Crime Porn site owner pleads guilty to sex trafficking in San Diego

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Article archive

Porn site owner pleads guilty to sex trafficking in San Diego

June 6 (UPI) -- Michael Pratt, the mastermind behind the GirlsDoPorn website and an international fugitive for three years, pleaded guilty to sex trafficking in federal court in San Diego.

Pratt pleaded guilty Thursday to conspiracy to sex trafficking from 2012 to 2019 and sex trafficking a victim in 2012 of the superseding indictment, according to a U.S. Department of Justice news release.

Sentencing for Pratt, 42, is scheduled for Sept. 8 before U.S. District Judge Janis L. Sammartino.

He liquidated his assets and fled from the United States in 2019. He was named to the FBI's Top Ten Most Wanted list until his arrest in Spain on Dec. 22, 2022, and was extradited to San Diego in March 2024.

Pratt was charged in October 2019 in the Southern District of California in connection with deceiving and coercing hundreds of young women from the United States and Canada to appear in pornographic videos.

Pratt and his co-defendants used force, fraud and coercion on the women -- mostly in their late teens -- to appear in GirlsDoPorn videos, the Department of Justice said.

During court hearings, victims detailed how they had lost jobs, were evicted, dropped out of school or was disowned by friends and family. Some attempted suicide.

According to prosecutors, Pratt sometimes transported the women to and from the site of the video shoot at hotels or short-term rental units in the San Diego area.

The prospective models were told the video would never be posted online or released in the United States.

In 2012, Pratt recruited co-defendant Matthew Wolfe, now 43, to work for him. They also developed GirlsDoToys out of the same office in San Diego.

With million of views, they posted video content on free porn sites such.

The websites charged visitors a subscription fee to access content, and generated $17 million in revenue for them, according to prosecutors.

In 2013, Pratt recruited another co-defendant, Ruben Andre Garcia, a male model who engaged in sex acts on video with the women. Garcia is now 36.

Prosecutors said Pratt and other members of the conspiracy ensured that the victims did not find out they owned and operated GirlsDoPorn and GirlsDoToys.

If the women said they wanted to stop making the video, the co-conspirators threatened to sue the women, cancel flights home and post the videos online, prosecutors said.

In May 2012, Pratt used the alias "Matt" to recruit Victim 1 for modeling and posted an ad on Craigslist as Bubblegum Casting.

The victim, who was 18, was told the job was actually to shoot an "adult video" but was falsely told it would only be seen in Australia by private clients and would not be posted on the internet.

The victim was persuaded to fly from a state outside of California to San Diego for the video shoot at a hotel. Pratt told the FBI he gave the victim $2,000.

Garcia was sentenced to 20 years in prison on June 14, 2021; Theodore Gyi, 47, who served as a photographer, four years on Nov. 9, 2022; Wolfe 14 years on March 20, 2024. Valorie Moser, 42, the office manager, is set for sentencing on Sept. 12.

"I can remember being so worried to tell him [Garcia] that I was just 17," a woman told the court during a hearing for Garcia. "But he was not mad or concerned. Instead, he was excited and was eager to start."
 
There are no females under the age of 18 in porn
???
There's ongoing lawsuits with pornhub about that
Not to mention one of the girls involved with GDP claim they were 17 during shooting

Ofcourse you can call them a liar, but it would be detrimental to their case to lie, and pornographers have very few, if any morals, so I absolutely believe it.

Also, saying there are no girls under 18 in porn is silly when there's a literal term for that.
 
It's not about minors, it's just about flying them around, or else they would have hit them age related charges. The GirlsDoPorn stuff is just scumbag guys tricking dumb sluts, at least one of whom was effectively cheating on her deployed military boyfriend or fiance, to probably no vet's surprise. It's good that the guys running the site are getting legally fucked, but don't shed too many tears for the women involved.
No, it isn't good. It's just another symptom of our gynocentric society where women suffer no consequences for their actions. It's also one of the reasons why it's falling apart.
???
There's ongoing lawsuits with pornhub about that
Not to mention one of the girls involved with GDP claim they were 17 during shooting

Ofcourse you can call them a liar, but it would be detrimental to their case to lie, and pornographers have very few, if any morals, so I absolutely believe it.

