Chantal Sarault / Chantal Al-Refae / Foodie Beauty - Delusional drug fiend hamplanet mukbanger from Canada trying to be a glamorous online influencer. Pathological liar, huge bitch, narcissist, animal abuser

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Is she manually approving community post comments? Don't have a Youtube account to check, sorry.

Two new comments 1 and 2 hours ago:
New Comments.webp
@H20forlife 1 hour ago
Just sayin' - Love you, and miss you but totally support your ongoing absence. Do what you gotta do, for however long you need
to do it . Your true supporters will be here when you get back. Hope life's treating you ok.

@Bekind0612 2 hours ago
Are you OK? I mean there's war happening by you situation the investigation can you at least let us know you're OK
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
Reactions: BlueIvysAssistant, Chorton, Dead Red and 11 others
30+GameOvers said:
What is with this woman and abusing cats?
Click to expand...
Chantal is deeply misogynist. Cats are universally beloved symbols of feminine beauty, grace, and female sexual power.

30+GameOvers said:
Canadian, you don't have free speech. Yet another lie told by the gunt.
Click to expand...
The right to free speech is enshrined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Another ignorance I'm sick of correcting in this thread. Sorry Americans, you're not special.

Now, does Chantal know about the Charter? Probably not. Does the Charter somehow force foreign countries to respect those rights? Nope. As always, Chantal somehow thinks she's immune to consequences.

Gunt Instinct said:
There happens to be an entire demographic of north American women who share this.
Click to expand...
Come on now, it's hardly just women!

lIllllIiiiiLLLLiiiiIIIIll said:
I mean, debatable.
Click to expand...
Hate speech isn't protected in the US, either. Whether you or I consider it hate speech is irrelevant.

Chantal would NOT be the way she is if she had ever been held accountable for what she said, beyond people on the internet being mad at her. Lmao
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: Swagstika, Jackisnotaname, PussyPTSD and 51 others
30+GameOvers said:
Neat summary. What is with this woman and abusing cats?
Click to expand...
Chantal only cares about herself and sees cats as some kind of mascot or a way to virtue signal. The only reason she went feeding stray cats and acting like a fat babushka with a high pitched voice every time she saw one in a livestream was to stroke her ego.

Many she really likes cats and how cute they are, but longtime watchers know it’s clear Chantal can’t comprehend why others like cats. It’s about more than them looking nice.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Chorton, Guston, Dead Red and 8 others
brooky said:
Hate speech isn't protected in the US, either.
Click to expand...
Incorrect. The US Supreme Court has ruled in multiple cases that there's no such thing as "hate speech" in the USA due to our 1st Amendment protected free speech. The govt can't declare a particular speech to be "hate", nor make it illegal. Matal v Tam was even a unanimous decision with all liberal justices agreeing. Snyder v Phelps was an 8-1 decision, so very strong agreement on the court.

Saying bad words and/or saying the most racist things imaginable is protected. You can walk down the street saying "I wish all niggers would die! Everyone should take away their voting rights!" and that can't be illegal anywhere in US territory. The Phelps decision involved the most inflamatory speech I've ever seen.

The only time a hate crime (enhancement) exists is when there's another crime that's actually causing the charges to be filed. So if you beat a rando Asian with a baseball bat while screaming "Kill the gooks!", you might get a stiffer sentence added to the aggravated assault in certain jurisdictions. But not all jurisdictions.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Interesting Times, Didnt Use Real Email Once, Jackisnotaname and 59 others
Clotso Coof said:
Incorrect. The US Supreme Court has ruled in multiple cases that there's no such thing as "hate speech" in the USA due to our 1st Amendment protected free speech. The govt can't declare a particular speech to be "hate", nor make it illegal. Matal v Tam was even a unanimous decision with all liberal justices agreeing. Snyder v Phelps was an 8-1 decision, so very strong agreement on the court.

Saying bad words and/or saying the most racist things imaginable is protected. You can walk down the street saying "I wish all niggers would die! Everyone should take away their voting rights!" and that can't be illegal anywhere in US territory. The Phelps decision involved the most inflamatory speech I've ever seen.

The only time a hate crime (enhancement) exists is when there's another crime that's actually causing the charges to be filed. So if you beat a rando Asian with a baseball bat while screaming "Kill the gooks!", you might get a stiffer sentence added to the aggravated assault in certain jurisdictions. But not all jurisdictions.
Click to expand...
That's me told, thank you.

Canada still has free speech in the Charter, though. The rest this is all academic.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: BlueIvysAssistant, Deine Mutter, Saiga and 23 others
brooky said:
Sorry Americans, you're not special.
Click to expand...


The Constitution Act, 1982, includes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Before the Charter, various statutes protected an assortment of civil rights and obligations but nothing was enshrined in the constitution until 1982.


Looks like we are. The Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791.
 
