be 10, it could be 50 we don't really know. But when it comes, it'll eventually take most jobs and make everyone dependent on government handouts, with the power balance shifting completely to corporations.
Yes, we won't reach AGI by scaling LLMs. We'll find some other path, maybe using technologies that don't exist yet. It's likely far away, contrary to what publicly-traded tech companies are saying. But basically every leading AI researcher says it's possible and will happen eventually.AGI is just a fantasy scenario that will never occur, like antigravity technology or perpetual motion machines. The entire current approach to "AI" with LLMs is fundamentally incompatible with a rational computer intelligence.
I have a running theory that the people who generate and post these photos are among the percentage of the population who cannot form complex mental images. For example, the people genning images of Nick Rekieta's house from the eyewitness reports of the bodycam. I read the transcripts too. I really don't understand why people do it as it adds absolutely nothing to a conversation besides taking up bandwidth. Wow! Here's an image of what a computer thinks the Balldo Dungeon looks like, that's cool I guess but I want to see what it actually looks like.have a pathetic "look what I made" post because they uploaded a photo into a meme generator.
I have a running theory that the people who generate and post these photos are among the percentage of the population who cannot form complex mental images.
This is why I think we should start using the term NPC (Non Player Character) very seriously when talking about these slaves to technology. They aren't people anymore, they have lost their animus. Given it away with a false pride it seems even. All for the illusion of safety. I never thought we'd see the day where people would willingly walk into the fire to become the shadows they see on the wall. Maybe a bit too philosophical but since this is as much a sociological problem I think some philosophy is warranted to try and understand how to deal with these NPC's.Woe to the man who surrenders his mind to thinking machines. They will live as a slave to the will of those men who contol the machines. Their learning commanded by the machines, their art commanded by the machines, their speech commanded by the machines.
Thou shalt not make a machine in the image of a mans mind. This is the first and greatest command.
It’s almost funny how the loudest critics of societal decay the "traditionalists" who romanticize the 1950s, rage against "woke culture," and claim to hate participation trophies and DEI hires are the same people uncritically cheering for AI. They don’t seem to realize that AI isn’t some organic, inevitable force; it’s a tool being aggressively funded and shaped by the exact same profit-obsessed systems they claim to despise. The irony? They’re so busy pretending AI is pure, merit-based progress that they don’t see they’re participating in the ultimate participation trophy: handing unchecked power to corporations while calling it "innovation." Playing into the hands that have made any semblance of a traditional life impossible. That have made an affordable life, at least in the west, impossible. Even further to an extent.This is why I think we should start using the term NPC (Non Player Character) very seriously when talking about these slaves to technology. They aren't people anymore, they have lost their animus. Given it away with a false pride it seems even. All for the illusion of safety. I never thought we'd see the day where people would willingly walk into the fire to become the shadows they see on the wall. Maybe a bit too philosophical but since this is as much a sociological problem I think some philosophy is warranted to try and understand how to deal with these NPC's.