Cultcow Russell Greer / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,448 55.9%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 282 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 606 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,591
Hey, if I'd lost all sensation in the tip of my dick because Daddy had the end chopped off so I had one that looked just like his, I'd be coping and sneeding about it as well.

No one has ever lost sensation from the head of their dick from having nasty foreskin pruned. The ligation method used almost cannot even have accidents that damage the dick in a medical circumcision. (ETA: there have been a statistically insignificant number of accidents.)

I've never understood why some uncut guys feel so defensive about it and try to make up sour grapes claims like 'sex/masturbating dosent feel as good without foreskin because, uh, the head gets dry and nerves die!' Cope and sneed indeed.
 
Last edited:
Clipped guys are far less likely to get dick cheese than monkey dick guys.
So are guys who shower properly. (I realize that excludes Russell.)

Rusty's attentions might be enough for whores to exit the industry.
They might exit the hard way. At least one whore who let Russell fuck her became suicidal.
 
He's American, it's standard practice here because the guy who invented cornflakes thought it was a good idea.

That's the cover story. The real reason is that after WWII, when it really became common practice, it was to make it harder to tell who the Jews were among the general population, and this was a time when a larger number of medical practitioners in the US were indeed Jewish.

As far as any benefit it has, all the original reasons they made up for why it was a good idea were all wrong. After decades of studying the issue the only benefit that has been discovered is that there is a slightly reduced risk of transmitting HIV to a female sex partner of around 13% and the reasoning behind it is rather complex, involving the immune system, macrophages, etc... so I won't bore you with the immunomolecular details.

So, this generally means that there was no benefit to circumcision until the late 1970's early 1980's when HIV was introduced by the CIA to try and kill off the queers, drug users, whores, and niggers, introduced to the wider world by a Northern European laborer that brought it from Kinshasa in the Congo because of his love of prostitutes, with the prostitutes likely being infected by raw dogging Congolese men that ate bush meat (or fucked animals that were members of the great ape family). Also, that means it provides no benefit to anyone that isn't fucking guys that raw dog queers, drug users, whores, and niggers. have HIV.

So, in a rather roundabout way, the benefit of circumcision and the introduction of HIV as a result of fucking whores, are tied in a very tenuous way to The Story of Rusty "The Whoremaster" Greer.
 
Last edited:
No one has ever lost sensation from the head of their dick from having nasty foreskin pruned. The ligation method used cannot even have accidents that damage the dick in a medical circumcision.

That isn't true:


Rates of potentially serious male circumcision adverse events ranged from 0.76 per million male circumcision (95% CI: 0.10 – 5.43) for stricture of male genital organs to 703.23 per million male circumcision (95% CI: 659.22 – 750.18) for repair of incomplete circumcision.

So, while less than 1 in a million, it does happen.

Literally no medical procedure is without serious risk, regardless of how remote it is.
 
Back