Karl Jobst / karljobst / FAQ_GOD / simthreat / approachhernow.com - Albino autist, Spergy speed runner, Pickup predator and Bitch of Mitchell

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
So Ersatz_cats put out a new blog post today. It's not their full postmortem of "what went wrong" on the case (which honestly I don't expect to be unbiased, but I want to see what they do and don't acknowledge), but instead an acknowledgement that they missed an email reply before the judgment (April 2025 judgment, September 2024 email reply) from another video game person, Ryan Burger, about why Billy was cancelled from events, and how that may have been relevant to how Jobst's lawyers questioned.

The tl;dr is that without going full sperg level detail on the whole thing, ersatz actually has a decent point that could have been relevant to Jobst's lawyers to question Billy/Billy's witnesses/poke holes in evidence presented, but it's a day late and a dollar short, and their point that therefore the judge is therefore a dumbass and/or biased and going into namecalling like "Bobblehead Barlow" is really, really, really stupid.

What's the funniest thing is the phrase "it's always darkest below the lighthouse", and that especially applies here. Ersatz is essentially trying to have it both ways - that the judge should be fair and impartial, but the judge should also consider reputation beyond what is established by the plaintiff and the defense presenting what claims they have, what exhibits/evidences/examples/etc. they have.

From a person who will break down frame by frame and trace by trace and pulse by pulse how a DK game draws frames to show that Billy had claimed OG hardware scores that were definitely MAME, you think they could understand that the legal system has a set of rules, that the judge followed them correctly, and Karl Jobst and his lawyers fucked up, and that the judge not blanket knowing Billy's a cheater or trusting reddit/wikipedia/whatever random site is not how the legal system works. But they don't understand that, or maybe their blog is screaming into the void.
 
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Frog The Dry Socket, Seedling, demicolon and 2 others
Pointless Debater said:
So Ersatz_cats put out a new blog post today. It's not their full postmortem of "what went wrong" on the case (which honestly I don't expect to be unbiased, but I want to see what they do and don't acknowledge), but instead an acknowledgement that they missed an email reply before the judgment (April 2025 judgment, September 2024 email reply) from another video game person, Ryan Burger, about why Billy was cancelled from events, and how that may have been relevant to how Jobst's lawyers questioned.
Click to expand...
Although I understand Ersatz's argument, Berger's email reinforces and validates Judge Barlow's final opinion: Billy carried a bad reputation due to the cheating allegations, but Jobst's allegation caused additional substantial harm meriting an award of damages. Ersatz's argument is that ZERO additional harm occurred from Jobst's allegation.
 
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Frog The Dry Socket and demicolon
Pointless Debater said:
So Ersatz_cats put out a new blog post today. It's not their full postmortem of "what went wrong" on the case (which honestly I don't expect to be unbiased, but I want to see what they do and don't acknowledge), but instead an acknowledgement that they missed an email reply before the judgment (April 2025 judgment, September 2024 email reply) from another video game person, Ryan Burger, about why Billy was cancelled from events, and how that may have been relevant to how Jobst's lawyers questioned.

The tl;dr is that without going full sperg level detail on the whole thing, ersatz actually has a decent point that could have been relevant to Jobst's lawyers to question Billy/Billy's witnesses/poke holes in evidence presented, but it's a day late and a dollar short, and their point that therefore the judge is therefore a dumbass and/or biased and going into namecalling like "Bobblehead Barlow" is really, really, really stupid.

What's the funniest thing is the phrase "it's always darkest below the lighthouse", and that especially applies here. Ersatz is essentially trying to have it both ways - that the judge should be fair and impartial, but the judge should also consider reputation beyond what is established by the plaintiff and the defense presenting what claims they have, what exhibits/evidences/examples/etc. they have.

