UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs

7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See spread happiness's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary


42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See pg often's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.

 

[East_Clintwood]

Other positions available. Apply within.

Can I have Defence? I promise I'll replace every Officer on the grounds that everyone who wanted to be one is a useless poofter by definition. I'll also explain to the Navy that we're an island, and we figured out a long fucking time ago that the solution to stop useless johnny foreigners coming here is to sink the fuckers.

 

[Chunky Salsa]

If we had the sort of people in power that would be interested in making cousin marriage illegal as a way of getting browns to fuck of; we would just be able to deport them all.

 

[>IMPLYING]

Keir Starmer says GB News viewers are not 'far right' for being concerned about grooming gangs

What?!
'Get a grip!' Nigel Farage calls for military action in the Channel as migrant crisis labelled 'national emergency'

Little tip: If you're using Brave and disable scripts on GBnews' website, you'll get no more annoying popups or adblock-turnoff-requests.

 

[Zoot]

>Babies being murdered by having skull smashed in and brains sucked out
>Women most affected

Edit: Farage abstained. Fucking cunt

 

[FedPostalService]

"The French may take our lives, but they will never take our... damn, this yoke they've slapped on us is fucking heavy."

They've got strong competition from Otterly though, don't they?

If this thread descends into civil war the I’m picking up a rifle in Otterly’s name.

 

[Clem Fandango]

Other positions available. Apply within.

I'll take Lord President of the Privy Council. I just want to hold a big fuck off sword during Wills' coronation.

 

[Made In Wales]

View attachment 7518477

>Babies being murdered by having skull smashed in and brains sucked out
>Women most affected

Edit: Farage abstained. Fucking cunt

He was out of the country, but the other four Reform MP's voted against so well done to them.

I'm more angry with the eight Tories who said yes, including the daughter of Fred Dinenage and Kim 'Dumb and Dim' Malthouse.

Keir Starmer says GB News viewers are not 'far right' for being concerned about grooming gangs
View attachment 7518448
What?!
'Get a grip!' Nigel Farage calls for military action in the Channel as migrant crisis labelled 'national emergency'
View attachment 7518461
View attachment 7518454


Little tip: If you're using Brave and disable scripts on GBnews' website, you'll get no more annoying popups or adblock-turnoff-requests.

Good advice.

With their stories, if there's a Paywall, I use removepaywall.com

 

[Zoot]

He was out of the country,

thanks for correcting me. I fell for Xitter propaganda. I'm glad.

The fucking tories though. Almost impossible to be as hated as labour and they elect a BAME leader and vote for baby murder. ffs

 

[Crunkle]

MPs have voted to decriminalise abortion after 24 weeks in England and Wales

It really does get easier to recognise when they try and smuggle bad news in beneath the cover of a bad story.

So, let me get this right. Life is apparently so meaningless as to allow the murder of children, yet precious enough to accept any and every dark face that arrives on a shitty boat illegally?

 

[Tom Nook's Gloryhole]

The entire concept of asylum seekers to begin with is completely broken and the sooner we learn to deal with that the better.

Asylum seekers work when there's a legit demand for people, namely after a major war or pandemic and all of a sudden we need a shitload of adults instead of waiting for a million babies to grow up.

But as it currently stands, hundreds of millions of people would qualify as asylum seekers based on sheer population numbers. We can't simply import the entire third fucking world whenever something kicks off, otherwise why the fuck not just import the whole of Palestine, Pakistan, Syria, Libya etc.

Someone needs to cut asylum off for good, there is genuinely no need for anyone to come to the UK because their life is being threatened. I don't give a fuck about some supposed persecuted Christian from Pakistan (who won't eat pork for some strange reason) or some homosexual who somehow ends up moving to the UK with his heavily pregnant cousin etc.

But the whole Western tolerance has turned the entire first world into easily exploited pushovers, and it's getting worse every year as more and more of these third world shitstains end up coming here 'temporarily' and then they either disappear off the grid or marry a legal third world shitstain and become a British citizen.

If not us, someone else will be the first major first world nation to say "no more" and all of a sudden we'll get their share of Abduls too on top of our regular pile of Abduls.

 

[>IMPLYING]

Good advice.

