Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[A. G. Peak]

View attachment 7448499

I assume they wrapped up their hearing an hour ago, how long until we see a decision on the injunction hit the docket?

The "Last Updated" date on CourtListener doesn't necessarily align with the last update on the docket itself. If someone with the RECAP extension searches the docket, that information will be uploaded to CourtListener.

I just tested this right now by doing a docket search for June 2. Even though the information had already been archived to CourtListener, it still uploads it and the "Last Updated" date changes to the current time.

 

[Code Cave]

Realistically I think the first update we'll get is from Destiny celebrating in DGG chat. Even if Pxie gets the majority of what she asks for, he will act like it's all expected and not a big deal. If she gets everything denied he'll act like this is a huge W and everything he's said has been accurate and Pxie's lawyers left the court in handcuffs for their misconduct.

edit:

Sounds like someone will have to pay to see the transcript:

 

[Latrell Sprewell]

The "Last Updated" date on CourtListener doesn't necessarily align with the last update on the docket itself. If someone with the RECAP extension searches the docket, that information will be uploaded to CourtListener.

Yeah I probably could have just read the tooltip included in that timestamp. Sorry, I'm operating on like 3 hours of sleep and way too interested in what comes of this

 

[StrangerMe]

Realistically I think the first update we'll get is from Destiny celebrating in DGG chat. Even if Pxie gets the majority of what she asks for, he will act like it's all expected and not a big deal. If she gets everything denied he'll act like this is a huge W and everything he's said has been accurate and Pxie's lawyers left the court in handcuffs for their misconduct.

Yep lol. I've been updating his rustlelogs every 2 minutes in my other monitor for the last 50 min.

 

[Madone]

Realistically I think the first update we'll get is from Destiny celebrating in DGG chat. Even if Pxie gets the majority of what she asks for, he will act like it's all expected and not a big deal. If she gets everything denied he'll act like this is a huge W and everything he's said has been accurate and Pxie's lawyers left the court in handcuffs for their misconduct.

edit:

Sounds like someone will have to pay to see the transcript:
View attachment 7448737

If she gets a single minor thing denied he’ll treat it as a huge W.

Only if she gets every single thing granted will he start accusing Pxie’s lawyers and witnesses of perjury.

 

[cmzng]

You’d think the most reasonable takeaway from this is the judge advising the plaintiffs to amend their complaint if destiny’s only leg is smj, and destiny gloating about pxie lawyers being dumb and unhinged for all the bad faith blah blah he spews incessantly

Although I am curious what sort of excuse Andy b comes up with for the death threats being totally kosher. There’s some legal dicksucking you gotta pay big bucks for I imagine

 

[StrangerMe]

Considering he's not throwing a victory lap, I'm guessing it didn't go like he thought it would.
(Ignore him claiming it went well for them, he would have said that regardless)

*Edit:

(ignores Abby's message, and has nothing to say about it)

*Edit 2:

 

[Madone]

View attachment 7448908
Considering he's not throwing a victory lap, I'm guessing it didn't go like he thought it would.
(Ignore him claiming it went well for them, he would have said that regardless)

*Edit:
View attachment 7448927

For any US legal professionals, aren’t TROs regularly decided purely on the basis of exhibits and witness declarations rather than court testimonies ?

 

[S. Key Leton]

this one is interesting, if true

that would be mean that judge agrees that there is some basis in Destiny's logic

 

[Madone]

View attachment 7448947

this one is interesting, if true

that would be mean that judge agrees that there is some basis in Destiny's logic

They got a boomer judge

Sending a video to someone you knew for years, trusted, is a public figure bragging about accountability and his expertise on consent

Vs

A teenage sex worker you don’t know the name of within 10 days of meeting her and probably a handful of other randos from discord

I don’t trust Destiny’s framing at all. The judge might have asked, Pxie’s team might have given a totally proper answer but Destiny chose the question as his only takeaway.

I hope we get a transcript.

 

[A. G. Peak]

Destiny keeps harping on this incredibly stupid point that jstlk and other people who have commented on the case are not relevant, after he made death threats against them. Destiny sent a document request regarding jstlk, lol. Now another one of the non-relevant people, Lav, is brought up and it's a funny own goal by Destiny (WARNING: Loud cringe sound effects):

View attachment 7448166

After he reads the line about Lav being included in his Initial Disclosures, he says, "Also, by the way, they publicly filed this initially, which was funny and a fuckup."

Is he talking about Pxie filing her Initial Disclosures, or is he saying his team accidentally filed his Initial Disclosures publicly? I don't remember ever seeing them and I assume we would have caught it.

 

[StrangerMe]

Seems like he stopped typing. The witnesses thing seems like a huge cope, which makes me wonder if it indeed went well if he's trying to make something out of nothing.

The judge agreeing with his argument seems dangerous.
It's retarded tho. As Madone says, it's not comparable at all. Destiny didn't even know (and still doesn't know) whether the girl he was sharing that stuff with was underaged or an adult.

It's apples and oranges.

 

[SchizoNerd420]

For any US legal professionals, aren’t TROs regularly decided purely on the basis of exhibits and witness declarations rather than court testimonies ?