Also, saying there are no girls under 18 in porn is silly when there's a literal term for that.
I am talking about professional porn. Not some 22 year old dude uploading a video of himself banging his 16 year old girlfriend.

Women lie all the time. I know sugar spice and everything nice bitches would never lie to get their way.
 
Learn2read.
>Women lie all the time. I know sugar spice and everything nice bitches would never lie to get their way
Aka, even if they outright say they were underaged at the time, we should just not believe them at all because women always lie

15iq logic

Again, she has very little reason to lie since any lawyer would tell her it would just hurt her case
 
There are no females under the age of 18 in porn. They are all adults and know what they are doing and getting into.

There are no minors involved.

Now go be a faggot somewhere else.
Nigga did you even read.
"I can remember being so worried to tell him [Garcia] that I was just 17," a woman told the court during a hearing for Garcia. "But he was not mad or concerned. Instead, he was excited and was eager to start."
 
Do you have a way to verify that all the porn you watch doesn't have any minors in it, or do you just not care because you're a slave to your goon sessions?
Professional porn has age verification requirements. No one works unless they are 18+.

Now fuck off faggot.
Nigga did you even read.
Yes dumbass. I know how to read.
 
Craigslist, the premier venue for businesses on the up & up looking to advertise no-skill jobs that are quick and pay big. JFC some people have no common sense.

It's alway ethical to rig TNT to a pono'kikes car in Minecraft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
It's very dumb that porn is okay but only if you don't fly the women in from elsewhere. The problem is making and distributing porn, not some bullshit technicalities.

Do you have a way to verify that all the porn you watch doesn't have any minors in it, or do you just not care because you're a slave to your goon sessions?
The burden of ethical production doesn't fall on the consumer, I don't know if everything I buy has no ties to child slave labor in sweatshops or whatever. Porn should mainly be banned because it's immoral, those other concerns are secondary.

There are no females under the age of 18 in porn. They are all adults and know what they are doing and getting into.
That doesn't make it okay.
 
Last edited:
Porn as a commercial product is going to be pretty heavily vetted legally because the Jews bankrolling it don’t want to have to flee back to Israel just yet. Genuine amateur (and not just astro-turfed still studio-produced “amateur”) porn is where the abuse happens, and someone pretty much has to go out of their way to find it… on top of it being either someone’s very specific fetish or the most bland formula imaginable, neither of which will really be attracting a wider net of attention.

All that being said, imagine watching porn, just find a white woman and do the needful.
 
The whole concept of "sex traffic" has lost all meaning already. Remember that chic on twitter saying she was a survivor of sex trafficking and at the end, she was just a willing participate grifter? You doing porn and the pornographers treating you badly ain't being a victim of sex traffic.

The victim, who was 18, was told the job was actually to shoot an "adult video" but was falsely told it would only be seen in Australia by private clients and would not be posted on the internet.
I know she's a victim, but she's also dumb.

There was a 90s soap opera where a woman had done not porn but some very racy nude photoshoot in Paris when she was younger (likely in her early 20s), with the promise that it would only be published in a small local magazine. She did so because her mother was sick and needed the money. Twenty years later, she let it slip by mistake to the villain, a woman pretending to be her friend, and she travelled to Paris to get the pictures, which she did and used them to blackmail her.

Yeah, this is just fiction, but even then, the lesson is that things like this never remain in the past but they always hunt you and always will be let go into the wild eventually. If it exists, someone will see it.

Porn should mainly be banned because it's immoral, those other concerns are secondary.
It's also exploitative. Many performers aren't mentally well. If companies were forced to make psychological tests before hiring them, there would be like only ten actresses.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: frozen_runner
The Farms going full church lady about porn will never not be :story: -worthy.
Sex and even eroticism is fine. Porn is a different thing. Eating is something you need to survive. Even indulge with some treats once in a while is fine. But gluttony is not just a sin, it's just bad for you, physically and emotionally. Porn is the same. It's not healthy sexuality and it's often highly damaging for the performer.
 
Back