US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If they do have a nuke then it's going to solve several problems in an instant no more Palestine, no more Israel. Forever sand wars canceled.
If I were Iran and just made my first nuke ever but want it to actually make it's way to it's target in this day and age I'd stick it onto a supersonic missile and there's only one target in range for that.
Considering Israel's nuclear policy, that's the end of the rest of the middle east right there lol
 
This reminds me of the time CTR chimped out in the Shiloh Hendrix thread by saying how mean it was for a white woman to protect her property and say nigger to a nigger.
Gee for an American who supposedly hates browns and loves whites he sure was quick to say that black people should never face consequences and white people should never fight back.

Of course he got rocked so hard he had to take a break from the thread and returned to apologize to his betters.

We should count ourselves blessed to see it happen again.
didn't one of hitler's guys write something along the lines of "call them a liar and a scoundrel and it'll run off of them like water on a raincoat but call them a duplicious jew and they'll shirk away because they've been found out"?

the guy's a literal self-identifying zionist yeshiva who i've seen claim to be both an american and an israeli so good luck trying to get any straight answers out of the guy
 
Surely even a nation that’s stupid enough to believe in Islam understands the concept of mutually assured destruction, right? I don’t think anything is going to come out of this.
That's the nature of the disagreement there. A lot of folks (myself included) believe they aren't going to blow up a neighboring country and risk getting their shit wiped off the map. Other's think they are a genocidal death cult that would.
 
Surely even a nation that’s stupid enough to believe in Islam understands the concept of mutually assured destruction, right? I don’t think anything is going to come out of this.
They worship a child rapist prophet and blow themselves up regularly. They are not rational people.
 
Surely even a nation that’s stupid enough to believe in Islam understands the concept of mutually assured destruction, right?
Destruction may be mutually assured in this life, yes, but only one side will be met by Allah at the gates of paradise with 72 virgins.
 
Buying a used tire from the local pick and pull is more dangerous, but buying new tires at Walmart and having their techs pull off the rims, mount the new tire and balance it is what i consider the most dangerous.
I worked at a Sam’s club back in like the year 2000

The tire department guys gave these people back their car with nice new tires, but forgot to put the lugs on

Lol. Walmart IS dangerous
 
Surely even a nation that’s stupid enough to believe in Islam understands the concept of mutually assured destruction, right? I don’t think anything is going to come out of this.
No, them being insane muzzies makes them even more likely to strike first. Their whole pedo neanderthal religion revolves about killing infidels to get 72 child brides.

It doesn't require a drop of philosemitism to recognize that Iran are hellraisers and that nothing good can come from them having nukes.
 
They worship a child rapist prophet and blow themselves up regularly. They are not rational people.
in relative terms iran is, but that's in relative terms, iraq and iran both are notably more level-headed and secular than say, afghanistan or pakistan

they'll still talk rabid shit but they're not going to do the same level of bone-headed retard you would see from either one of the backwaters of the global backwater
 
You...you do realize what Medieval Knights did, right?
"European Christian's banding together to retake former Roman Christian lands from the encroaching Islamic Caliphate and free Christian's in the holy land having to live under Arabnigger rule is LITERALLY the same as going to war with Iran for the modern Rabbinic Jewish state of Israel"
GtGIM3OWYAAScLC.webp
 
Surely even a nation that’s stupid enough to believe in Islam understands the concept of mutually assured destruction, right? I don’t think anything is going to come out of this.
if leadership is a bunch of islamic fanatics who believe that a martyrs death is a glorious achievement that guarantees gods favor in the afterlife then MAD doesn't really work the way it does with more rational opponents

but if military action is taken, i hope they learned that boots on the ground is a mistake. wipe out the regime, annihilate leadership, scatter the revolutionary guard, then watch from afar as the country descends into chaos. do not repeat the mistake of getting sucked into yet another never ending occupation, let the jews and the turks and the saudis deal with the aftermath and clean up the mess as they see fit.
 
Pakistan isn't run by insane mullahs who come from a tradition of suicidal attacks and who worship the idea of dying in jihad.
That's just Islam.
As for proxy shipments, North Korea has a long tradition of that as well and also possess nuclear capabilities. They actually semi-recently delivered missiles to Yemen. However in spite of the hostility and having the motive, North Korea has done no such thing either.

Iran is already on the decline as an influence in the region, becoming less capable of supporting their proxy networks and are even having something of a crisis within government due to a constant string of failures regarding foreign policy.
 
Back