- Joined
- Jul 22, 2017
At a glance most of the bugfixes are other contributors. Metux seems mostly focused on moving to XCB and culling lines of code. It's rather ironic that people who say "you can't fix X11, it's TOO OLD AND CRUSTY". Now suddenly "ohnonono you can't clean up the codebase, it's too much churn!". Now we have a fork where metux can chop decades of technical debt that Red Hat has refused to even look at. I support his efforts and path. If I were to fork X11, having never worked on the codebase, the very first thing I'd do would be to start deleting code. Searching for dead #ifdef's and unused variables. That's exactly what metux is doing.These seem at odds with each other if he's infamous for gratuitous compatibility breakage. Also could you point out some bugfixes? I was looking for them earlier and legitimately couldn't find any, but maybe they were just buried under the heap of minor cleanup crap.
His efforts are clearly inspiring others to start looking at the X11 codebase, knowing they're not just going to be blown off by some Red Hat pozlord trying to prevent anyone from reviving the codebase they've desperately attempted to mothball. It's already happening.
Bugfixes
Code Removal/Simplification
Moving to xcb (there's a lot of these)