US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Something I've noticed about people is they doom and gloom when Trump does one thing they don't like or fumbles something they throw in the towel completely while ignoring all the monumental achievements he's doing. Criticism is completely fine but Jesus have a fucking backbone.

>USAID was raped.
>Illegals being deported (imo anything above the number 0 is net good)
>Rioters getting their heads dented by the military
>Faggots and troons diving from buildings to cope
You win some and you loose some but when you win you win.
Defeatist outlooks on life is something nihilists have and nihilists belong in unmarked graves.
 
Exclusive: Democrats want new leaders, focus on pocketbook issues, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
Reuters (Ghost Archive)
By James Oliphant and Jason Lange
20 Jun 2025 03:01:01 GMT
WASHINGTON, June 19 (Reuters) - Democrats want new leaders for their party, which many feel isn't focusing enough on economic issues and is over-emphasizing issues like transgender rights and electric vehicles, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found.

The poll identified a deep disconnect between what Democrats say their priorities are and the issues they believe party leaders care about most ahead of next year's midterm elections, when they hope to crack Republican control of Congress. They see their elected officials as not focused on helping families make ends meet and reducing corporate influence.

Democrat Kamala Harris’ November loss to Republican Donald Trump has left the party rudderless and sparked a round of soul-searching about the path forward. The poll shows that party leaders have work to do in recruiting candidates for Congress in 2026 -- and for the White House in 2028.

Some 62% of self-identified Democrats in the poll agreed with a statement that "the leadership of the Democratic Party should be replaced with new people." Only 24% disagreed and the rest said they weren't sure or didn't answer.

1750388628830.webp

Just 30% of Republicans polled said they thought their party leadership should be replaced.

Democrats' dissatisfaction is also playing out in leadership changes, including this week's resignation of Randi Weingarten, the influential president of the American Federation of Teachers, from the Democratic National Committee -- which followed the ouster of progressive activist David Hogg.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll surveyed 4,258 people nationwide and online June 11 through 16, including 1,293 Democrats. It had a margin of error of about 3 percentage points for Democrats. It found that Democrats want the party to focus on their day-to-day needs and want wealthier Americans to pay more in taxes.

California Governor Gavin Newsom, who is viewed as a potential Democratic presidential candidate in 2028, agrees.

"People don't trust us, they don't think we have their backs on issues that are core to them, which are these kitchen table issues," Newsom said on his podcast in April.

DEMOCRATS 'IMPATIENT'​

Democratic strategists who reviewed the poll’s findings said they send a clear message.

"Voters are very impatient right now," said Mark Riddle, who heads Future Majority, a Democratic research firm. "They want elected officials at all levels to address the cost of living, kitchen-table issues and affordability."

The poll found a gap between what voters say they care about and what they think the party’s leaders prioritize. It was particularly wide on the issue of reducing corporate spending in political campaigns, where 73% of Democrats said they viewed putting limits on contributions to political groups like Super PACs a priority, but only 58% believed party leaders prioritize that.

That issue matters to Sam Boland, 29, a Democrat in Minneapolis, who views Super PAC money as a way to “legally bribe” candidates.

“Politicians want to keep their jobs and are afraid of the impact that publicly funded elections might have,” Boland said.

Along that line, 86% of Democrats said changing the federal tax code so wealthy Americans and large corporations pay more in taxes should be a priority, more than the 72% of those surveyed think party leaders make it a top concern.

The Republican-controlled Congress is currently pushing forward with Trump's sweeping tax-cut bill that would provide greater benefits to the wealthy than working-class Americans.

Anthony Rentsch, 29, of Baltimore, said he believes Democratic leaders are afraid to embrace more progressive policies such as higher taxes on the wealthy.

“A lot of Trump’s success has been with populist messages, and I think there's similar populist message Democrats can have,” Rentsch said.

Democrats' own priorities appeared more in line with party leaders on abortion rights - which 77% cited as a priority.

NEW BLOOD​

Dissatisfaction over the party's priorities on several economic policies was stronger among younger Democrats like Boland and Rentsch.

For example, only 55% of Democrats aged 18-39 thought the party prioritized paid family leave that would allow workers to care for sick family members and bond with a new baby, but 73% said it was a priority for them. Among older Democrats, the same share - 68% - that said the issue was a priority for them said it was a priority for party leaders.

Rentsch said that criticizing Trump over his conduct won’t be enough to win over skeptical voters.

“That can’t be it,” Rentsch said. “It has to be owning those issues that have an impact on their economic well-being and their physical and mental well-being.”

Democratic respondents said the party should be doing more to promote affordable childcare, reduce the price of prescription drugs, make health insurance more readily available and support mass transit. They view party leaders as less passionate about those issues than they are, the poll found.

1750388705868.webp

Even so, some Democrats argue the party also needs to stand toe-to-toe with Trump. “They gotta get mean,” said Dave Silvester, 37, of Phoenix.

Other Democrats said the party sometimes over-emphasizes issues that they view as less critical such as transgender rights. Just 17% of Democrats said allowing transgender people to compete in women and girls’ sports should be a priority, but 28% of Democrats think party leaders see it as such.

Benjamin Villagomez, 33, of Austin, Texas said that while trans rights are important, the issue too easily lends itself to Republican attacks.

