Kino Casino - Read Kiwifarms with abortionist A-a-andy Warski and lardy PPP. A lolcow drama show. 2/28/2019, never forget.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Warski is the only sektur personality i know other than rand that has appeared on the daily shoah and many other alt-right shows multiple times.
JFG and Ethan Ralph are a part of the Sektur too. I'm not sure what you're trying to say. The Sektur practically spawned because of faggot race right autism streams. Oh, and Baked Alaska too. Also Nicholas Fuentes, Halsey English and that other Jew who dated a pornstar. They've all been on many "alt-right" shows.
 
It really is sad seeing a bunch of desperate LOSERS trying to yank down a great pair of entertainers! This "sektur" you pretend to like is held aloft on the soft jiggly shoulders of PPP! You wouldn't have half of the things you claim to enjoy if it wasn't for his labors!

When he puts on the cow paint, when he screams woah buddy, when he commands warski to stop being retarded long enough to get something done. You think he's doing that for himself? No buddy! He's doing it for you.

Ungrateful, autistic hanger ons. Desperate to pull a man down from heights they could never reach.

Kino casino is a ROLE MODEL for entertainers everywhere. And if you disagree you should KILL YOURSELF.
 
Fuck, it, I'll bite the bullet and provide the timestamps.

So at 24:16 he shows uncensored pictures of children in their underwear, at 29:41 he shows a full body shot of a little girl in nothing but a string bikini top with her crotch visible, aaaand fuck you and @Null for saying this was censored JC Penney catalog level content I'm not watching the rest of this.
2:40
1749748253575.webp

Is girls willingly posing Infront of the camera, non-nude, one girl is posing with her swimwear

So when you got to beach and see children do you get reminded of porn?
are you turned on by children's faces?
 
2:40
View attachment 7492956
Is girls willingly posing Infront of the camera, non-nude, one girl is posing with her swimwear

So when you got to beach and see children do you get reminded of porn?
are you turned on by children's faces?
2:40 isn't any of the timestamps he provided, and i don't think you should provide the timestamps he provided. ACTUALLY DON'T DO THAT. I AM NOT TROLLING DON'T FUCKING DO THAT.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cyraxian Horror
Fuck, it, I'll bite the bullet and provide the timestamps.

So at 24:16 he shows uncensored pictures of children in their underwear, at 29:41 he shows a full body shot of a little girl in nothing but a string bikini top with her crotch visible, aaaand fuck you and @Null for saying this was censored JC Penney catalog level content I'm not watching the rest of this.
I'm pretty sure there's more. I think they tried to censor some of them, where I made the argument that censoring such photos can make it even worse.

Look, I don't think Tardski is a nonce and the all caps clearly does make the thread hard to read for some but he's a total retard that brought this onto himself. What even went through his mind when he thought it was a good idea to accept that gigabytes of lewd imagery and gloat about FBI involvement in his streams? It was so bad, even ETHAN RALPH wouldn't use that stream against him, because he participated too.

Total retard grifter behaviour.
 
2:40
View attachment 7492956
Is girls willingly posing Infront of the camera, non-nude, one girl is posing with her swimwear

So when you got to beach and see children do you get reminded of porn?
are you turned on by children's faces?

That's nice. Now post an image of the second time stamp if you're so confident it isn't CSAM.
 
2:40
View attachment 7492956
Is girls willingly posing Infront of the camera, non-nude, one girl is posing with her swimwear

So when you got to beach and see children do you get reminded of porn?
are you turned on by children's faces?
Incredible and tottally predictable that when given actual timestamps BTFOing your point, you once again move the goalpost, and show something that ISN'T in the timestamps provided to continue you're defense. Just shut the fuck up, Josh is a much better Janny than you when it comes to sweeping for this.
 
That's nice. Now post an image of the second time stamp if you're so confident it isn't CSAM.
ok, so you just confirm you are completely blind, that girl is wearing pants, loser
are you telling me that this entire thread has been ruined because retards can not use their eyes properly

you are the definition of sad pathetic, liars, give you the benefit of the doubt if you are a blind tho, though a part of me would wish you go completely blind and never be able to use this site again.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Americunt
Incredible and tottally predictable that when given actual timestamps BTFOing your point, you once again move the goalpost, and show something that ISN'T in the timestamps provided to continue you're defense. Just shut the fuck up, Josh is a much better Janny than you when it comes to sweeping for this.
I feel like sweeping is having the opposite effect...

Edit:

ok, so you just confirm you are completely blind, that girl is wearing pants, loser
are you telling me that this entire thread has been ruined because retards can not use their eyes propertly

you are the definition of sad pathetic, liars, give you the benefit of the doubt if you are a blind tho, though a part of me would wish you go completely blind and never be able to use this site again.
It's not in the timestamps he provided though. And i unironically suggest that you don't post whatever is there because in this guy's words... ITS VERY BAD... Those descriptions pass the Dost test with flying colors.
 
