Crime Porn site owner pleads guilty to sex trafficking in San Diego

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Article archive

Porn site owner pleads guilty to sex trafficking in San Diego

June 6 (UPI) -- Michael Pratt, the mastermind behind the GirlsDoPorn website and an international fugitive for three years, pleaded guilty to sex trafficking in federal court in San Diego.

Pratt pleaded guilty Thursday to conspiracy to sex trafficking from 2012 to 2019 and sex trafficking a victim in 2012 of the superseding indictment, according to a U.S. Department of Justice news release.

Sentencing for Pratt, 42, is scheduled for Sept. 8 before U.S. District Judge Janis L. Sammartino.

He liquidated his assets and fled from the United States in 2019. He was named to the FBI's Top Ten Most Wanted list until his arrest in Spain on Dec. 22, 2022, and was extradited to San Diego in March 2024.

Pratt was charged in October 2019 in the Southern District of California in connection with deceiving and coercing hundreds of young women from the United States and Canada to appear in pornographic videos.

Pratt and his co-defendants used force, fraud and coercion on the women -- mostly in their late teens -- to appear in GirlsDoPorn videos, the Department of Justice said.

During court hearings, victims detailed how they had lost jobs, were evicted, dropped out of school or was disowned by friends and family. Some attempted suicide.

According to prosecutors, Pratt sometimes transported the women to and from the site of the video shoot at hotels or short-term rental units in the San Diego area.

The prospective models were told the video would never be posted online or released in the United States.

In 2012, Pratt recruited co-defendant Matthew Wolfe, now 43, to work for him. They also developed GirlsDoToys out of the same office in San Diego.

With million of views, they posted video content on free porn sites such.

The websites charged visitors a subscription fee to access content, and generated $17 million in revenue for them, according to prosecutors.

In 2013, Pratt recruited another co-defendant, Ruben Andre Garcia, a male model who engaged in sex acts on video with the women. Garcia is now 36.

Prosecutors said Pratt and other members of the conspiracy ensured that the victims did not find out they owned and operated GirlsDoPorn and GirlsDoToys.

If the women said they wanted to stop making the video, the co-conspirators threatened to sue the women, cancel flights home and post the videos online, prosecutors said.

In May 2012, Pratt used the alias "Matt" to recruit Victim 1 for modeling and posted an ad on Craigslist as Bubblegum Casting.

The victim, who was 18, was told the job was actually to shoot an "adult video" but was falsely told it would only be seen in Australia by private clients and would not be posted on the internet.

The victim was persuaded to fly from a state outside of California to San Diego for the video shoot at a hotel. Pratt told the FBI he gave the victim $2,000.

Garcia was sentenced to 20 years in prison on June 14, 2021; Theodore Gyi, 47, who served as a photographer, four years on Nov. 9, 2022; Wolfe 14 years on March 20, 2024. Valorie Moser, 42, the office manager, is set for sentencing on Sept. 12.

"I can remember being so worried to tell him [Garcia] that I was just 17," a woman told the court during a hearing for Garcia. "But he was not mad or concerned. Instead, he was excited and was eager to start."
 
The prospective models were told the video would never be posted online or released in the United States.
I'm sorry, but this is evidence all of these women were stupid as hell. What could that even mean in the age of the internet? Nobody could ever randomly decide to put them online? How?
 
I'm sorry, but this is evidence all of these women were stupid as hell. What could that even mean in the age of the internet? Nobody could ever randomly decide to put them online? How?

You're not going to see any videos containing women who thought this guy was a creep or a liar and decided not to believe the shit he was peddling, so yes all of these women are the ones that were stupid as hell.
 
In May 2012, Pratt used the alias "Matt" to recruit Victim 1 for modeling and posted an ad on Craigslist as Bubblegum Casting.

The victim, who was 18, was told the job was actually to shoot an "adult video" but was falsely told it would only be seen in Australia by private clients and would not be posted on the internet.

The victim was persuaded to fly from a state outside of California to San Diego for the video shoot at a hotel. Pratt told the FBI he gave the victim $2,000.
So the kicker here is that he (and his company) lied about the method of distribution, and for this he is charged with sex trafficking. When this is clearly just a contract violation, and not a criminal matter.

However, earlier in the article it said
Pratt and his co-defendants used force, fraud and coercion on the women -- mostly in their late teens -- to appear in GirlsDoPorn videos, the Department of Justice said.
So perhaps other women were abused, but victim one clearly wasn't (or they would have said so).

During court hearings, victims detailed how they had lost jobs, were evicted, dropped out of school or was disowned by friends and family. Some attempted suicide.
Clearly this is what the issue at hand was. Wasn't the porn, wasn't the distribution, and I'm willing to bet it wasn't even their practices. It was the fact that these women faced social backlash for doing porn.

The American justice system will move heaven and earth to prevent women from facing any accountability; and failing that, will seek out any men it can find to punish to "right the wrongs" those women faced.
 
Human trafficking and porn. Name a more iconic duo. That said, there are plenty of women who would sign up for such degrading acts willingly.