With their stories, if there's a Paywall, I use removepaywall.com

I couldn't be arsed using an archive site so I just skipped the middleman and used the site I saw you using a handful of times.

But the whole Western tolerance has turned the entire first world into easily exploited pushovers, and it's getting worse every year as more and more of these third world shitstains end up coming here 'temporarily' and then they either disappear off the grid or marry a legal third world shitstain and become a British citizen.

I'm more pissed off at how open a secret it is with Western governments that nobody wants these fuckers in their country that they just ignore the obligation of the seekers to remain in the first safe port of call they reach just to get somewhere riper for the picking. France doing nothing but aiding such people in crossing the channel should constitute a hostile action, but nobody brings it up because it'd potentially result in a diplomatic faux pas. The Tories don't bring it up, Labour don't bring it up, not even Lowe has brought it up. If France does nothing on their end to stop it (Every migrant reaching our shores via a crossing is on them), then we need to do more on ours.


At bare minimum, I suggest we need to set rows of guys along the Southern beaches with my (yet to be patented) Muslim-Deterrer 10000

+

 

[Made In Wales]

It really does get easier to recognise when they try and smuggle bad news in beneath the cover of a bad story.

So, let me get this right. Life is apparently so meaningless as to allow the murder of children, yet precious enough to accept any and every dark face that arrives on a shitty boat illegally?

That would be it, although the 'running for cover' accounts are saying 'oh but the 24 week law still stands and Doctors can't kill babies for shits and giggles... it just means it's decriminalised...'

Two words:

Slippery and slope.

 

[BongoMongo]

I couldn't be arsed using an archive site so I just skipped the middleman and used the site I saw you using a handful of times.

I'm more pissed off at how open a secret it is with Western governments that nobody wants these fuckers in their country that they just ignore the obligation of the seekers to remain in the first safe port of call they reach just to get somewhere riper for the picking. France doing nothing but aiding such people in crossing the channel should constitute a hostile action, but nobody brings it up because it'd potentially result in a diplomatic faux pas. The Tories don't bring it up, Labour don't bring it up, not even Lowe has brought it up. If France does nothing on their end to stop it (Every migrant reaching our shores via a crossing is on them), then we need to do more on ours.


At bare minimum, I suggest we need to set rows of guys along the Southern beaches with my (yet to be patented) Muslim-Deterrer 10000

View attachment 7518796 + View attachment 7518792
View attachment 7518806View attachment 7518813

So long as it doesn't cause a black pudding shortage I am all for it.

 

[Yeeted Teet]

The entire concept of asylum seekers to begin with is completely broken and the sooner we learn to deal with that the better.

Asylum seekers work when there's a legit demand for people, namely after a major war or pandemic and all of a sudden we need a shitload of adults instead of waiting for a million babies to grow up.

But as it currently stands, hundreds of millions of people would qualify as asylum seekers based on sheer population numbers. We can't simply import the entire third fucking world whenever something kicks off, otherwise why the fuck not just import the whole of Palestine, Pakistan, Syria, Libya etc.

Someone needs to cut asylum off for good, there is genuinely no need for anyone to come to the UK because their life is being threatened. I don't give a fuck about some supposed persecuted Christian from Pakistan (who won't eat pork for some strange reason) or some homosexual who somehow ends up moving to the UK with his heavily pregnant cousin etc.

But the whole Western tolerance has turned the entire first world into easily exploited pushovers, and it's getting worse every year as more and more of these third world shitstains end up coming here 'temporarily' and then they either disappear off the grid or marry a legal third world shitstain and become a British citizen.

If not us, someone else will be the first major first world nation to say "no more" and all of a sudden we'll get their share of Abduls too on top of our regular pile of Abduls.

It should only be possible to claim asylum in times of war, in the nearest safe country only, and no naturalisation, permanent residency, anchor babies, or family reunification ever for people who have been granted refugee status. It’s supposed to be a temporary measure that’s only rolled out under extreme circumstances.

Maybe there could be exceptions for those who have made enemies of their government for holding Western values, but there would need to be some hurdles like having a natural citizen who is willing to personally sponsor the application.

 

[BongoMongo]

@Yeeted Teet : I can see the argument for people of our ethnic heritage. An example would be white South Africans or Rhodesians.

