Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I'll say it:
Nick's probably molesting his daughters

The signs are all there and the worst case scenario is usually true when it comes to Nick
Until there is actual evidence, one ought to refrain from making that leap.

Is Nick capable of it? I think so, but we do not have actual evidence.

Personally, I think Nick is a scumbag who hates his family. On that, we have evidence ranging from his statements to his on camera disdain.
 
I'll say it:
Nick's probably molesting his daughters

The signs are all there and the worst case scenario is usually true when it comes to Nick
Not nearly enough evidence to come to this conclusion, playa.
All this post does is give Nick a reason to point and say "See? They call me a pedophile too! That makes it okay!"

The company he keeps isn't to be ignored, but I'll believe it when I see some harder evidence.
 
I'll say it:
Nick's probably molesting his daughters

The signs are all there and the worst case scenario is usually true when it comes to Nick
I want to confront the disagreers on this...

How does this NOT look concerning?
1. Nick is close friends with multiple people who routinely sexualize minors - Melton, Vito, Drex who actually groomed a minor.
2. Nick romanticizes a movie that culminates in almost taking a teen girl's virginity.
3. Nick describes his children as objects of sexual desire, couched in accusation toward others.
4. Nick's 9 year old has been said to have behavioral problems like aggression and night terrors.
5. Aforementioned daughter is 'his favorite'.
6. Per bodycam, no delineation in the house between adult areas and children areas. Children's toys sitting next to drugs and sex toys.
7. Nick is proud of sexual activities that physically violate or harm women, like fucking April bloody.
8. The favorite daughter was the only who tested positive for 'regular user' levels of cocaine.

At minimum, he is HIGHLY suspect of deviant thoughts in this regard. I'd love to be wrong but the signs are overwhelming.

ETA: No accusation, summary of facts that Nick has provided.
 
Last edited:
You guys are right about there being no hard evidence to come to that conclusion, so I'm going to delete it to be safe. I jumped the gun and said something that we have no evidence of.

Nick still talks creepily about his daughters and I hope the worst case scenario doesn't turn out true for once
 
It's still incredibly defamatory. Most of the people the farms calls pedos could sue except for the fact that they are to a man actual pedos it seems who don't want to be exposed.
How exactly do you sue anonymous web forum users? If that were the case this website couldn't exist. 50% of the threads here are alleged pedophiles.
 
I want to confront the disagreers on this...

How does this NOT look concerning?
1. Nick is close friends with multiple people who routinely sexualize minors - Melton, Vito, Drex who actually groomed a minor.
2. Nick romanticizes a movie that culminates in almost taking a teen girl's virginity.
3. Nick describes his children as objects of sexual desire, couched in accusation toward others.
4. Nick's 9 year old has been said to have behavioral problems like aggression and night terrors.
5. Aforementioned daughter is 'his favorite'.
6. Per bodycam, no delineation in the house between adult areas and children areas. Children's toys sitting next to drugs and sex toys.
7. Nick is proud of sexual activities that physically violate or harm women, like fucking April bloody.
8. The favorite daughter was the only who tested positive for 'regular user' levels of cocaine.

At minimum, he is HIGHLY suspect of victimizing that 9 year old. I'd love to be wrong but the signs are overwhelming.

It's just a retarded thing to write on this forum. Thinking it's true is fine, writing it here and now is retarded for several reasons that you should really try to come up with on your own.
 
It's just a retarded thing to write on this forum. Thinking it's true is fine, writing it here and now is retarded for several reasons that you should really try to come up with on your own.
If Nick wants to screenshot what I said and cry on Twitter about it, he's going to have to address the information presented. I'm identifying a pattern of behavior that correlates with child abuse, which he has provided all the details of himself.
 
I don't know, maybe my t-14 law degree isn't worth all that much for knowing the law.
I respect your opinion but I don't agree that 'this pattern of behavior is concerning' is some kind of actionable defamation. Again, this forum wouldn't exist if it was. This discussion surrounds lolcows all the time, especially in the furry subforum.
 
Back