Lolcow Andrew Peter Carlson / Anaiah Carlson / Tamarlover / Xtamarlover - Jewish/Christian Wannabe Cult Leader, Stalker, Ugly af, dogfucker, mayor of spitsville

You have just started to discuss flogging the disobedient.

Is flogging something you expect to engage in when you get married? Would a woman who was not obeying or following house rules be subject to flogging?
Flogging is reserved for the homeless indentured servants. I imagine that's what his informal justice system is about. Floggings for all who displease master!

Don't worry too much about your possible floggings @hood LOLCOW, this emaciated fuck couldn't even lift a bullwhip let along strike anything with it.
 
You have just started to discuss flogging the disobedient.

Is flogging something you expect to engage in when you get married? Would a woman who was not obeying or following house rules be subject to flogging?

She herself thinks flogging should be done for people who deserve it. She can flog me but I would never flog her. If she or my children ever deserved to be flogged, I would do everything I could to appease the one who deserves to flog them. The right to flog is a choice which can only be approved by a governing authority and not on a personal level. And there are alternatives to flogging if those involved agree to the alternatives.

Flogging is reserved for the homeless indentured servants. I imagine that's what his informal justice system is about. Floggings for all who displease master!
There has to be checks and balances. If someone consents to being flogged if they do certain wrong things, it is not wrong. Also it has to be that I don't have all the power. There will have to be a balance where I can't do whatever I want. So if I want someone to be flogged, I have to get the council's permission.

If you cared about her, you'd just leave her alone

And if you all cared about her, you'd all leave her privacy alone and only post things that make me look bad, and not post her private personal life for everyone to see.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does this kid sleep? If he spent as much time as he does being obsessed with people on the internet in a theology degree, his novellas might make some sense. Then again, there aren't a lot of whips in university for the flogging enthusiast. It's hard out here for a cult leader.
 
It makes you look pretty bad.

reread what i said before that. I said the ones with her private messages to me doesn't make me look bad. What i explicitly said is that the ones that DO make me look bad are fine to share as I deserve that. but she doesn't have the ones which DON'T make me look bad to be shared since they have no reason to be shared and have private details of her life in them. So that was wrong and disrespectful to her by him doing that.
 
Even though I think most of all you are creeps and sick fucks who deserve horrible things happening to you, at the same time, I am partially glad to have met you because you remove all desire to make new videos and post them for her to see. Which ultimately is a good thing. So while you are jerks and morally wrong for doing that, I cannot help but appreciate that a little bit for helping my situation. Also I have made a friend so I'm glad for that too. But you guys still deserve to be flogged. I would gladly personally flog each one of you who disrespected me and cherish every scream. But hood lolcow deserves a special treatment. Unfortunately the law only allows forty floggings maximum. But I would personally give him the maximum. And then post the video for everyone's enjoyment. Unfortunately thats not the world we live in. But that would be ideal.
The first thing cows do when they discover they have a thread on here is to politely request that their information be removed.

The second thing they do is chimp out when they discover that it won't be.

Guess which one you're on.
 
reread what i said before that. I said the ones with her private messages to me doesn't make me look bad. What i explicitly said is that the ones that DO make me look bad are fine to share as I deserve that. but she doesn't have the ones which DON'T make me look bad to be shared since they have no reason to be shared and have private details of her life in them. So that was wrong and disrespectful to her by him doing that.
No, they still make you look bad.
 
The first thing cows do when they discover they have a thread on here is to politely request that their information be removed.

The second thing they do is chimp out when they discover that it won't be.

Guess which one you're on.

I'm not asking anyone to remove MY information. i'm asking them to remove HER information. Because the information posted sharing her messages doesn't go against me and doesn't make me look bad in the slightest. But it violates her privacy. If i were to actually take you seriously about you even caring about her wellbeing, you wouldn't be plastering her privacy everywhere. Instead you'd only be posting the things that damage my reputation. Instead what was posted doesn't damage my reputation it just violates her privacy and makes you look bad. Only the messages in that batch that make me look bad should be posted. All the other ones are irrelevant and should not be shared out of respect to her. There's nothing in those messages I am ashamed. Except in the ones I'm giving you permission to share. The ones I am saying you do not have a right to share are the ones in which there is nothing in them that I am ashamed of. So you don't accomplish your purposes by posting those. Instead you make yourselves look like insensitive assholes. And not insensitive towards me. Insensitive towards her.
 
I'm not asking anyone to remove MY information. i'm asking them to remove HER information. Because the information posted sharing her messages doesn't go against me and doesn't make me look bad in the slightest. But it violates her privacy. If i were to actually take you seriously about you even caring about her wellbeing, you wouldn't be plastering her privacy everywhere. Instead you'd only be posting the things that damage my reputation. Instead what was posted doesn't damage my reputation it just violates her privacy and makes you look bad. Only the messages in that batch that make me look bad should be posted. All the other ones are irrelevant and should not be shared out of respect to her. There's nothing in those messages I am ashamed. Except in the ones I'm giving you permission to share. The ones I am saying you do not have a right to share are the ones in which there is nothing in them that I am ashamed of. So you don't accomplish your purposes by posting those. Instead you make yourselves look like insensitive assholes. And not insensitive towards me. Insensitive towards her.
...Says the guy who's stalking her.
9d5.png
 
...Says the guy who's stalking her.
9d5.png

As I said, if you had watched the video, you would have seen there are 32 different types of stalkers. And i'm the least troublesome type of all the types. fact. I care more about her wellbeing than all of you combined.

Oh, fuck.

Hmmm.

We'll get over it.

Maybe you should get over it
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As I said, if you had watched the video, you would have seen there are 32 different types of stalkers. And i'm the least troublesome type of all the types. fact. I care more about her wellbeing than all of you combined.

> stalking = caring

Yep you're delusional and controlling as fuck

Looks like someone getting mad guys

72c.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@tamarlover you mentioned in your commune that there would be "vigilante justice" for people who don't follow the rules, what would it be? would it be flogging? wouldn't that be illegal?
 
@tamarlover you mentioned in your commune that there would be "vigilante justice" for people who don't follow the rules, what would it be? would it be flogging? wouldn't that be illegal?

Here's my belief. If someone is raped or murdered, they as well as any of their immediate closest relatives have the right to kill the person. We will not tell them they should do it. But we will not tell them its wrong either. So if we happen to find out people did that, we wouldn't turn them in. If someone permanently disables or dismembers someone else, that person or their immediate closest relatives have the right to disable or dismember the person to the same extent. We will not tell them they should do it. But we will not tell them its wrong either. So if we happen to find out people did that, we wouldn't turn them in. And if someone steals from you, you have the right to steal back what is owed to you. We will no tell them they should do it. But we will not tell them its wrong either. So if we happen to find out people did that, we wouldn't turn them in. This would not be confined to the community but it would be tolerated across the country. Flogging isn't illegal if its consensual. You could draw up a contract saying as being part of the community I voluntarily submit myself to being flogged if necessary for the following crimes. I at any time can refuse the punishment of flogging with the understanding that if I refuse I may be banned from the community as a result. So in order to protect the safety of the community we would not be allowed to call for or organize the illegal activities. But we can choose to turn a blind eye to what some people might do on their own initiative if we think they have the right to do and deserve to be protected from the eyes of the Law. We would encourage the people to take resource to the government instead for certain crimes and that vigilante justice should only be as a last resort and if you feel like thats the only way to make things right. But we will warn them if you do that and the government finds out and arrests you, there isn't much we can do to help you. So you take the risk upon yourself to take it into your own hands.
 
Back