I really wish some big normie pandering lawtube channel would pick it up not to discuss the case itself, but the fact that several courts will gladly accomodate for a total mushmouth retard sped shitlips litigant, up to and including doing plaintiff's work for him, and drag the case on for years, seemingly only because everyone involved in it from the government is incompetent and should be disposed of.
The vast majority of Lawtubers worship the Judiciary. The only ones that don't are 2A Advocates and Constitutionalists but even THEN there are exceptions.
The system can be criticized, but it can't be doubted, and it always has to be respected. If it isn't, well, everything falls apart you see.
It's in the Constitution, after all.
The Judiciary REALLY has two jobs based off of who they're dealing with. If it's "The Government" their job is "interpret" Law in a way most favorable to the Government. Only when the SC steps in and says "We LITERALLY can't find a way to give the Government deference here. Like.. There's literally a line in the Constitution that expressesly forbids this in this exact way" do they limit Governmental power.
For squabbles between commoners and corporations they get free reign to do whatever they want. If it's a bad ruling an appeals court basically gives deference to lower courts unless it's so egregious they can't ignore it. The SC basically doesn't like doing anything, hoping their bad children in the lower courts can handle it. Only when it's obvious a lower court has fabricated law (also known as POWER) from thin air do they step in and do something. They really don't like it when Districts start forming little fiefdoms that ignore decades of settled law.
I'm beginning to think this court ain't great at the whole judiciarying thing.
It's Nulls money, and the Judge gets paid either way. He's got no dog in the fight so why would the Court care? To be fair this is kind of how you'd LIKE it to go when some normie with no legal experience or money sues a corpo. It never DOES, but ideally you'd want the Courts to be kind of favorable to you when you're in appeals court over of a summery dismissal for Qualified Immunity when a cop mag dumps you because you reached did your wallet.
What the fuck is Utah's problem where they blatantly disregard law? This entire process has become such a mockery and a shitshow. Does the judge not care? Do the courts not care? Are these morons in Utah just that apathetic? Do they seriously not see the legal rammifications already shaping up from their blunder (ISPs v Sony). Are they seriously bending over backwards for a "man" who has repeatedly defied and failed to produce evidence?
To be fair Judges will do shit like this when they REALLY don't like you and don't want to have your case back on appeals, or disagree with an issue being challenged in court.
Like they'll give you the benefit of the doubt or guide you down pathways to questioning so you can argue multiple points, even if they suck or are bad. It removes it as a pathway to appeal and solidifies precedent.