US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree, and it's very much a cope for demoralization and inaction. There's a good meme that says "if you want to paint a house red, you're going to need plenty of blue paint!" which sums everything up nicely.

Accelerationism gets pushed a lot on /pol/ because it appeals to autistic rage ("IT'S NOT PERFECT AND THE NORMIES ARE CONFOUNDING ME! KILL EVERYTHING!") while discouraging the autistic tendency towards repetitive tasks and niche interests (which would be good for the drudgery of non-violent political change. It seems to get more pushback now...
Part of accelerationism is a realization that its literally impossible to undo or fix certain problems once they take root. You have to build a new structure. The USA was people leaving rotten Europe and building something new. Now there is nowhere left to go, so you will have to build on top of something existing.

Under our current system the following will never be fixed:
*mass benefit programs like social security that are unsustainable
*corporate privileges
*police being the worst of all worlds where they wont protect you but will make you obey globohomo
*feminism and the sexual revolution which has maybe permanentely damaged man and woman relations and maybe poisoned many people with all the birth control in the water and the rise of single motherhood
*the civil rights act

We are finding out now if genocide intended immigration can be voted on right now.

Explain to me how you will convince women to give up their numerous special privileges again?
 
Most countries, the smart ones anyway, when conducting war, usually go out of their way to not antagonize their enemy's allies because it will lead to them entering the conflict as well.
We're involved already. When every news station and politician treats panic in Tel Aviv as panic here it's pretty obvious that we're defacto seen as a combatant
 
Fuck the jannies for featuring this as the riot thread. Now its just back to endless jew and sand nigger sperging. I want my riot clips and updates.

For those interested, there is a dedicated riot thread on life support:
 
We're involved already. When every news station and politician treats panic in Tel Aviv as panic here it's pretty obvious that we're defacto seen as a combatant
Not to the degree Israel is. Iran might strike our bases but they won't strike our civilian populations. They have a convoluted reasoning under Islamic law to kill Israeli civilians because they rationalize that universal conscription of both men and women renders the entire population a military target. It's why you don't see Iranian state terrorism against soft targets in the West like you do Salafi ones. It's always targeted at military installations and leadership, not a Taylor Swift concert.
 
They have a convoluted reasoning under Islamic law to kill Israeli civilians because they rationalize that universal conscription of both men and women renders the entire population a military target.

They’re not wrong. When almost the entirety of your populace are in some degree of military service “muh civillians” cries fall short.
 
"Civil War" in Palestine, 1947.
View attachment 7498293
Jewish Insurgency in Mandatory Palestine.
View attachment 7498303
"2 committed suicide" lmao
Also lol on the inclusion of the British armed forces, like it was the entire country of Britain versus the insurgents. It was the police and a small garrison, not the entire fucking army.
View attachment 7498310
Attacked in response to immigration restrictions?
:thinking:
View attachment 7498326

I get fighting for your freedom and all that, but yeah to act like Jews are exceptional and different from any other uppity and rather violent group in the Middle East, you're wrong. It's telling the UK preferred to deal with India and its independence than trying to sort out Israel.
If jews were so smart and all powerful wouldn't that make them the master race?
 
I like how this thread went from foreign illegals getting owned by ICE and the NG and Marines to Israel vs Iran and Jewnigger glowie-posting to people now autistically talking about the history of Abrahamic religion and arguing over the tactics of WW2.

You know how we accuse the normies of instantly "forgetting" about a topic when a new thing happens? We seem to have the same problem lmao

At least I'm learning history from watching you all argue with each other about this stuff. Carry on.
 
Back