From a person who will break down frame by frame and trace by trace and pulse by pulse how a DK game draws frames to show that Billy had claimed OG hardware scores that were definitely MAME, you think they could understand that the legal system has a set of rules, that the judge followed them correctly, and Karl Jobst and his lawyers fucked up, and that the judge not blanket knowing Billy's a cheater or trusting reddit/wikipedia/whatever random site is not how the legal system works. But they don't understand that, or maybe their blog is screaming into the void.
Click to expand...
So another massive cope and seethe session.
If he had a point, it would have been in the trial. No court on this earth would consider internet accusations of cheating in a Donkey Kong game from 80s, evidence to murder by lawsuit. It is a reframed Hitler drunk water argument.
What Schizo_catz here is trying to do, is find the right combination of internet halls of debate arguments to over turn Karl's judgement in the eyes of the internet.
He is a a faggot schizo and thinks he is is a shadow string puller. He really just needs to leave the internet.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Animal Man, Frog The Dry Socket, Lukie and 2 others
So am I retarded or did Karl say in his "apology" video that for 4 YEARS he thought the lawsuit was about Billy cheating at Donkey Kong?

... After NUMEROUS talks with his lawyers, writing letters back and forth getting statements from both sides, calculating responses, having a judge evaluate the situation and giving his thoughts for over 4 fucking years?!

Either we are talking about the most dense motherfucker on earth or he maliciously went with a narrative that would give him the most brownie points and money to milk his audience.

And did he seriously go with the narrative of "uwu I did not know how the law works in Australia" after having lived there for over 40 years?

I could excuse a 18-25 year old going heads-first into a situation without giving it much thought but we're talking about a married man with a big boy house over here.

At this point you should be mature enough to do some research first and balance risk VS reward when making a huge expensive decision like that (suing a literal millionaire).
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Frog The Dry Socket, Saint Agustin, AfroMegan and 3 others
GoySlopMan said:
Although I understand Ersatz's argument, Berger's email reinforces and validates Judge Barlow's final opinion: Billy carried a bad reputation due to the cheating allegations, but Jobst's allegation caused additional substantial harm meriting an award of damages. Ersatz's argument is that ZERO additional harm occurred from Jobst's allegation.
Click to expand...
Bingo.

Ersatz ends up on an autistic but valid point that in Burger's response email he never technically claims ownership of writing it, just that he affirms that it reinforces his views. It would have been a potentially valid question for Jobst's lawyers to ask if he had written the email personally, but even then I don't see it changing much had Burger testified/provided a statement or deposition and said that someone else wrote the email at his direction and it conveyed the spirit of Billy being removed from events because the allegations of responsibility for Apollo Legend's suicide were additive to the Twin Galaxies cheating allegations in terms of harming Billy's reputation. Maybe if he said someone else in the publication was responsible and that person testified the email was only about Billy cheating things could have been different.

Ersatz then tries to turn this into a reverse gotcha, which is that Burger cancelled the events for both reasons (TG cheating allegations + Karl Jobst claiming Billy made Apollo kill himself), which is actually the opposite of what Jobst would have wanted. Having both factor in maybe could have had a factor in Karl's damages that the event cancellations/lack of future rebookings may have partially happened just with TG cheating allegations, but it would have run counter to the point that Jobst/his lawyers tried to make that Billy couldn't have his reputation ruined any further by the Apollo allegation (because being known as an arcade cheat is worse than being known to have caused someone else to kill themselves in Jobst's mind).

This is where it becomes Ersatz trying to have it both ways. They're mad about the verdict because they like Jobst and hate Billy. So they take a non-lawyer approach to applying theoretical legal logic to the situation, then use that to contort that the judge was/is a gullible idiot and call him childish nicknames.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Frog The Dry Socket, Monster from the Id, KingofSomething and 4 others
RandomGibberish said:
So am I retarded or did Karl say in his "apology" video that for 4 YEARS he thought the lawsuit was about Billy cheating at Donkey Kong?
Click to expand...
He knew from before the case started what it was about. Billy's lawyer specifically said Billy would sue Karl if he didn't remove the part about Billy forcing Apollo to pay Billy. In response, Karl did remove that exact part before later reinstating it. Karl knew the case was about that statement, he just wasn't letting the public in on that information.

