/horror/ general megathread - Let's talk about movies and shit.

The novelization of the third Final Destination movie is a pretty accurate retelling of the third movie until it goes full on fanfiction for some reason during the scene that happened off camera between when the jock's head splatters, and they get out of the car with the change of clothes.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: frozen_runner
The novelization of the third Final Destination movie is a pretty accurate retelling of the third movie until it goes full on fanfiction for some reason during the scene that happened off camera between when the jock's head splatters, and they get out of the car with the change of clothes.
Don't a lot of these novelizations get written while the movie is still in production? I think the novel authors will usually get access to the scripts at the time, but scripts also change a lot during the shooting of a film. That could explain a lot of the differences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: XYZpdq Jr.
The novelization of the third Final Destination movie is a pretty accurate retelling of the third movie until it goes full on fanfiction for some reason during the scene that happened off camera between when the jock's head splatters, and they get out of the car with the change of clothes.

What changes ? Im curious now

F.D in other medias can get surprisingly creative/bonkers.
Don't a lot of these novelizations get written while the movie is still in production? I think the novel authors will usually get access to the scripts at the time, but scripts also change a lot during the shooting of a film. That could explain a lot of the differences.

Novelizations also tend to add things that werent in the movie, like deleted scenes and scenes that were left on the cutting room floor for whatever reason.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: frozen_runner
Don't a lot of these novelizations get written while the movie is still in production? I think the novel authors will usually get access to the scripts at the time, but scripts also change a lot during the shooting of a film. That could explain a lot of the differences.
I think most go by a script if they plan the tie-in book to come out when the movie does. The Alien movie novelization goes by the director's cut and actually carries the kidnapping and encasing the the Xenomorph does in the director's cut through the next two books (even though it doesn't happen in those movies. The Resident Evil novels the first couple that are direct adaptations of the first games, but then if you were reading them in real time as the games came out, the original Resident Evil 3 Nemesis felt like the game makers read her books and did the exact opposite of what happened. The adaptations also got re-written to include things they added in with the first HD update. No idea if the others are accurate - the novel series ended up being a weird amalgamation of the games and the first movie series.

But Final Destination 3 is full on hot and heavy in the shower right between the jock's head popping and the car, as I said. It goes on for like 3 pages. If you recall it's the main character and her boyfriend's (RIP) best friend. from what I recall there isn't any sort of tension that was in the rest of the book or even in the movie. A complete tone change. Like a whole section of a different book was entered in. The novelization did come out a month before the movie sox you're probably right with this one.

If it was a plan to have them get together in the movie, I'm glad they didn't go there in the final version.
What changes ? Im curious now
I just remember that scene. I could probably find more if I went through both but that's the only thing that sticks out.

Apparently it's normal for movie novelizations to come out a month before the movie. Probably to build up hype?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: frozen_runner
What changes ? Im curious now

F.D in other medias can get surprisingly creative/bonkers.


Novelizations also tend to add things that werent in the movie, like deleted scenes and scenes that were left on the cutting room floor for whatever reason.
The novelization of Gremlins 2 opens on a fucking alien volcano planet. Borrowed it from a classroom library when I was maybe 10 and that’s literally all I remember about the book.
 
The novelization of Gremlins 2 opens on a fucking alien volcano planet. Borrowed it from a classroom library when I was maybe 10 and that’s literally all I remember about the book.
David Bischoff: "So, Joe, do you have any requests for the novel before I get started on it? Like, how creative can I get?"

Joe Dante: "Who gives a fuck?"
 
The novelization of Gremlins 2 opens on a fucking alien volcano planet. Borrowed it from a classroom library when I was maybe 10 and that’s literally all I remember about the book.
I used to have the novelization of the first Gremlins, and it gave a full explanation, with flashbacks to the alien world where they came from, of how and why the Mogwai were created, as well as an explanation for why Stripe destroyed some of the eggs when more were being hatched, the aftermath of which is visible in the movie in a couple of shots.
 
Don't a lot of these novelizations get written while the movie is still in production? I think the novel authors will usually get access to the scripts at the time, but scripts also change a lot during the shooting of a film. That could explain a lot of the differences.

Novelizations also tend to add things that werent in the movie, like deleted scenes and scenes that were left on the cutting room floor for whatever reason.

Mentor of mine has done novelizations for several big budget, recent superhero films and extremely popular shows. For films, they are allowed to see the script and in some cases they get to see rough footage (which can be why deleted scenes might be canon in the film novelization). They are given some degree of creative freedom but it varies by project. For shows, they are obviously referencing past material and the showrunners may give them some insight on future plans for the show or may just tell them to run wild.

It's made way more overt in part 2.

They're highschoolers but still, ew.
 
Guillermo Del Toro is doing Frankenstein:
Apparently its one of his dream projects so I hope its good.
lmao@1:52 where he ninja flips the guy and he floats away like a ceiling vent caught him. Even it copies the book's plot 1:1, this is not the tone I want in a Frankenstein. tbh, the book is great, but I already read it, I don't need to watch it, so yeah, screw book-accuracy. Best Frankensteins are the Universal one, the Hammer one, etc.

Novelizations also tend to add things that werent in the movie, like deleted scenes and scenes that were left on the cutting room floor for whatever reason.
I have read a couple that apparently realized the script wasn't going to fill out a novel and just made up extraneous stuff to pad it out. On a mostly-unrelated note, I read Brad Carter's fairly recent novelization of killer bigfoot movie Night of the Demon, and I thought it was actually pretty well-done, not at all the meme gag I was expecting. He filled out the (very thin) plot of the movie with more gore, sex, and a giant conspiracy. And character development, I guess. But apparently Severin is funding a bunch of these things. I wouldn't mind reading his take on Rats: Night of Terror or Hell of the Living Dead.
 