If you're accusing him of a crime as serious as streaming CSAM, you should make some attempt to apply a legal standard. I saw the post with the timestamps and no one disagrees that it's distasteful, creepy, and weird what he did, but again, it almost certainly doesn't rise to the level of CSAM. You can't go around accusing people of crimes because you don't like them.

I don't like PPP or Warski. They're both cocksuckers. But what you're all doing is wrong.
 
Look at dongas eyes little lying faggot, look into his eyes in my profile picture.

realize that your eyes are even more defective than his googly retarded looking eyes, how does that make you feel bish?
 
ok, so you just confirm you are completely blind, that girl is wearing pants, loser
Okay so post it then if he's blind and you're so confident it isn't obscene and disgusting. Actually like ABG said, please don't, but the fact you haven't tells all of us all we need to know about how shallow your defense of this is.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: All becomes gunt
Okay so post it then if he's blind and you're so confident it isn't obscene and disgusting. Actually like ABG said, please don't, but the fact you haven't tells all of us all we need to know about how shallow your defense of this is.
all the alleged timestamps the csam (narrative) enjoyers like you have provided have been deBOOnked right here right now.

its over for the the ALLCSAMERS, is this what you wasted joshes time for ?
slit the wrists, the wrists your retarded bullshit typing fingers inhabit on.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Americunt
If you're accusing him of a crime as serious as streaming CSAM, you should make some attempt to apply a legal standard. I saw the post with the timestamps and no one disagrees that it's distasteful, creepy, and weird what he did, but again, it almost certainly doesn't rise to the level of CSAM. You can't go around accusing people of crimes because you don't like them.

I don't like PPP or Warski. They're both cocksuckers. But what you're all doing is wrong.
I posted the 6 clues for the Dost test and according to this man's description here:
Fuck, it, I'll bite the bullet and provide the timestamps.

So at 24:16 he shows uncensored pictures of children in their underwear, at 29:41 he shows a full body shot of a little girl in nothing but a string bikini top with her crotch visible, aaaand fuck you and @Null for saying this was censored JC Penney catalog level content I'm not watching the rest of this.
  1. Whether the focal point of the visual depiction is on the child's genitalia or pubic area. :agree:
  2. Whether the setting of the visual depiction is sexually suggestive, i.e., in a place or pose generally associated with sexual activity. :?:
  3. Whether the child is depicted in an unnatural pose, or in inappropriate attire, considering the age of the child.:agree:
  4. Whether the child is fully or partially clothed, or nude.:agree:
  5. Whether the visual depiction suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual activity.:?:
  6. Whether the visual depiction is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer.:agree:
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cyraxian Horror
You can't go around accusing people of crimes because you don't like them.
Funny, the Casino does this alot, it's called "Gilding the Lily". I'd maybe agree that Warski wouldn't be on the hook for distribution with that stream (Though we don't know what he DIDN'T show, and allegedly had locally on his hard drive) But really that's beside the point. Would THEY be as charitable if one of their cows did this? Or would they fire up a stream called "REVIEW TECH USA STREAMED CP"
 
Can everyone just move past all this BS and just return to alogging Lard and Tard?

I agree the names of the report fags should be posted as they are massive faggots. If you don’t like AllBecomesGunt’s posts than just ignore him.

The last several pages of birching have been more annoying than the Red Caps signature message at the end of ABG’s posts.
 
Funny, the Casino does this alot, it's called "Gilding the Lily". I'd maybe agree that Warski wouldn't be on the hook for distribution with that stream (Though we don't know what he DIDN'T show, and allegedly had locally on his hard drive) But really that's beside the point. Would THEY be as charitable if one of their cows did this? Or would they fire up a stream called "REVIEW TECH USA STREAMED CP"
How is it gilding the lily if the Dost test applies and is a pass to jury instructions to what the man described above though ?
Edit: To all the sweepers btw, congratulations, the situation has gotten magnitudes worse.
 
Funny, the Casino does this alot, it's called "Gilding the Lily". I'd maybe agree that Warski wouldn't be on the hook for distribution with that stream (Though we don't know what he DIDN'T show, and allegedly had locally on his hard drive) But really that's beside the point. Would THEY be as charitable if one of their cows did this?
Lmao Milksports literally just said that earlier in his post

2:40
Is girls willingly posing Infront of the camera, non-nude, one girl is posing with her swimwear

So when you got to beach and see children do you get reminded of porn?
are you turned on by children's faces?
So which is it? is the Casino being lying liars when they talk about review tech ? Or are you saying that its fucking creepy to have those type of photos like how the Casino says with dickers? You must REALLY want to lick Warski's gunt grease with the fact you are obsessing over legalisms of whether or not something is CP or not. He botched a pedo sting, that should be enough for anybody to see he's a piece of shit.
 
Back