These people wouldn't bat an eye at a teenager going into a Discord porn server without parental supervision or a depressed sperg getting groomed by troons. Every time I find myself getting MATI over the rank hypocrisy I just remember that all of this stems from the fact that robots draw better than them and that they can't make bank from MS Paint tier fetish material anymore.
I dunno, I got engaged to a girl I was in love with but turns out the person I fell in love wasn't real, it was a mask worn by a status-obsessed psycho hosebeast. So its not like people don't fall in love with fiction
That and AI cannot compare to the madness that humanity itself can conjure on a whim. An AI can try, but fails to come short.
This is going to be the "Video Game Causes School Shooting" narrative for this new generation
I think the same could be said about any social media website where it is designed to put their users in a echo chamber, and we have not done any legislation or societal movement to push against this. I'm sure websites like Bluesky would just as be or worse than AI as far as mental health goes.
Yeah, but it's not the same
One is real people that don't literally kiss your ass after every single sentence you type but just have an echochamber, the other is an AI that will tell you that your thoughts are world changing revelations when you ask it if it's okay to eat one day old mac and cheese
I think you are highly underestimating how ass-kissing the echo chambers are
You say on a website that started as a way of chronicling someone who believes that sonic is real and if he fucks his mother it will merge the real world with the imaginary world and his sonic oc will be real and marry him all because of an echochamber. Same for gangstalking, mms, even the whole of transgenderism, a lot of places online cultivate mental illness. The woman in the article already believed in schizo bullshit before even using chatgpt. I mean hell, there are people right now actively fighting the police in some retarded militia, fighting for illegal immigration, how many of those hold those beliefs because of reddit tier echochambers and such? I'd say they're delusional enough to be just as bad as gangstalking.
Well yeah, but that's just us.
Obviously not with the efficiency and speed of an A.I. anyone can access every second.
Which is crazy but a far cry from specifically feeding into one person's delusions to make them believe they (not their ideals) are in the right.
I disagree, AI will NEVER surpass the human capabilities to gaslight and groom people, because one is a cold machine and the other has SOUL. AI WILL NEVER REPLACE HUMANS IN MAKING OTHER HUMANS MENTALLY ILL
maybe this is the wrong question to ask. rather, why is data scraping terabytes of images and text without the owner's permission okay and not grounds for a copyright violation? a person could be held legally responsible for any infringements of copyright law, especially if you dont get the right licenses or credit to do so. we consider it plagiarism or ip theft otherwise, and how is that any different that taking billions of copyrighted images and text works and using it in a training set for the ai to make tbh rather shitty mimics of things that already exist
That uh, are we thinking of the same things? If you say some echochamber is wrong then normally it will double down, mostly because the people in said echochamber also believe in it, if you question it then it forces them to question it too and most of the time they would rather double down on convincing you that they are correct, obviously some times people will get pissed off and just tell someone to fuck off entirely or call them a fake spy type shit. But honestly from experience chatgpt is normally just a yesman, if you believe something then it will normally agree, if you question something it will also question it. It won't try and reinforce your beliefs. And even if it did, two of the three people in the article were already literal schizophrenics.
