EU [The Berlin Administrative Court] declares border returns illegal - "Anyone who applies for asylum at a border control on German territory may not simply be turned back [...] However, the court also ruled that migrants cannot demand to travel further inland.""


Translated from German:

The Berlin Administrative Court has ruled in several summary proceedings: Anyone who applies for asylum at a border control on German territory may not simply be turned back - the so-called Dublin procedure must first be carried out in order to clarify which EU state is responsible for the asylum procedure.

Three Somalis, two men and one woman, had filed a complaint. They arrived in Germany by train from Poland on May 9 and applied for asylum. The federal police checked them at Frankfurt (Oder) station and sent them back to Poland on the same day.

The reason given was that they had entered the country from a safe third country. The applicants, who are currently residing in Poland, filed urgent applications against this.

According to a court spokeswoman, this is the first court decision on the new regulations introduced by Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (54, CSU). These stricter rules have been in force since May 7. Dobrindt had decreed them just a few hours after taking office. At the same time, he ordered that asylum seekers can also be turned back at the border.

However, the court also ruled that migrants cannot demand to travel further inland. It is also possible to carry out the Dublin procedure at or near the border.

For asylum expert Philipp Pruy (38), the urgent decision by the Berlin Administrative Court came as anything but a surprise: “It was foreseeable that administrative courts would overturn the new regulation on blanket refoulement, given the situation under European law.”

According to the established case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), refoulement of asylum seekers at the EU's internal border is regularly unlawful. This was most recently confirmed by the ECJ in its ruling of 21.09.2023 (Ref.: C.143/22).

Migration expert Pruy explains to BILD: “After an asylum application, a Dublin procedure must regularly be initiated, after which a return decision with a deadline for voluntary departure can be issued.” According to the lawyer, the BMI's new policy of rejecting asylum applications across the board and simply skipping the established Dublin procedure is therefore clearly contrary to European law under the current legal situation.

What is the Dublin procedure?
This is a European Union (EU) procedure that regulates which European country is responsible for a refugee's asylum procedure. This is usually the country where the refugee first entered the country. This applies, for example, to boat refugees who reach the shores of Italy via the Mediterranean. Or - as in the case of Solingen attacker Issa al Hasan - “protection seekers” who enter the EU via the Bulgarian-Turkish border. They have to apply for asylum there.
 
Why was the endless mass immigration of Current Year even began in the first place?

:thinking:
Because diversity is our strength
My pet theory is that because German women want to get dicked by arab dick. You call it "Mutt's Law", I call it "Mutt's Facts", most people in the early days who held "refugees welcome" signs were indeed young women. There is no other logical reason to flood your country with that many military aged foreign males except to outbreed the other men.
 
most people in the early days who held "refugees welcome" signs were indeed young women
Ironic, as young women there now feel threatened by "refugees" hitting on them -- and even harassing them -- to that point where they are now starting to dress like Muslims.
 
Why was the endless mass immigration of Current Year even began in the first place?

:thinking:
I'm only aware of Canada's unlimited immigration crap starting.
Justin Castro Trudeau cried about the Michael Brown shooting back in 2014 and campaigned on, "we must show America how not racist we are", and here we are today with leafland full of pajeets and niggers. Must've been the same thing going on in Europe when the BLM nigger riots were new and young but I only remember them crying about how we're evil and trying to shame us for owning guns and not liking fags.
 
Because diversity is our strength
I remember a study made by the poster boy of "diversity is our strength" and it turned out his study proved the opposite. Does anybody know what I'm talking about? Have wanted to look deeper into it for a while but can't remember names.
 
I distinctly remember mutti merkel saying to a young Palestinian girl ‘we can’t take you all’ and then suddenly after that Germany decided that yes actually it could.
We need to reverse it or we are doomed
 
It's strange how very few people seem to be noticing that it impacted only western countries exclusively at the exact same time. Surely someone can leak the WEF plans or whoever the fuck drew this up? Or are we still pretending that's a racist conspiracy theory?
to be fair, the amount that reached europe is only a fraction of those that fled their shithole countries. places like turkey and iran and the arab north african countries didn't just shuffle them all through, they all have significant rapefugee populations
 
We need to reverse it or we are doomed
Little late for that, I'm afraid. Europe had it's last generation of pure white homogeny, well unless you lived in a place like France or UK in which case you were already fucked.
It's strange how very few people seem to be noticing that it impacted only western countries exclusively at the exact same time. Surely someone can leak the WEF plans or whoever the fuck drew this up? Or are we still pretending that's a racist conspiracy theory?
Well, they're called "refugees", I believe the official excuse was the old and tried "14 photos that will make you say fuck having laws and borders and shit". The excuse was the war in Syria, which I don't recall anyone I knew of(euro or otherwise) gave a shit about, except a few people who were feverish /sg/ posters on /pol/.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daily Happenings
However, the court also ruled that migrants cannot demand to travel further inland. It is also possible to carry out the Dublin procedure at or near the border.
The Romans had a similar 'procedure' for the Goths.

How did that work out for them?
1748955200060.webp
 
Back