- Joined
- Apr 28, 2021
There has yet to be a tranny without an uncanny valley face.
2025 Israel vs Iran War
- Thread starter Osama Bin Laden
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
idk if blowing up some empty aboveground offices is going to do anything but annoy some israeli colonel who left his certified ostjuden plum brandy in his upstairs office desk
- Joined
- May 3, 2024
Rich kids in Tehran party while watching the city get attacked:
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2022
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
that looks like a pretty decent spread on the table there. i want some rich iranian kid party food
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2020
There's no confirmation really of this. The only thing stated, even by the New York Times, is that a missile fell in the general area where there are important IDF buildings.
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
He looks like he's been stung by bees.
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2018
It's ironic that you bring up evolution because - in the US at least - it was largely thanks to Jewish anthropologists such as Franz Boas and interest groups like American Jewish Congress and the ADL that social darwinism fell out in favor of egalitarianism and opening up the US to race-agnostic immigration. Specifically, the Immigration Act of 1965. In fact there's an entire chapter about their involvement with changes in US immigration policy in the Culture of Critique, but the cliffnotes version is as follows:
After WWII, Jews in particular were seeking asylum from countries such as Germany (obviously), the Soviet Union, and most of Europe as a whole. The US is an obvious choice given its relative safety from the volatile political climate of early 20th century Europe. This is important because eradicating anti-Semitism, whether it be real or perceived, is the driving force behind all Jewish involvement in US politics from this point onwards, given that substantial anti-Semitic movements occurred in countries with high degrees of religious and/or ethnic homogeneity. There is ample evidence for this from contemporary and modern sources.
Maurice Samuel, prominent author and Zionist, wrote in response to the immigration law of 1924 which restricted Jewish immigration:
"We have just witnessed, in America, the repetition, in the peculiar form adapted to this country, of the evil farce to which the experience of many centuries has not yet accustomed us. If America had any meaning at all, it lay in the peculiar attempt to rise above the trend of our present civilization—the identification of race with State...If, then, the struggle between us [i.e., Jews and gentiles] is ever to be lifted beyond the physical, your democracies will have to alter their demands for racial, spiritual and cultural homogeneity with the State. But it would be foolish to regard this as a possibility, for the tendency of this civilization is in the opposite direction. There is a steady approach toward the identification of government with race, instead of with the political State...To-day, with race triumphant over ideal, anti-Semitism uncovers its fangs, and to the heartless refusal of the most elementary human right, the right of asylum, is added cowardly insult." This is one of the first significant instances in the 20th century of conceptualizing the US as a simple political entity with no regard to ethnicity or race.
From Isaac Siegel, a Jewish New York representative, in the early 1970s:
"'Do you think it could happen here?' “Never was it necessary to define ‘it.’ In almost every case, the reply was approximately the same: ‘If you know history at all, you have to presume not that it could happen, but that it probably will,’ or ‘It’s not a matter of if; it’s a matter of when.’"
From a review of Zionist philosopher Horace Kallen's (who was also a prominent member of the AJ Congress) 1956 Cultural Pluralism and the American Idea:
"Kallen’s view is needed to serve the cause of minority groups and minority cultures in this nation without a permanent majority." (the implication being that Kallen’s ideology of multiculturalism opposes the interests of any ethnic group in dominating the United States)
Earl Raab, a Jewish social scientist and ethnic activist, wrote in the 1990s:
"The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever."
From Louis D. Brandeis, American Zionist in 1915 speaking about open immigration in the US:
"[Immigration would] spiritually enrich the United States and would make it a democracy par excellence."
From David Petegorsky, executive director of the AJ Congress in 1948:
"We are profoundly convinced that Jewish survival will depend on Jewish statehood in Palestine, on the one hand, and on the existence of a creative, conscious and well-adjusted Jewish community in this country on the other. Such a creative community can exist only within the framework of a progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives full expression to the concept of cultural pluralism."
