Pride Month

For those unaware, during the initial Trump administration, mainstream media outlets published articles asserting that milk consumption was being co-opted as a symbol of white supremacist or Neo-Nazi ideology.

nazinyt.webp
(link)
nazimilk.webp
(link)
 
Are they proud of getting shit in their urethra? Or are they proud of the fact that they need diapers from bowel incontinence?
Putting a spotlight on the health ramifications caused by promoted sexual behaviors is swept under the rug, because doing so goes against the gay sex positivity at all costs meme. This has been standard practice since at least the AIDS epidemic, so I think the answer to your question would be yes with a question mark at the end.
 
Last edited:
Health ramifications are swept under the rug or simply not talked about. Talking about them is one of the no-nos maybe unless someone is fetishizing it. You will not find an advocate for avoiding these problems accepted because it goes against sex positivity at all costs mindset that has been a staple since the AIDS pandemic.
Its the same as the body positivity movement.

I was obese once. I lost the weight. What I never see those fucking tubs of lard talk about is how difficult it is to have good hygiene when you are obese. When I was 300 pounds, I found that my shoulder hurt from wiping my ass. I got ingrown hairs from my thighs rubbing together. I was always so sweaty. It was awful. Now imagine all those 500+ pound ham planets preaching body positivity. They are physically incapable of wiping their own ass, their inner thighs probably get staph infections or at the very least it chafes and smells. Its disgusting, and there is no excuse for it because losing weight is actually pretty easy.

Back to the gay thing, they like to paint themselves as flamboyant and wholesome people. Yet many of them enjoy sexually harassing people and they are vindictive petty tyrants that demand everyone affirm their disgusting lifestyle or be ostracized from society. They are also disgusting and quite frankly a threat to public health. They have to clean the shit out of their ass before sex, they have to take medication to lower the risk of getting a disease. Anal sex can result in incontinence, sepsis, prolapsed anus, perforated bowels, and micro tears on your rectum and colon provide a perfect vector of attack for any disease. Many gay people also engage in other forms of debauchery that aren't limited to anal sex. They humiliate and degrade themselves, they engage in scat play, they engage in piss play, there are men at pride parades who pretend to be dogs which leads me to infer many of those people find the idea of sex with animals to be appealing. Many gay people confess to being molested as teenagers. The reason it was forbidden by christian society for so long wasn't out of ignorant bigotry and hatred. Quite the opposite, Christianity is a religion that believes love is a virtue. Christian society had standards that were purely for the well being of the community, and caring about the well being of the people around you is an act of love. The reason homosexuals weren't tolerated is because they have sex with a hole thats sole purpose is to expell shit from your body. In a time where we didn't have modern medicine and disenfectants, that sort of behavior could lead to people spreading diseases, it can wipe out huge swathes of the community. Thousands dead all because you felt compelled to fuck a shitting hole. Nowadays, even though we have things to mitigate these issues, that doesn't make anal sex less depraved. Even if you take prep, and clean the shit out of your asshole, that doesn't negate the damage that is being done to your body. Your ass may recover from small insertions but constant anal penetration has negative consequences, it still makes you prone to disease, and it still causes incontinence and ignoring that doesn't make it go away.

Its fucking gross, they know its fucking gross, and they default to the same bullshit talking points any time you bring up any details that aren't convenient for their narrative. Its always, "you are a homophobe, you are a nazi, you are this, you are that". Hell, they will call you racist for good measure, which is pretty odd cause it implies all minorities are faggots. I suppose I can agree with that sentiment.

But faggots aren't just flamboyant wholesome hecking gay chungus. Lesbians have the highest rates of domestic violence. Gay men are predatory bags of disease. Bisexuals are porn addicted gooners. Trannies are fucking insane and they are an amalgamation of everything wrong with alphabet people, walking around dressed in a costume that parodies femininity, preying on children, assaulting women, and they top it all off by having a gaping wound that wreaks like shit and doesn't even remotely look like a vagina, and they stick foreign objects into said wound to stimulate their fucking prostate which, in all honesty, is even more disgusting than the normal run of the mill poopy butt sex.
 
