Business Chips Ahoy and Oreo maker Mondelez sues grocery chain Aldi over similar packaging


By Auzinea Bacon, CNN
Mon June 2, 2025

gettyimages-2217866753.webp
Packages of Chips Ahoy cookies are displayed next to Aldi Supermarket's Benton's brand cookies on May 30, 2025, in Burbank, California.

Snack brand giant Mondelez is suing grocery chain Aldi, alleging that the grocer’s store-brand snack packaging “blatantly copies” Mondelez.

The maker of Oreo, Triscuit and Chips Ahoy filed the lawsuit on May 27 against the German grocer, which has US headquarters in Illinois, in the federal court for the Northern District of Illinois. Chicago-based Mondelez said in the lawsuit that Aldi’s cookie and cracker packaging was “likely to deceive and confuse” customers.

Aldi did not respond to CNN’s request for comment.

The discount supermarket chain primarily sells store-brand versions for lower prices than popular name brands, such as those owned by Mondelez. Mondelez said in its filing that it previously contacted Aldi about “copycats” of the Oreo cookie design, Teddy Grahams, Belvita biscuits, Triscuit crackers and Tate’s Bake Shop cookies.

Aldi eventually “discontinued” and “changed certain of these infringing products,” Mondelez said.

Trademark lawyer Josh Gerben, who is not involved in this case, said the law is designed to protect consumers.

“I can go to the store and reasonably assume that I recognize the name, and that’s who I’m buying from,” Gerben said, but some customers “think that they might be buying something from the Oreo brand or Wheat Thins, but they’re actually getting a substitute.”

The lawsuit claims Aldi’s peanut butter creme-filled cookies, chocolate chip cookies and Thin Wheat crackers have packaging similar to Nutter Butter, Chips Ahoy and Wheat Thins, among other similarities.

ap25149818477376.webp
This combo of images shows, top row from left, Mondelez's products Nutter Butter, Chips Ahoy! and Oreo cookies; bottom row from left, shows Aldi’s products, Peanut Butter Creme, Chocolate Chip Cookies and Original Chocolate Sandwich Cookies with Vanilla.

Mondelez said in the lawsuit that “if not stopped,” Aldi’s packaging threatens to “irreparably harm” Mondelez and its brands.

Mondelez is seeking monetary damages as well as a court order to prevent Aldi from selling such products, according to the filing.

Mondelez did not respond to CNN’s request for comment.

This is not the first time Aldi has faced a lawsuit over its store-brand products looking overtly similar in name, color and design to other brands. Last December, an Australian federal court said Aldi was liable for copyright infringement over children’s snacks packaging that resembled Hampden Holdings’ Baby Bellies puffs packaging.

“You want to fly close enough to the sun because you want the benefit of something,” but not too close, Gerben said. He added that such lawsuits are a case-by-case analysis and there’s no “bright line test” that would decide Aldi’s liability.

Aldi has over 2,400 locations in the United States. In February, the chain announced plans to open 225 stores in 2025.



marketing.webp



I've often joked about how blatantly Aldi rips off the branding and naming used by other companies, so this isn't a surprise. It's not limited to cookies, it's everything from frozen foods, to drink powders, to "Bauhn" branded Chinese electronics. I hope they win and Mondelez is irreparably harmed.
 
Trademark is also where some of the dumbest things happen... copyright is pretty cut and dry by comparison.
Trademark law allowed Buc-ee's to bully a similar store because they dared to put a cartoon alligator wearing a hat in a colored circle.
1000000532.webp
On what planet is Choke Canyon infringing on, well, anything? Uranus? Pluto?
 
My mother loves Aldi but I don't get it. Is it suppose to be cheaper knock-offs of regular brands you'd find at Walmart/Kroger's/Target/Publix/etc?
No advertising, decent store brands, sister company to Trader Joe's.

Aldi and TJ's were founded by literal brothers, run as companion stores with different experiences.

Aldi is flat out cheaper in 99% of cases, encourages cleanliness and customer mindfulness by tokenizing their carts (They hold a quarter hostage and you get it back for returning the cart)and charging a nominal fee for bags (~12cents).

It's a pleasant shopping experience and operates on minimal employees.
 
Trademark law allowed Buc-ee's to bully a similar store because they dared to put a cartoon alligator wearing a hat in a colored circle.
View attachment 7450996
On what planet is Choke Canyon infringing on, well, anything? Uranus? Pluto?
Left: walleyed rodent with vacant smile, possibly on crack, possibly wearing MAGA FASCIST hat
Right: hardworking reptile, pillar of his community, defender of natural wetlands, also vital component of tourist industry
 
Those are too damn close imo.

It's fine when it's obviously a reference, but different enough (they should have kept everything the same and swapped the colors).

Anyway my favorite pastime is finding the Dr Pepper knockoff names on store brands, etc. Always such a trip.
 
No advertising, decent store brands, sister company to Trader Joe's.

Aldi and TJ's were founded by literal brothers, run as companion stores with different experiences.

Aldi is flat out cheaper in 99% of cases, encourages cleanliness and customer mindfulness by tokenizing their carts (They hold a quarter hostage and you get it back for returning the cart)and charging a nominal fee for bags (~12cents).

It's a pleasant shopping experience and operates on minimal employees.
The bags are great cat toys if you cut off the handles. My cat plays with them for hours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lizard Pope
Trademark is also where some of the dumbest things happen... copyright is pretty cut and dry by comparison.

During the early years of arcade games? Companies tried to sue each other over trademark infringement because their game had an 8 way joystick and any other game that did too was merely copying their "unique" equipment. Or that a karate fighting game featured...... a guy in a white gi with a black belt, just like THEIRS!!!! OBVIOUS INFRINGEMENT!!!!!!!!
Sounds like some of the shit that's been going on with smartphones ever since they were introduced. There's been a few three-way lawsuits over patented finger movements.
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: frozen_runner
Aldi doesn't stock name brand products except in the seasonal aisle, and what they get is very limited. People shop there because they don't care about your shit name brand snack junk and just want actually affordable staple food and chocolate that isn't made in America and fucking disgusting.
 
Those are too damn close imo.

It's fine when it's obviously a reference, but different enough (they should have kept everything the same and swapped the colors).

Anyway my favorite pastime is finding the Dr Pepper knockoff names on store brands, etc. Always such a trip.
I know there are groups devoted to finding obscure or regional off-brand Mountain Dew sodas from around the country and tasting them. Like they'll go on road trips to East Bumfuck, Michigan because someone said they had bottles of Hilltop Do or Prairie Dew or something at the Dollar Tree there.
 
I think that there should be clauses in these sorts of laws called "PUNISHMENT CLAUSES!" Which just take like an entire years income from you if you try and abuse them, and if you do it three times your company gets dissolved. Or something, Idk.
 
Yeah, I can't see why this is suddenly an issue, stores have had knock off brands in the same aisle forever, in many chains.
Aldi stores here are free-standing and you only find their products in their stores. No-one shopping at Aldi is going to think their clones are the name brand products, regardless of whether or not the packaging is similar.
 
Back