Even as far back as 1881 during yet another immigration debate (Neuringer 1971):
"In undertaking to sway immigration policy in a liberal direction, Jewish spokespersons and organizations demonstrated a degree of energy unsurpassed by any other interested pressure group. Immigration had constituted a prime object of concern for practically every major Jewish defense and community relations organization. Over the years, their spokespersons had assiduously attended congressional hearings, and the Jewish effort was of the utmost importance in establishing and financing such non-sectarian groups as the National Liberal Immigration League and the Citizens Committee for Displaced Persons."
"We have just witnessed, in America, the repetition, in the peculiar form adapted to this country, of the evil farce to which the experience of many centuries has not yet accustomed us. If America had any meaning at all, it lay in the peculiar attempt to rise above the trend of our present civilization—the identification of race with State...If, then, the struggle between us [i.e., Jews and gentiles] is ever to be lifted beyond the physical, your democracies will have to alter their demands for racial, spiritual and cultural homogeneity with the State. But it would be foolish to regard this as a possibility, for the tendency of this civilization is in the opposite direction. There is a steady approach toward the identification of government with race, instead of with the political State...To-day, with race triumphant over ideal, anti-Semitism uncovers its fangs, and to the heartless refusal of the most elementary human right, the right of asylum, is added cowardly insult." This is one of the first significant instances in the 20th century of conceptualizing the US as a simple political entity with no regard to ethnicity or race.
From Isaac Siegel, a Jewish New York representative, in the early 1970s:
"'Do you think it could happen here?' “Never was it necessary to define ‘it.’ In almost every case, the reply was approximately the same: ‘If you know history at all, you have to presume not that it could happen, but that it probably will,’ or ‘It’s not a matter of if; it’s a matter of when.’"
From a review of Zionist philosopher Horace Kallen's (who was also a prominent member of the AJ Congress) 1956 Cultural Pluralism and the American Idea:
"Kallen’s view is needed to serve the cause of minority groups and minority cultures in this nation without a permanent majority." (the implication being that Kallen’s ideology of multiculturalism opposes the interests of any ethnic group in dominating the United States)
Earl Raab, a Jewish social scientist and ethnic activist, wrote in the 1990s:
"The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever."
From Louis D. Brandeis, American Zionist in 1915 speaking about open immigration in the US:
"[Immigration would] spiritually enrich the United States and would make it a democracy par excellence."
From David Petegorsky, executive director of the AJ Congress in 1948:
"We are profoundly convinced that Jewish survival will depend on Jewish statehood in Palestine, on the one hand, and on the existence of a creative, conscious and well-adjusted Jewish community in this country on the other. Such a creative community can exist only within the framework of a progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives full expression to the concept of cultural pluralism."
Even as far back as 1881 during yet another immigration debate (Neuringer 1971):
"In undertaking to sway immigration policy in a liberal direction, Jewish spokespersons and organizations demonstrated a degree of energy unsurpassed by any other interested pressure group. Immigration had constituted a prime object of concern for practically every major Jewish defense and community relations organization. Over the years, their spokespersons had assiduously attended congressional hearings, and the Jewish effort was of the utmost importance in establishing and financing such non-sectarian groups as the National Liberal Immigration League and the Citizens Committee for Displaced Persons."
From the introduction to Grant's 1921 The Passing of the Great Race:
"It is well-nigh impossible to publish in the American newspapers any reflection upon certain religions or races which are hysterically sensitive even when mentioned by name. The underlying idea seems to be that if publication can be suppressed the facts themselves will ultimately disappear. Abroad, conditions are fully as bad, and we have the authority of one of the most eminent anthropologists in France that the collection of anthropological measurements and data among French recruits at the outbreak of the Great War was prevented by Jewish influence, which aimed to suppress any suggestion of racial differentiation in France."
In an address to Congress in 1951, the AJ Congress wrote:
"The findings of science must force even the most prejudiced among us to accept, as unqualifiedly as we do the law of gravity, that intelligence, morality and character, bear no relationship whatever to geography or place of birth."
and cited several of Boas's writings. The American Anthropological Association (of which Franz Boas controlled a two-thirds majority of its executive board) was also instrumental in obtaining support for open immigration.