I have read a couple that apparently realized the script wasn't going to fill out a novel and just made up extraneous stuff to pad it out. On a mostly-unrelated note, I read Brad Carter's fairly recent novelization of killer bigfoot movie Night of the Demon, and I thought it was actually pretty well-done, not at all the meme gag I was expecting. He filled out the (very thin) plot of the movie with more gore, sex, and a giant conspiracy. And character development, I guess. But apparently Severin is funding a bunch of these things. I wouldn't mind reading his take on Rats: Night of Terror or Hell of the Living Dead.
If the Hell of the Living Dead novelization isn't half stock photos of African animals, it is worthless to me.
 
Also a painful musical bit in the movie, which just took me out of the movie with out out of place and up it's own ass it was
So let me ask - did you pirate the movie? I know what scene you're talking about and on a big screen it looks fine and is a lot of fun. However, I knew the moment I saw the movie that once this bit moves to a small screen, it wouldn't look nearly as good and would probably come off as rather goofy.

This also applies to most of Sinners. Once this gets off the big screen into home streaming and services, everyone will go "What was the big deal?". If there was ever justification for big screens actually making a difference in a movie, it's Sinners.

Final Destination 6 - Feels almost typical for a 2020s horror sequel to an old franchise, but the deaths were pretty funny especially with the opening premonition, and also pennies. Tony Todd did pretty great for his final performance.
I saw FD6 and now that it's been awhile, I yield. They cracked an absolutely perfect formula with Final Destination. These movies really do make themselves as long as you stick to the numbers. They could pop out one of these every 5ish years and they'll still probably always make money.

I found Lake Mungo really depressing and disturbing, and not in a fun way.
That's probably the best way to view Mungo. It's existential dread done well. That being said, There's a weird association between horror and fun these days and it leaves a lot of the genre behind. You don't see too many horrors these that aren't Comedies (I mean that in a traditional literature sense). It leaves out this whole genre of horror movies that are just sad, dark, and depressing movies about awful things.

Can anyone tell me if Dr. Sleep is worth watching?
I've heard it's good but just "Shining sequel but with vampires" sounds too fucking retarded for me.
Dr. Sleep is such a vastly different movie from the Shining, it's absolutely worth watching. I'd argue it's more of a thriller than a horror movie though. Even goofy at some instances. If you're going into it expecting to be scared, don't.

The ending was always odd to me. I really, really wanted to see the Overlook tear Rose apart. The change in perspective of being an audience member knowing what the hotel would do though was always really funny.


Anyone else see Bring Her Back? It's pretty darn good.
 
Novelizations also tend to add things that werent in the movie, like deleted scenes and scenes that were left on the cutting room floor for whatever reason.
The pros say that writing a script to a movie is all about cutting scenes until you are left with the absolute minimum content that you need to tell your story as efficiently as possible, so many scenes end up cut from the film. Writing a novel is the exact opposite, it's all about filling up as many pages with words as possible and adding as many details as you can for the reader to get a full sense of the story, Which is why books based on films try to add in as much cut content as possible as well as adding their own scenes to the story.
 
It leaves out this whole genre of horror movies that are just sad, dark, and depressing movies about awful things.
You know, you're right. I had that same bad, sick feeling after finishing The Terror. It was just so soul-crushing. Stories can be sad but in a cathartic way, and those leave me feeling sad but good afterward. The Terror had no catharsis. My immediate thought after finishing it was "I did not like that", but the more time that has passed and the more I think about it, the more I appreciate it and want to rewatch it.
 
You know, you're right. I had that same bad, sick feeling after finishing The Terror. It was just so soul-crushing. Stories can be sad but in a cathartic way, and those leave me feeling sad but good afterward. The Terror had no catharsis. My immediate thought after finishing it was "I did not like that", but the more time that has passed and the more I think about it, the more I appreciate it and want to rewatch it.
Not a horror movie per se, but Mystic River has an ending that just makes you feel utter, exhausted despair. Amazing movie, and the only one I ever bought my own copy of with no intention to ever watch it after renting it originally.
 
My immediate thought after finishing it was "I did not like that", but the more time that has passed and the more I think about it, the more I appreciate it and want to rewatch it.
Movies are too coddled nowadays. Not many are willing to go the tragic route.

Not a horror movie per se, but Mystic River has an ending that just makes you feel utter, exhausted despair. Amazing movie, and the only one I ever bought my own copy of with no intention to ever watch it after renting it originally.
Same with Hereditary for me. I have no intention of watching it ever again, but it is a very uncomfortable movie.
 
Movies are too coddled nowadays. Not many are willing to go the tragic route.


Same with Hereditary for me. I have no intention of watching it ever again, but it is a very uncomfortable movie.
Hereditary felt to me like they were trying way too hard, but I got a massive laugh out of the telephone pole scene, and an even bigger one out of the diarama recreating it.
 
Hereditary felt to me like they were trying way too hard, but I got a massive laugh out of the telephone pole scene, and an even bigger one out of the diarama recreating it.
I thought Hereditary was as boring as every other ghost movie, which at this point new ghost movies should be outlawed because they've been done to death and they are all almost the same exact movie. Same goes with Exorcism movies, they are all the same movie over and over again. The Changeling and The Exorcist are all you need for those genres for the most part.
 
Back