  • Like
  • Political Sperging
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Jackisnotaname, BlueIvysAssistant, TR0N and 19 others
Can you even imagine if the USA had Arab-style "immorality laws" enforced by imams? Every American in this thread would be sitting in jail or thrown off a roof.

As for Chin's uncharacteristic silence, FFG had a good theory to explain why it's possible Chantal might both be in Canada and unwilling to make an enraged community post repsonding to Atozy's video: Perhaps Smee took Chantal to a lawyer consult in Canada.

The lawyer would have strongly told them Chantal should STFU and take time off youtube if she wants to keep her career, try to keep obsessed fans away (for now) and keep Salah out of trouble back in Kuwait. Maybe Smee put the fear of god into Chins to keep her offline, pledging to throw Cutie out on the street if she disobeys the lawyer.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
  • Disagree
Reactions: Bonkers867, BlueIvysAssistant, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 23 others
Clotso Coof said:
Can you even imagine if the USA had Arab-style "immorality laws" enforced by imams? Every American in this thread would be sitting in jail or thrown off a roof.

As for Chin's uncharacteristic silence, FFG had a good theory to explain why it's possible Chantal might both be in Canada and unwilling to make an enraged community post repsonding to Atozy's video: Perhaps Smee took Chantal to a lawyer consult in Canada.

The lawyer would have strongly told them Chantal should STFU and take time off youtube if she wants to keep her career, try to keep obsessed fans away (for now) and keep Salah out of trouble back in Kuwait. Maybe Smee put the fear of god into Chins to keep her offline, pledging to throw Cutie out on the street if she disobeys the lawyer.
Click to expand...
Honestly, that makes a lot of sense. I have to think a lawyer in Kuwait would say something similar, assuming the two notions can afford to even get a consultation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dead Red
Mayo Style Sauce said:
I remember our indepth conversations about her bizarre “B” belly, back when you could see any definition to her shape. She managed to blow it out to become a full on circle.

View attachment 7507271
Click to expand...
I think the B belly was just the last remaining remnants of the years she wore pants with any real waist band.

If you ever look at thin women in bikinis from the 1960’s they have some bizarre shapes because they had worn very cinched waisted clothing and girdles since their teen years and it effected their fat distribution and shape. Chantal trying to button pants or wearing pants till the waistband burst gave her a double belly fold.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
  • Dumb
Reactions: Thankgodimnot, BlueIvysAssistant, Number One Subaru Fan and 14 others
TrainWreckSpotter said:
Does anyone know if johnbillson is a known Chantal sock?

View attachment 7507939
Click to expand...
Back to Chantal…that sock sounds just like her. Does she have a sock that name? Dunno but she can create one any time. There was a time she had many socks and even made the common error of using “I” in replying under a sock. It wouldn’t surprise me if she revived one.

FFG comes up with crazy ideas. Why would Smee pay for a Canadian lawyer to advise on Kuwaiti or even Canadian laws? If Chantal is in Canada (she isn’t) she is not under the authority of Kuwait and nothing is in danger. And I doubt they’d want to extradite her back for a low level charge.

Of course, she should shut up -she should have started shutting up a decade ago-but nobody has to pay a Canadian lawyer to say that, and she wouldn’t listen anyway if there is nothing hanging over her head.

If anybody thinks Chantal would escape to freedom and spend hundreds of dollars of burger money to help Salah, you haven’t been paying attention. There is nothing a lawyer in Canada can do for her.

If she really wanted Salah out and with her she’d have paid off her debts a long time ago, but she seems to have just started. She only cares about him because it legitimized her desire to be seen as “claimed.” If she could wave a magic wand and get him into Canada she would but the second any self-sacrifice is on the table, she’ll nope out.

They are probably both huddling together in some rancid tiny fleabag room wishing for the luxury of the fartbox and waiting for authorities to make a decision.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Vaporus, Bonkers867, SideEyez and 29 others
Maybe Salah finally snapped, and he got a few pals and a shovel and she's buried up to her chins in the desert, with her camel pals pausing once in a while to hydrate her head with some well-aimed gobs. At this point, fine. But we know she'll come back with a Modest Maryam voice, a platter of cheap food, and an "I needed a break" demeanour having soaked up all of this divine, glorious speculation and attention.

No matter where she is, though, her life could not be more cooked. I have never seen such a tard, both in real life or online, merrily and willingly destroy every conceivable facet of their existence.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Kitty kitty cat, spores, SideEyez and 27 others
Barbarella said:
It’s a race to see if the Rekeita or Chantal thread hits 10k first.

As the race is on, Legal Mindset enters the fray-does he know anything about Kuwaiti law? Do they even have real laws or do they just make shit up as they go?
Click to expand...
Bumping for our bariatric baroness. Not happy that Rekeita gets featured for a tiny toot when Chantal can out shart any man. Rigged, I say.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Kitty kitty cat, Bill Evans 45, often puzzled and 32 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back