Margaret Mead, who studied directly under Boas, testified to the "President’s Commission on Immigration and Naturalization" in 1953:
"All human beings from all groups of people have the same potentialities. . . . Our best anthropological evidence today suggests that the people of every group have about the same distribution of potentialities."
"It is well-nigh impossible to publish in the American newspapers any reflection upon certain religions or races which are hysterically sensitive even when mentioned by name. The underlying idea seems to be that if publication can be suppressed the facts themselves will ultimately disappear. Abroad, conditions are fully as bad, and we have the authority of one of the most eminent anthropologists in France that the collection of anthropological measurements and data among French recruits at the outbreak of the Great War was prevented by Jewish influence, which aimed to suppress any suggestion of racial differentiation in France."
In an address to Congress in 1951, the AJ Congress wrote:
"The findings of science must force even the most prejudiced among us to accept, as unqualifiedly as we do the law of gravity, that intelligence, morality and character, bear no relationship whatever to geography or place of birth."
and cited several of Boas's writings. The American Anthropological Association (of which Franz Boas controlled a two-thirds majority of its executive board) was also instrumental in obtaining support for open immigration.
Margaret Mead, who studied directly under Boas, testified to the "President’s Commission on Immigration and Naturalization" in 1953:
"All human beings from all groups of people have the same potentialities. . . . Our best anthropological evidence today suggests that the people of every group have about the same distribution of potentialities."
In the end, the Immigration Act of 1965 was passed and the National Origins Formula was discontinued. The effects of which on the US's demographics and stability are still suffered to this day. Obviously this is heavily abridged and there's a lot more to go into, but for anyone looking to go down the rabbit hole of the history of immigration in the US and the hook noses who were involved (if not outright responsible), it's a good start.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2022
tbf a lot of women with work look like that too
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2016
You like to joke about jews the same way jew comedians like to self-deprecate. It's about as cutting as saying white women like pumpkin spice.
My life is blessed. Not powerleveling but I wouldn't trade my life or situation for anyone in the world.
If you notice outsized influence in US foreign policy that has led to the loss of blood and treasure for zero gain other than knocking out the enemies of a certain Middle Eastern democracy, it must be because you're a loser, you're jealous, the goyim really must be cattle, etc. Anyone who has spent any time in this space has seen people make these arguments before and 99/100 it's by someone with stein, berg, or baum at the end of their name. If you're not jewish, you're not a very clever shabbos goy.
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
'Yes my life is great. FUCKING JEWS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE'
Interesting juxtaposition
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2018
Iran has 80 million+ people, it's pretty large geographically, and it's got several massive ports of entry that it would be pretty easy to smuggle drones through, not to mention a bunch of entry points on its land border that you could use to smuggle in a load of advanced drones. The Taliban have been smuggling in enough heroin into Iran to make them the nation with largest number of heroin addicts per capita for decades, and they're illiterate shepherds, not a highly sophisticated intelligence agency that's spent the last 70 years infiltrating its neighbors to such a high level that they managed to install a Mossad agent to be Syria's Minister of Defense in the 1960's.
As for using US bases, while the Arab countries can and have repeatedly looked the other way whenever an Israeli fighter squadron has crossed their airspace to attack Iranian and Iranian proxy targets, they wouldn't stomach Israelis using bases on their territories to attack another muslim country for fear of the massive backlash they'd face from their populations for helping the Jews. It's the same reason why they've publicly criticized Israel for crippling Hamas while being perfectly happy that the Israelis are destroying an Iranian proxy behind the scenes.
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2024
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
1800 ballistic missiles would be 60% of Iran's entire estimated arsenal. At least half of them don't have the range to reach Israel. And Iran doesn't have the silos and launch vehicles to shoot that many all at once anyway lol
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
Yeah, they could launch more. What sparked this back n fourth to begin with?
Clyde Cash's Left Teste
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2024
For Iran. Because they only have so many missles
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2022
I can plan to get a million.blowjobs but don't expect it's happening
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2020
This was posted by an Iran shill account and is not sourced or matched by anybody else.
They literally post ai combat footage fan art. Probably not very trustworthy.
autistic dog
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2021
Some people hate the jews so much they side with Iran. You hate to see it folks!