2025 Israel vs Iran War

U.S. and Israeli intelligence estimate that Israel can sustain missile interceptions for up to 12 days without American support.

By the end of this week, interception success rates may decline, forcing Israel to prioritize which incoming missiles to engage.

Was Fetterman always this pro-Israel? Very curious
No. After he had the stroke he became obsessively Zionist. This doesn't bode well for the intelligence of Zionists tbf
 
Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman told reporters he is a "hell yes" on launching a preemptive strike on Iran to knock out its nuclear capabilities

NOW: The US will join Israel's campaign against Iran, according to Israeli assessments tonight - Channel 12's Nitzan Shapira reports.
I'm pretty sure I've heard the Jews say we're totally gonna enter the war for em every day for the last few days.
 
Was Fetterman always this pro-Israel? Very curious
He's supported anti-BDS laws and made no secret of how super pro-Israel he is since Hamas' opening blow on 10/7, which has left his former supporters on the far-left end of the Democratic camp (who I guess were previously hoping the stroke would change his mind or something?) sneeding hard ever since.
 
He's supported anti-BDS laws and made no secret of how super pro-Israel he is since Hamas' opening blow on 10/7, which has left his former supporters on the far-left end of the Democratic camp (who I guess were previously hoping the stroke would change his mind or something?) sneeding hard ever since.
Yeah I pretty much remember him running as this ultra-progressive and them saying "he's the next big thing" and now, :story: they are dissapointed and seething.
A decision appears to have been made at the meeting and it has been fully coordinated with the State of Israel, according to a source in the Prime Minister's Office.
Here we go..
 
1750191001797.webp
source
 
It's funny to watch the mental gymnastics of those who believe in "might is right" bravado (i.e. wignats and Islamists) cope and seethe about how it's "NOT FAAIIIR!" when they lose.
Setting aside the grifters and schizos whose opinions are either entirely conditional on gibdats/asspats or random access bullshit that is conditional on what manner of episode they are having today, the mentality of "might makes right" autists and their obsession with backing geopolitical weaklings can be explained in a simple chain of retarded logic.
  1. Because the west failed to give them government approved girlfriends and tendies they deserve and refuses to exterminate everyone that /pol/ tier circlejerks or edgy internet grifters say are icky and subhuman and stuff, the west is bad.
  2. Because the west is bad, it must also be degenerate and corrupt and mindless and demoralised, therefore the west is weak.
  3. Because they oppose the west, nations like russia/iran/north korea/china/durka durka militias are automatically exempt from being degenerate and corrupt and mindless and demoralised, therefore they are mighty.
  4. Because they are mighty, they are inherently of higher moral character as shown by half remembered Caesar quotes from Fallout New Vegas and occasionally a mangling of baby's first Nietzsche, therefore they are automatically right
 
Here I hoped that this thread would have, for the most part, stuck to the facts. This thread has turned into a 3-ring circus of twisted views of both religion and history, completely ignoring the actual situation.
yeah maybe staying up for 4 nights in a row to update a war thread on a gossip forum might not have been the best idea

Alon Ben-David (senior military analyst): Iran has 400 kg of uranium enriched to 60%, hidden in unreachable locations — enriching it to weapons-grade doesn’t require many centrifuges, so even with U.S. help, Iran’s nuclear capability can’t be fully eliminated; the goal is a paper agreement.​

 
yeah maybe staying up for 4 nights in a row to update a war thread on a gossip forum might not have been the best idea

Alon Ben-David (senior military analyst): Iran has 400 kg of uranium enriched to 60%, hidden in unreachable locations — enriching it to weapons-grade doesn’t require many centrifuges, so even with U.S. help, Iran’s nuclear capability can’t be fully eliminated; the goal is a paper agreement.​

The push to stop Israel when it has its enemies wholly at its mercy, like in 1967 and 1973, has begun. Israel would do well not to listen this time. Keep bombing Iran until the Iranian government has the choice of surrender or loss of basic ability to govern through physical destruction of its own infrastructure and the country's in general
 
I don't think Iran will respond even if American bunker busters hit their nuclear facilities in the mountain.

The one thing isn't going to happen is an invasion of Iran. It will be strictly bomb, bomb and bomb some more, avoiding civilian areas as much as possible with continued targeted assassinations.
 
Back