Yeah. It really just depends on the case, but I certainly wouldn't call it "insane" that they showed up with no witnesses, considering they filed declarations and one of their motions is asserting that witnesses refuse to come forward because Destiny and his community is psychotic. No doubt if they had showed up with witnesses, Destiny would be questioning the basis of that motion (well how scared could they be if they showed up to court) or whining about how they didn't share a witness list with them beforehand.

And this might mean nothing, but the hearing today was designated as a "motion hearing," not an "evidentiary hearing," so I wouldn't actually expect live witness testimony based purely on that designation, although I don't know if this district even distinguishes between the two.

Is he talking about Pxie filing her Initial Disclosures, or is he saying his team accidentally filed his Initial Disclosures publicly? I don't remember ever seeing them and I assume we would have caught it.

Apologies if you're already aware of this, but Pxie's team did file their initial disclosures on April 4, but they didn't include Lav. I'm not sure if that was inadvertent on their part, but it was unnecessary. "Defendant's Initial Disclosures" should mean initial disclosures that HE served on Pxie's team. I don't think those were filed.

 

[kendoubleyou]

If the case is continuing, we get discovery next right? The case being dismissed is the only thing that would be an issue here really. If it's moving onto discovery we're in for a gold mine that will last a year+

 

[darkfate_fgg]

View attachment 7448908
Considering he's not throwing a victory lap, I'm guessing it didn't go like he thought it would.
(Ignore him claiming it went well for them, he would have said that regardless)

*Edit:
View attachment 7448927
(ignores Abby's message, and has nothing to say about it)

*Edit 2:
View attachment 7448953

I agree.

As far as I can tell, based on the little information he has provided so far and the fact that he hasn't addressed any of the crucial and substantive points of the motion(s), it just sounds like his now usual cope.

At this point you can't take anything at face value, what the buttplug-connoisseur spouts, since there is no one left who would challenge him critically and his community solely consists of short bus riding window licker.

sadSTIny!

 

[A. G. Peak]

The docket was updated with information about today's proceedings. They were there for two and a half hours.

Spoiler: Text

PAPERLESS Minute Order for proceedings held before Ch. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres: Motion Hearing held on 6/3/2025 re 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Jane Doe. Witnesses, Jane Doe (Plaintiff) and Steven K. Bonnell, II sworn and testified. The Court shall take the matter under advisement and issue a Report and Recommendation. Total time in court: 2 hour(s) : 35 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Andrew B. Brettler, Carlos Alberto Garcia Perez, Gustavo Daniel Lage, Patricia Marie Patino, Robert L. Raskopf, Andrea Garcia-Baerga (Law Clerk). Other appearances: Steven K. Bonnell II (Defendant) and Jane Doe (Plaintiff). (Digital EGT-09:46:55; 10:15:02) (fbn) (Entered: 06/03/2025)

 

[SchizoNerd420]

If the case is continuing, we get discovery next right? The case being dismissed is the only thing that would be an issue here really. If it's moving onto discovery we're in for a gold mine that will last a year+

Discovery is currently ongoing. Don't let Destiny's cope fool you, the case was always going to proceed past this hearing.

View attachment 7449145

Interesting. So it seems like Pxie and Destiny both testified.

 

[do ut des]

The docket was updated with information about today's proceedings. They were there for two and a half hours.

View attachment 7449127

Spoiler: Text

PAPERLESS Minute Order for proceedings held before Ch. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres: Motion Hearing held on 6/3/2025 re 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Jane Doe. Witnesses, Jane Doe (Plaintiff) and Steven K. Bonnell, II sworn and testified. The Court shall take the matter under advisement and issue a Report and Recommendation. Total time in court: 2 hour(s) : 35 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Andrew B. Brettler, Carlos Alberto Garcia Perez, Gustavo Daniel Lage, Patricia Marie Patino, Robert L. Raskopf, Andrea Garcia-Baerga (Law Clerk). Other appearances: Steven K. Bonnell II (Defendant) and Jane Doe (Plaintiff). (Digital EGT-09:46:55; 10:15:02) (fbn) (Entered: 06/03/2025)

If the us courts operate somewhat like the european courts, 2.5hrs for a motion hearing is quiet a long time. Imo thats good since quick hearings typically arent good for the active party/the plaintiff.

 

[kendoubleyou]

Discovery is currently ongoing. Don't let Destiny's cope fool you, the case was always going to proceed past this hearing.

Interesting. So it seems like Pxie and Destiny both testified.

Of course, I'm just saying everything aside from that leads to more cope from the raped rapist

 

[GarlicFragment]

They got a boomer judge

I can't believe Destiny's framing is honest, and if it is, Pxie's attorneys - even if retarded - should be able to easily argue why it's different.

You made a good juxtaposition, and the risk is obviously different. And it's this risk that matters, no-one is arguing malicious intent from the risk that "something could always leak if you record a sexual encounter." It's the extraordinary risks taken by Destiny that might constitute malicious intent.

is he saying his team accidentally filed his Initial Disclosures publicly

Whether it was his team or not idk, but my understanding is that it was his Initial Disclosure. That's what the filing says, and Lav was not mentioned in Pxie's Initial Disclosure so I don't think it was a mix up.