The reason he argued Billy was a cheater in court was because Karl knew he was wrong in stating Billy forced Apollo to pay him. So his only options were to bow to king billy and admit defeat or prove Billy's reputation was so bad that the public now seeing him as a murderer didn't change anything. In Karl's mind, that was true. Billy cheated at vidya 30 years ago which is way worse than murder so it should have been easy for him to convince the judge of the same.

Funny thing is, Billy didn't take money in his settlement with Apollo and might not have taken any from Karl in a settlement. Only, Karl's hubris and distortions lead him to losing 1.8m AUD. Womp, womp.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Animal Man, PingLing, Frog The Dry Socket and 7 others
UsingTheBack4NoBaby said:
Funny thing is, Billy didn't take money in his settlement with Apollo and might not have taken any from Karl in a settlement. Only, Karl's hubris and distortions lead him to losing 1.8m AUD. Womp, womp.
Click to expand...
That depends. Apollo was in a pretty bad situation - financially and mentally, so trying to squeeze him for money would have been a) probably not worth it and b) a pretty shitty thing to do. Karl, on the other hand, was (keyword - was) financially stable and in pretty high spirits. I imagine if they agreed on a settlement it would have been worth 50k for Karl - the aggravated damages. An amount he could definitely afford to pay.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Frog The Dry Socket, Unimaginative Username, I_Lurk_Here and 1 other person
POV: You are 58-year old Karl Jobst startled awake from a nightmare remembering that his $665/mo payment to the Mitchell estate is due today
hblogo.webp
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: OJ Simpson, DeusVult, Unimaginative Username and 12 others
cmzng said:
Crazy, this albino nigga gotta pay child support to his own daddy now lmao
Click to expand...
He wished it was child support, he's paying 2 million AUS$ on this shit.
Let's look at the average child rearing costs in australia:

What is the cost of raising a child in Australia?​

There are a few different answers to that. We looked at a couple of studies and found the estimates ranged from $159,120 to $548,500 over 18 years.

A 2018 research by the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) shows that it costs low-paid families $340 a week to raise 2 children, a 6-year-old girl and a 10-year-old boy, which is roughly $170 per child. That's $8,840 every year or $159,120 for 18 years per child.

For unemployed families, the cost of raising 2 children of the same ages was $280 a week or roughly $140 per child. That's $7,280 every year or $131,040 for 18 years. Again, per child.

However, a 2013 report by the University of Canberra came up with completely different figures.

The earlier study created profiles for 3 different families: lower income, middle income and higher income. It found that the cost of raising 2 children would likely range from $474,000 to $1,097,000 over the course of their childhood.

For 1 child, that's an estimate of $13,166 to $30,472 every year or $237,000 to $548,500 over 18 years.

It's no secret that since then the cost of living has changed. The Consumer Price Index - which measures the average price change of goods and services - has gone up by 22% from 2018 to 2024. This accounts for the majority of child-related costs like food, utilities, and education. If we adjust the numbers from the 2018 AIFS, it's likely that the cost of raising two children is upwards now closer to $11000 per year for a low-paid family.
Click to expand...
I've asked ChatGPT to do a calculation
Click to expand...

Investing the 2 Million AUD​


If you choose to invest the 2 million AUD, generating an average annual return of 5–7%, you could earn approximately $100,000–$140,000 per year. This passive income could support:


  • High-Income Lifestyle: 3–4 children
  • Medium-Income Lifestyle: 6–8 children
  • Low-Income Lifestyle: 10 or more children

Investing provides the advantage of preserving your principal amount while covering annual expenses through returns
Click to expand...
Albino could with 2 million dollars increase the population of his race in Australia by 10-50% by himself!
I hope Maximus Wong enjoys his new friends and his mom enjoys her new exotic diverse tribal lifestyle!

14c2bc0bc18ff5d78e3d5857b7501e5f.webp32d550a3a855a85f29e1718e73509072-_1_.webpf9e6087_1715207689175-000-33uv9cc.webp20151204001206035253-original.webp
 

Attachments

  • 14c2bc0bc18ff5d78e3d5857b7501e5f.webp
    14c2bc0bc18ff5d78e3d5857b7501e5f.webp
    128.8 KB · Views: 18
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Da Capo, Frog The Dry Socket, demicolon and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back