Programming thread

[Toilet Paper]

homo

ass

Stop posting about Rust! I'm tired of seeing it! My users on GitHub send me "Rewrite it in Rust #1", on the AUR it's fucking cargo pull. I was in a project, right? And all of the code was just unsafe stuff. I showed my compiler to my '(((girl)))friend, and the cargo install command, I used it and I said, "hey babe, when the compiler is For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E1488`. I fucking looked at D-lang and said "Ownership and Borrowing, that's a bit rusty!". I looked at my penis, I think of the Rustacean's clitty and I go "Penis, more like PeWAS!"

AAAAAAAA╕╫▬┲/ Segmentation fault (core dumped)

incredibly
the dom is built around js
removing js would break compatibility with every website that uses it (most of them) and the web standards people don't like doing things like breaking most websites
and i don't really see a huge push to get rid of js (wasm is more meant to be a way to port your c, c++, and c+=hipster programs to the web)

People have invested too much time in making JS fast. I don't think it is going away, ever. The only alternative I can think of for the web is ClojureScript since it compiles to JeetShit.

 

[Jotch]

I keep seeing rust be lauded for memory safety but it just seems like a crutch for people that can't write memory safe code.
Maybe use stack allocation you heathen!

 

[Concentrate Juice]

[schizophrenic episode]

I'm glad you're MATI, but this is very unhinged, you should get that checked out.

Stop posting about Rust! I'm tired of seeing it!

Walk away from your screen like nigga close your eyes. This is the programming thread, not the rust hate thread, even though both are filled with a lot of naive programmers.

 

[Wavebirds]

As for why I sperg out like this, I find it frustrating when you retards observe a huge, industry-wide trend, and just grouch about "kids these days" and give eachother high-fives for being so enlightened instead of even trying to understand the forces that could have caused so many people to converge on the same solution.

I am fairly guilty of, let's call it, "reverse Bad Ass Rock Star Tech" myself.
While corporate development culture and its hipsters deserve criticism, the only way to be better as computer scientists and programmers is by staying on the path of careful analysis and objective argument.
...if a new hire shows up to your workplace with moe clothes and glasses then immediately starts bitching about cloud platforms, Electron, GPTjerk, website NoJS support/motherfuckingwebsite and object-oriented programming, be gentle with me, alright!?

 

[DavidS877]

That sounds like it would lead to a lot of hard-to-debug problems, seeing as you're re-writing the call stack in a way that violates the expectations of a subroutine to return back to where it was called from. How did you manage the new fake call site's code assuming a valid stack frame but getting the real caller's stack frame? Just no local variables or something?

I've already said too much, any more could lead to the repository. Then you'll find out what other atrocities I've committed against programming.

Luckily the bit-banged serial code was in the days before GitHub

 

[Creative Username]

This is the programming thread, not the rust hate thread

this is kiwi farms i&t, not some other websites' i&t equivalent where everybody sucks mozilla's dick and thinks rust is the future of programming
analogy: while we do have dedicated troon hate threads, if you go in other parts of the site and talk about how troons are misunderstood and the nicest people known to man, people will still shit on you in the thread

 

[Kosher Dill]

Stop posting about Rust! I'm tired of seeing it!

Bruh, you know that was trolling, right? (And pretty good trolling, too - hats off)

 

[ChudJack009]

I'm glad you're MATI, but this is very unhinged, you should get that checked out.

Walk away from your screen like nigga close your eyes. This is the programming thread, not the rust hate thread, even though both are filled with a lot of naive programmers.

nigga said filled with naive programmers and linked my account. My fault bro, you're free to like the tranny language all you want, not a soul is stopping you. Call me naive but when the proponents of your language have to bully and force their way into positions of influence (as transvestites always do) by rewriting whole systems and maintaining them on their own insted of building their own stuff most tend to dismiss them. Again maybe im just blithering retard but in my past (and now continued) experience everyone who shills this language has been the most pedantic, annoying faggot I've ever had the displeasure of coming across. My lack of experience is due to my own laziness and inaction, not because I don't want to use your pozzed, sissified C replacement.

Spoiler

I think ive been baited

 

[analrapist]

everyone who shills this language has been the most pedantic, annoying faggot I've ever had the displeasure of coming across

Nailed it, pretty much. Our friend Concentrate adds antisemitism to the ego of the Rusticle, which honestly has its tactical merits. Antisemitism and Rust are both things that have their merits, considered in a vacuum (or not, because vacuums suck). The problem is that the absolutism has to be tempered by the practical reality. Rusticles hammer home the theory because their praxis is as limp as their wrists.

 

[Anti Snigger]

I'm glad you're MATI, but this is very unhinged, you should get that checked out.

Walk away from your screen like nigga close your eyes. This is the programming thread, not the rust hate thread, even though both are filled with a lot of naive programmers.

People like you are why "rust user" is a 4 letter word to the rest of computer science.

