Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • πŸ• I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.8%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 72 15.9%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 152 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 108 23.8%

  • Total voters
    454
You could say that the rule is rendered...

π˜•π˜Άπ˜­π˜­ 𝘒𝘯π˜₯ 𝘷𝘰π˜ͺπ˜₯
if the final ruling from judge whoever, I don't care, even the worst Supreme, ended with that I would gain infinite respect for them
 
ECF 328
Screenshot 2025-06-05 190815.webp
 

Attachments

Hmmmm. Russ needs to discover information about the John Doe defendants in a case where discovery is stayed. This is quite the quandary. While technically, yes, it violates the stay, I think the judge will tardguard (tm) and let this one go through.

Bets on when the judge will reply? I'm saying in two weeks.
 
After reading that, speculation time... is Greer too affected by mental disability to realize what he is doing all the time is FUCKING RETARDED, is he actively and knowingly malicious like a whoremongering pimplord (nonpractising), or is he both?
He just doesn't understand legal stuff, but he managed to get a paralegal degree in twice the time it takes to get one, so he believes he's a lawyer.
 
Next will be Greer's reply that "this isn't fair because Mr. Hardin is doing discovery. See? It's just an innocent goof. Now, sanction Hardin for doing his job", even though that's not accurate.
I really hope the Judge points out that Greer had the opportunity to challenge the stay or ask for any exceptions needed. And that time has past. Shitlips poor case management and planning does not make it Nulls responsibility.
 
Back