But I've tried explaining this to my MP before,to no avail. There are no legitimate asylum seekers or refugees in this country, by the legal definitions of the term. Not. A. Single. One.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

New abortion law is to protect pakis, right?

Nothing to see here. Just another Maternity ward in the UK killing kids

The couple are among 47 new families who have contacted the BBC with concerns about inadequate maternity care at Leeds Teaching Hospitals (LTH) NHS Trust between 2017 and 2024. These include parents who told us their babies died or had been injured, and women who described injury and trauma following inadequate care.

They had all seen our January investigation into the potentially avoidable deaths of 56 babies and two mothers at the trust between 2019 and 2024.

Are you starting to see the nation-wide cover up of kids being killed in the NHS? Is it cohencidence that abortion laws are being pushed and encouraged to help cover up that kids are dying in droves?

Free Lucy, Letbygones be bygones and conduct a national enquiry into all maternity units in the NHS.

 

[Crunkle]

Lucy, Letbygones

Can't be tried for killing children if it's legal to kill children, chud.

 

[Otterly]

If this thread descends into civil war the I’m picking up a rifle in Otterly’s name.

You’re going to get me black bagged … but yeah it is very sad and infuriating that we don’t have people in charge who want to fix stuff. I’d happily pick a cabinet from on here, people seem more honest and effective than the shower we have in power now. I want my country back .
I’d ban bennies for anyone non native. Bennies if you’ve lived and worked and contributed and then got injured in a workplace accident? Ok fine, nothing else. All arrivals need insurance to access the nhs.
Ban halal slaughter, ban non medical circumcision and ban cousin marriage.
Not a single dinghy gets to land. All intercepted offshore if we can, and anyone who sets foot here gets picked up fast and put in a clean, safe, extremely bare bones and dull holding area where they know they have zero chance of entry to the country and will sit, safe and clean and fed of course, until repatriation. Chucked your passport over into the channel? Oh dear, well you’re off to whatever third world hellhole we just bribed with a couple of billion to take you. No more asylum. Points system for genuinely skilled migrants. You married an Aussie hairdresser or doctor or whatever and you want to bring them over? Ok, points system.
Turning off the money tap is the key, it’s our ludicrously generous benefits and ability to work in the black market that’s brought them here.
That faces anyone trying to fix it with an issue - the labour market and ID. I’m wary of any kind of ID stuff because i know what the government will use it for but the ability to pick up easy black market work is another huge driver for illegal migration. We need to do something about that. These guys get a hotel room and a food delivery account of someone else’s and they’re set. That has to be closed off.
Then we have to sort the tax regime out so we are favourable to small business. Everything balanced with GENUINE environmentalism. No more net zero, but if you are discharging PFAS or sewage into the waters you get crucified.
Back to a kind of customs union with Europe but no kind of rule from there. Back to the kind of independent trading partner with customs union is fine.
Power. We need seriously cheap power. Open the pits. Use the coal. That’ll do us twenty years while we spin up a bunch of whatever the safest iteration of molten salt or whatever reactors is, power needs to be cheap as chips. That lets us grow food in greenhouses. It lets us spin up heavy industry again and we need to be very careful we aren’t using that as an excuse to pollute ( net zero can get fucked, pollution is a real concern.)
All factory fishing ships get a friendly torpedo under the waterline.
We protect our people, our waters and lands and air. We create an economy where we know stuff and invent stuff and build and make stuff again. Can we compete with china? No so we go high standard - pharmaceutical manufacturing, let’s get a decent link for taking blue skies stuff all the way to market. Quality steel (fuck it we can salvage the radiation free stuff out of scapa floe and make bank..) high tech manufacturing and R and D. Ships. Subs. Engines. Renationalise water, gas, telecoms, trains etc and the post. Sell it back to us or we just take it, up to you
If we need to be a rapacious free port and have a couple of almost no tax ports/cities then fine. We can glass Birmingham and turn it into a northern Singapore.
Make Britain great again,

 

[FedPostalService]

Pro-choice retard here. Where did this legislation come from? This is the sort of thing I follow and it seems to have came out of the blue? Did the press keep it quiet so there couldn’t be a public campaign against?

 

[Otterly]

Where did this legislation come from?

A pertinent question, and one I’d like to know the answer to. There was no grassroots campaign for this, uk abortion law was Ok as it was