 

[Moonson]

nigga said filled with naive programmers and linked my account. My fault bro, you're free to like the tranny language all you want, not a soul is stopping you. Call me naive but when the proponents of your language have to bully and force their way into positions of influence (as transvestites always do) by rewriting whole systems and maintaining them on their own insted of building their own stuff most tend to dismiss them. Again maybe im just blithering retard but in my past (and now continued) experience everyone who shills this language has been the most pedantic, annoying faggot I've ever had the displeasure of coming across. My lack of experience is due to my own laziness and inaction, not because I don't want to use your pozzed, sissified C replacement.

Spoiler

I think ive been baited

Baited award but these types of people are how I learned about Rust. Some queer trying to laugh at me for not being with the times and using Rust. It's very strange to idolize a coding language of all things. Must be the same autism that makes troons into troons.

I keep seeing rust be lauded for memory safety but it just seems like a crutch for people that can't write memory safe code.
Maybe use stack allocation you heathen!

I agree but there is a counter point to this: It is best to have as many safety nets as possible to prevent human error. Even the best coders will make mistakes. With that said, if it sacrifices performance in a task where performance is vital, then it isn't a proper replacement. Everything has its place. I don't think Rust knows its because they seem to push it on everything (MUH RUST MADE APP GUYS!!! RUST ON MUH LINUX DISTRO!!!! RUST FOR WEB DEV!!!!).

Spoiler: picrel

 

[Jotch]

I agree but there is a counter point to this: It is best to have as many safety nets as possible to prevent human error. Even the best coders will make mistakes. With that said, if it sacrifices performance in a task where performance is vital, then it isn't a proper replacement. Everything has its place. I don't think Rust knows its because they seem to push it on everything (MUH RUST MADE APP GUYS!!! RUST ON MUH LINUX DISTRO!!!! RUST FOR WEB DEV!!!!)

I like this sentiment, Rust could be helpful for uses where security is worth more than performance.

 

[Creative Username]

I like this sentiment, Rust could be helpful for uses where security is worth more than performance.

you could just use any random garbage collected language for memory safety if performance is not a concern
rustniggers just love saying "our language replaces every single use case for c and c++ while being way more secure" when such claims are exaggerated at best and downright retarded at worst

 

[Concentrate Juice]

our language replaces every single use case for c and c++ while being way more secure

It literally does and is though, and it's invading all your favourite C and C++ codebases for that very reason. Feel free to live in the past with your 80's fantasy land programming delusion where having a hard head solves every problem forever and always, but the future of programming is in rust, because real software needs real guarantees that you simply can't get in C without 63x the effort, and you can't get the blazingly fast performance in anything else. If you can't handle that trvth nvke, you should probably switch to cleaning airbnbs coz the future of software is going to make you increasingly more mad and jaded and bald that you can't just heckin' go at it with a good attitude and a C compiler just like the good old days, when mossad and the CIA weren't actively looking for ways to kill people in the vicinity of CPUs they can subvert the state machine of because some dunce decided to use C++.

edit: I don't mean you in particular, I mean the indefinite, generic you.

 

[Private Tag Reporter]

presented without comment

blazingly fast

 

[Madison Grant]

I like this sentiment, Rust could be helpful for uses where security is worth more than performance.

Isn't that what languages with garbage collectors are for?

 

[Creative Username]

blazingly fast performance

computers are already fast and that's why you can write 99.9% of any computer software you want to write in fucking python if you want

real software needs real guarantees

half of these guarantees are not even provided by rust which means rust isn't the panacea you think it is

you can't just heckin' go at it with a good attitude and a C compiler just like the good old days

correct, c programmers in the modern era go at it with a hefty dose of paranoia and advanced tools like valgrind, asan, and 27 different fuzzer strategies

anyway if you think c is so bad, go find a buffer overflow in sqlite3 which must have lots of memory safety issues since it was written in c
i will wait

 

[Anti Snigger]

He's just repeating the marketing shit "safe fast safe fast"

 

[Private Tag Reporter]

anyway if you think c is so bad, go find a buffer overflow in sqlite3 which must have lots of memory safety issues since it was written in c
i will wait

Yeah but sqlite is christian software and therefore written by God acting through men.

rust programmers are godless troons and thus incapable of such a feat.

 

[Concentrate Juice]

presented without comment

computers are already fast

You should really work on your bait detection strategies.

c programmers in the modern era go at it with a hefty dose of paranoia and advanced tools like valgrind, asan, and 27 different fuzzer strategies

The things you need to do just to get what rust gives you by default is insane. Just use a gorillion third party tools to make up for what the compiler should be doing.

go find a buffer overflow in sqlite3 which must have lots of memory safety issues since it was written in c

Sqlite3 is the prime example of good software development practices with C so posing a challenge to find buffer overflows in it is clearly in bad faith, even so, let me direct your attention to two memory safety bugs in sqlite3 that rust would have prevented, from just this year.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3277

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-29088

The average C program is nowhere near as robust as sqlite3 is, very few C projects even reach that level, but even when they do, they still have the same flaws that just happen to manifest everywhere C is used.