2025 Israel vs Iran War

Nukes have a very specific radioactive signature that you can detect in decay products. You can differ them even from reactor products that escaped into air.
There's no deniability here.
Even if there weren't, there'd still be no point in trying for deniability. Only the US is capable of it. If those bunkers go boom, everyone knows who did it.
The increased risk is that the neutron+xray wave also sets off the underground uranium storages and then you have a big big fuckup on your hands. Shitty fizzled material that is mixed with dust and is escaping to the atmosphere in an area that is too radiocontaminated to seal.
In other words, the mission is to ruin their nuclear program, not create another Chernobyl.
Send all the pajeets there. Can't get anymore dirty.
Sure, let's take the race that's multiplying like bunny rabbits and give them Feral Ghoul powers.
 
Even if you hate Israel, we've reached a point where if you're actively cheering Iran like they're gonna make some big comeback, you've gotta be feeling a little embarrassed.
I've met Israel Jews. I've met Iranians. They're both nice. Whatever.

Israel is weird and paranoid and gay.
Iran is weird and paranoid and gay.

Israel wants to spend money to influence my politicians and keep outsiders away from their crazy religion.
Iran wants to nuke my country and forcibly convert everyone to some bumfuck sandnigger bullshit.

You have to choose, sorry. Saying there is no choice is "nothing ever happens" faggotry. The choice is pretty obvious. Fuck Iran.

Maybe they'll be cooler once their Cold War fossils disappear. We're working on getting rid of ours.
 
In other words, the mission is to ruin their nuclear program, not create another Chernobyl.
Just eliminating competition in other words. They will get a nuke one way or another and then it will be 10 years of peace.
NK is not even mentioned in the news nowdays.
But oil rich nuclear country is basically immune to sanctions and interventions.
Iran wants to nuke my country and forcibly convert everyone to some bumfuck sandnigger bullshit.
Which country is that?
 
Caesar won, had Vercingetorix strangled to death and of course WROTE THE FUCKING HISTORY OF THE GALLIC WAR.
You picked an example where the victor literally wrote history.
May God have mercy on your soul.
Check out what French and German historians have to say about Vercingetorix, Arminius etc. In every western country really. The victor wrote the history only if the only history you've ever read is Commentarii de Bello Gallico. Historiography for a long time now has not been rah rah Caesar civilized the smelly Gauls. Hell back in the 1850s people were writing their own commentaries pointing out Caesar did it to get himself battle-hardened legions and lots of loot so he could take on Pompey in the inevitable contest between them for mastery of the republic
 
Screenshot 2025-06-18 190219.webp
Tweet / Archive

Screenshot 2025-06-18 190242.webp
Tweet / Archive


It seems like Trump is on board with a strike. Now the discussion is about whether a decisive blow can be dealt, without the US being dragged into a wider conflict.
 
Just eliminating competition in other words.
A foreign country that vows to kill you over and over again seeking nukes isn't just friendly competition.
They will get a nuke one way or another
Not if the West actually makes Iran put their money where their mouth is
and then it will be 10 years of peace.
Until the Ayatollah decides it's time for the world to be human sacrifice to Allah.
NK is not even mentioned in the news nowdays.
But oil rich nuclear country is basically immune to sanctions and interventions.

Which country is that?
North Korea is China's pitbull on a chain. Iran doesn't have that relationship with anyone else.
 
What Chima does internally to its own population doesn't matter. What matters is whether you can trade goods with them and not have some retard trying to strong arm you into doing what he wants.
It fucked with a lot of businesses.
Look man all I'm saying is that 90% of nation builders give up before it works.
Temujins approach would work but we don’t have the stomach for it.
 
The Russians themselves don't even know what they have or where.
The whole concept of a "dirty" nuclear bomb never made sense to me. Nuclear material is traceable with sniffers, geiger counters etc. and as soon as radiation is involved in an attack, every govt. intelligence agency will be looking for your ass, possibly more than if you used a 'normal' bomb. Those kinda of nuke devices don't effect that many people anyway due to scatter. You can get more milage by mass shootings or conventional ballistics.

I suspect most of the uranium and nuclear material was sold back to nuclear power powers and people like Iran who wouldn't ask too many questions where if came from for serious cash. If I am random insurgent group, Id much rather sell my stolen nuclear material for dollars to buy conventional weapons and fund my cause rather than build a dirty bomb. Insurgents with technicals for an army and using guns from WWII are not going to have the facilities or people necessary to successfully pull one off. It makes for a great TV plot because "muh radiation" but I always thought dirty bomb fears were overrated.

Now, if you had the ability to combine it with an implosion device aka... Nagasaki on the ground, thats when they become a real threat.
 

SEMAFOR: There are plenty of signs that Trump is listening to GOP hawks more than one might assume for someone who selected JD Vance as his vice president.​

SEMAFOR: Trump “carries great respect” for the likes of older-lines Republican pundits like Levin and Fox News’ Sean Hannity, “perhaps more so” than more non-interventionist types like Charlie Kirk and his vice president, said a person close to the administration.​

SEMAFOR: “If he wants, he can order strikes on Fordow, be sure that he’s caved it all in — and at the end of it say: ‘I consider the matter closed, we’re done with offensive operations in Iran,’” a Republican lawmaker added.​


Regarding the threats directed at the Iraqi government and the current situation of the country: It is known that targeting any headquarters of the resistance or its leaders will not go unanswered. The people of resistance will strike back with the right of response. We will not allow the enemy to make a move without a harsh reaction from us. We warn them not to commit this foolishness again, so that we are not forced to respond in a way that breaks their arrogance and makes them an example to others. - Abu Ali Al Askary Kata'ib Hezbollah
 
A reasonable stance, if true. Strike hard, strike fast, and get this shit over with.
People are bored of hearing about it.
I think most people can get behind a couple of MOPs delivered by a B2 to Iran's nuclear facilities. That's where the support ends though, boots on the ground would be ridiculously unpopular, plus very retarded.
 
View attachment 7524515
Tweet / Archive

View attachment 7524517
Tweet / Archive


It seems like Trump is on board with a strike. Now the discussion is about whether a decisive blow can be dealt, without the US being dragged into a wider conflict.
Trump is onboard with a strike if the Iranians don't bend the fucking knee. He told them 60 days, they strung him along, that pissed him off so ~50 days in he started arranging things on his end for Israel to go nuts on them. Day 61 and they did. He will not drop a single bomb if Iran does what he says. He will if they don't. It's really that simple and consistent with him. He says he wants a deal and makes threats about what will happen if the other side doesn't start dealing, they do and the threats are dropped like a nigger drops a bindle of heroin-fentanyl when he sees the police heading his way. They don't start dealing and the threats become real. If they then start dealing the threats become not real again. idk why everyone hasn't figured this out about Trump it's litrully the only way he operates
 
Back