MLB changed their Icon on the day of and have already started the pandering and It kinda breaks my heart. Huge baseball nerd. I'd hope they realized that the pendulum was swinging back hard and that the majority of baseball fans aren't gay and don't give two shits about pride month. I am curious if it's the team owners who are forcing this the league to do this. Some of the team icons are now all prided up. Yet look at how many aren't. Who knows
They changed it again for Lou Gehrig day, and have since changed it back to the original, so only gay for a day I suppose. There's a reddit thread about it here, where, if you sort by new, there is an actually surprising amount of people saying it's good the gay is gone and the people saying it's bad the gay is gone are being downvoted.
https://www.reddit.com/r/baseball/comments/1l2eh7w/mlb_has_removed_the_pride_rainbow_from_its_logo/
https://archive.is/tjPzc
 
They changed it again for Lou Gehrig day, and have since changed it back to the original, so only gay for a day I suppose. There's a reddit thread about it here, where, if you sort by new, there is an actually surprising amount of people saying it's good the gay is gone and the people saying it's bad the gay is gone are being downvoted.
https://www.reddit.com/r/baseball/comments/1l2eh7w/mlb_has_removed_the_pride_rainbow_from_its_logo/
https://archive.is/tjPzc
some of the UK football team subs, like the Everton one, have the rainbow flag on their the subreddit logo all year round. I think the mods ban you if you ask about it.
 
The reason homosexuals weren't tolerated is because they have sex with a hole thats sole purpose is to expell shit from your body. In a time where we didn't have modern medicine and disenfectants, that sort of behavior could lead to people spreading diseases, it can wipe out huge swathes of the community.
That's  a reason, but it's not the reason. there are a number of non-penetrative acts (which you'd think would be the main methods, but aren't because there's a deeper extra-human evil involved), and they're out too. It has more to do with what the place of sexuality is under the Christian paradigm. "Marriage and Virginity According to St John Chrysostom" is a great book on the subject: it doesn't mention homosexuality specifically, but it doesn't have to—it makes it pretty crystal clear that all acts without reproductive intent are out, partially on the basis of analogy with man's union with God in theosis. I've included a pdf, since it's available online legitimately for free (it was Fr. Josiah Trenham's graduate thesis somewhere if I remember).

Here's another reason:
1747074628301.webp
J. Børtnes, “Eros Transformed: Same-Sex Love and Divine Desire. Reflections on the Erotic Vocabulary in St. Gregory of Nazianzus’s Speech on St. Basil the Great,” in Greek Biography andPanegyric, ed. Hägg and Rousseau, 180–93.

This is St. Gregory the Theologian in his Funerary Oration on St. Basil the Great. For those unaware, those are two of the three Cappadocians—best known for their heavy influence in formulating the terminology used to define the Trinity at the second Ecumenical Council (where the Nicene Creed came from).

You can't have language like this in the West today, and it's because of the effect of "the gays" as a category on the Western mind. Even C.S. Lewis wrote about it in the philia section of "The Four Loves", and I'm pretty sure that was back in the days where guys didn't wear towels in the locker room (the old guys who do that today are from those times, I think). It was a problem even then—he had to have a whole chapter about how having close friends isn't gay. Frankly I think he went a little too far in totally divorcing philia from eros, but that just goes to show the point.

It doesn't even matter if you yourself aren't gay at all; we're still raised to see at as "one of the options", and that permanently disfigures the way we approach and interact with each other. It's like a kid growing up in a house with incest: what does that hug mean?
 

Attachments

Last edited:
MLB changed their Icon on the day of and have already started the pandering and It kinda breaks my heart. Huge baseball nerd. I'd hope they realized that the pendulum was swinging back hard and that the majority of baseball fans aren't gay and don't give two shits about pride month. I am curious if it's the team owners who are forcing this the league to do this. Some of the team icons are now all prided up. Yet look at how many aren't. Who knows
View attachment 7448934
Also gotta love the whole "Your either with us or homophobic"
That totally makes people want to support you!

Also the Rockies and White Sox are pandering because they need people to come to their games. It's so obvious :lit:
Suffah Dodgers fans!
 
Back