Wish I still have that clip of the founder of Facial Abuse actually admitting on the Killstream that the women who sign up for his humiliation ritual of a site were warned repeatedly that they'll get humiliated and abused if they were to sign the contract. And they did with some repeating their tenure!
 
So the kicker here is that he (and his company) lied about the method of distribution, and for this he is charged with sex trafficking. When this is clearly just a contract violation, and not a criminal matter.
Read the Mann act. It's absurdly expansive.
Clearly this is what the issue at hand was. Wasn't the porn, wasn't the distribution, and I'm willing to bet it wasn't even their practices. It was the fact that these women faced social backlash for doing porn.

The American justice system will move heaven and earth to prevent women from facing any accountability; and failing that, will seek out any men it can find to punish to "right the wrongs" those women faced.
To some extent, that's totally part of it. But the powers that be are usually more inclined to exert soft social influence to shit on the people (men and women often) shitting on women for doing porn. It's cheaper and easier and less attention grabbing than actually pursuing criminal charges.

Usually when there's a criminal case, the accused actually has legitimately violated some aspect of trafficking law. At least in part.

Like I rarely feel bad for dumb girls who show their butthole consensually and they end up all over Facebook. But I also don't feel too bad for some guy who tried to get into the nudie business and fucked up and possibly crossed the line into trafficking. Even if he specifically is a miscarriage of justice once, I just generally consider that to be a risk of the field. If you don't have your legals 120% nailed down, idk what to tell you. You fucked up.
 
This is like the same shit they used to go after the guy that did the Mom POV shit. I can't believe those guys paid those average bitches thousands of dollars to shoot a porn scene. It's called Mom POV so it wasn't even young women. I watched some of them and its bitches in their 30's 40's and even older doing porn. They definitely overpaid a lot of them. These days you can find them all for free. I don't think anyone is going after them for copyright shit.

I don't know if they ever went after the BRCC guy. lol
 
17 milion dollars, jesus

I wonder what the final profit was.
This isn't like pimping, they earned money from just views and subscriptions?

And THAT in an era with free porn

Though I guess that's over the course of, what, 10 years? And doesn't include money that went to the girls, travel/hotel expenses, etc
But still, damn
 
Wish I still have that clip of the founder of Facial Abuse actually admitting on the Killstream that the women who sign up for his humiliation ritual of a site were warned repeatedly that they'll get humiliated and abused if they were to sign the contract. And they did with some repeating their tenure!
Of course he would say that and of course you would believe it. Porn is kiked out industry and the only people who defend it are coomers, brownoids, and other defectives.
 
17 milion dollars, jesus

I wonder what the final profit was.
This isn't like pimping, they earned money from just views and subscriptions?

And THAT in an era with free porn

Though I guess that's over the course of, what, 10 years? And doesn't include money that went to the girls, travel/hotel expenses, etc
But still, damn
The bitches like to act like they were taken advantage of in reality they were paid for the shoot, and they knew what they were getting into. Unless we are ready to admit women are just retarded shouldn't be allowed to vote and they all need to be under the care of a tard wrangler. Women cry their way through life and manipulate people for sympathy. They also lie and throw around false accusations like crazy.
 
This is like the same shit they used to go after the guy that did the Mom POV shit. I can't believe those guys paid those average bitches thousands of dollars to shoot a porn scene. It's called Mom POV so it wasn't even young women. I watched some of them and its bitches in their 30's 40's and even older doing porn.
>Man is charged for profiting from sex trafficking on his website. Meaning there's a high chance of minors being involved
>”Let me tell you about all the porn I've gooned to because I have no self control”

Kill yourself, faggot.
 
So the kicker here is that he (and his company) lied about the method of distribution, and for this he is charged with sex trafficking. When this is clearly just a contract violation, and not a criminal matter.
There is a little more going on besides a simple contract violation. If they didn't go for the extra spicy charge of sex trafficking they would be hitting him with revenge porn and rape by deception because he lied about the nature of the shoot and distributed them online without their concent. The girls are retarted for believing the man, but the man is still a predator for deceiving the women for sex and profits.
 
>Man is charged for profiting from sex trafficking on his website. Meaning there's a high chance of minors being involved
>”Let me tell you about all the porn I've gooned to because I have no self control”

Kill yourself, faggot.
It's not about minors, it's just about flying them around, or else they would have hit them age related charges. The GirlsDoPorn stuff is just scumbag guys tricking dumb sluts, at least one of whom was effectively cheating on her deployed military boyfriend or fiance, to probably no vet's surprise. It's good that the guys running the site are getting legally fucked, but don't shed too many tears for the women involved.
 
True, though i make an exception for the ones that were under-18

The adult ones, meh.
There are no females under the age of 18 in porn. They are all adults and know what they are doing and getting into.
>Man is charged for profiting from sex trafficking on his website. Meaning there's a high chance of minors being involved
>”Let me tell you about all the porn I've gooned to because I have no self control”

Kill yourself, faggot.
There are no minors involved.

Now go be a faggot somewhere else.
 
Back