“There are more important things to be moving the needle on,” said Villagomez, who is trans. “There are more pressing issues, things that actually matter to people’s livelihoods.”

Democratic strategists say that if Trump’s trade and tax policies lead to higher prices and an increased budget deficit, the party needs to be ready to take full advantage in next year’s elections, which will decide control of Congress.

“This recent polling data indicates Democrats have room for improvement on criticizing Trump on the economy and making it clear to voters that Democrats are the ones standing up for working people,” said Ben Tulchin, who served as U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders’ pollster for his two presidential campaigns.

The party needs to get beyond portraying itself “as the lesser of two evils," Boland, the Minneapolis Democrat, said.

“It needs to transform itself into a party that everyday people can get excited about,” he said. “That requires a changing of the guard.”

Reporting by James Oliphant and Jason Lange; Editing by Scott Malone and Deepa Babington
 
Trump Allowed to Keep Using National Guard in LA for Now
Bloomberg (archive.ph)
By Madlin Mekelburg
2025-06-20 03:09:35GMT
President Donald Trump can continue to use National Guard troops to respond to protests in Los Angeles as a legal challenge over his use of the military proceeds, a federal appeals court ruled.

In a win for the White House, a three-judge panel in San Francisco on Thursday said the Trump administration can keep using California National Guard troops to respond to the protests. In effect, it doesn’t change the situation on the ground in Los Angeles, where the federal government has been deploying the military for more than a week.

Thursday’s decision isn’t the final ruling on the matter and is likely to be immediately challenged. California could appeal the ruling to the US Supreme Court, or a bigger panel in the same appeals court. The lower court that had ordered the federal government to return control of the troops to the state will also hold a hearing on Friday.

California and the Trump administration have been sparring over the federal government’s response to the protests, including the deployment of thousands of the state’s National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines.

California and its Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, have blasted Trump’s deployment as a “power grab” and an unnecessary intrusion on the work of local officials to police the protests. Lawyers for the state also have said it’s “terrifying” that Justice Department lawyers said the presidents actions can’t be second-guessed by the courts, and argue that the deployment sets a dangerous precedent.

A spokesperson for Governor Newsom and the White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Trump administration has maintained that the president has the power to unilaterally federalize National Guard troops when he determines there is a “rebellion” or “invasion” that necessitates military intervention. And presidents are permitted to call up the state troops when “regular forces” are unable to enforce federal law.

The appeals court judges said Trump likely acted lawfully when he federalized the National Guard, but they objected to arguments raised by Justice Department lawyers that his decision cannot be reviewed by the courts.

“We conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority,” the appeals court said in a unanimous ruling late Thursday.

The judges also stressed that the decision is limited to whether Trump was allowed to call for the deployment, but does not address “the nature of the activities in which the federalized National Guard may engage.”

The appeals court panel, which heard arguments Tuesday by lawyers from both the Justice Department and California, is comprised of two judges appointed by Trump and one by former President Joe Biden. The court stepped in last week at the administration’s request to pauses US District Judge Charles Breyer’s order declaring that Trump’s deployment without California’s consent was “illegal.”

Trump issued a proclamation authorizing their deployment on June 7 and said protests in the city against his deportation initiative represent a form of “rebellion” against the authority of the federal government. In court filings, lawyers for the administration cited reports of violence and threats against federal property and officers conducting immigration enforcement.

Breyer said in his June 12 ruling he was troubled by the idea that a protest against the federal government on its own could “justify a finding of rebellion.”

The case is Newsom v. Trump, 25-3727, US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (San Francisco).

(Updates with comment requests from both sides in paragraph six.)
 
>Jew gets threadbanned
>Mormon proceeds to concede all ground to non-whites
>"Nothing to do" claims race traitor
Mormons really are just spiritual jews huh. They try to come off as le based trad conservatives but in reality they're one of the most reptilian and slimy people out there. You expect anything good to come out of the same people that gave us Mitt Romney? They do the same ruleslawyering bs the jews do in order to circumvent their own religious laws; at least libshits are honest about their degeneracy. Not to mention that they are one of the biggest servants of globohomo through their missionary and glowie shenanigans.
 
Last edited:
I believe this was in response to Zorhan, who is running for mayor. That pajeet is a retard. He plans on raising taxes in a city/state where taxes are already high.
How else does he expect to fund all the Soviet Style-free food state run supermarkets he plans to open? 🙄

...if he wins NYC mayor, expect an exodus of NYers fleeing to Florida/Carolinas/maybe Texas if NYers figure out that state is nice.
 
Sorry if this was posted already, but I think it's pretty cool: https://x.com/GovNuclear/status/1935009866822595086
1750393388080.webp


And Trump just guaranteed all of those will be reversed in four years when Dems inevitably take back power.
Fatpacks has spoken!

dear god there's already more than enough fucking NYers here in Florida. I guess I'll have to move to Nebraska to afford a home.
Nebraska is fucked, too. There really isn't anywhere to go anymore.
 
It begins...


Can somebody just glass the middle east already? I'm so fucking tired of hearing about sandniggers and their shithole countries. I've been blueballed on the US retvrning to woodland camo for 30 years! If I have to watch another decades worth of combat footage filled with aloha snackbaring I'm gonna fucking lose it.
Every country that doesn't consist of either Europeans or East Asians should be completely wiped off the face of the planet
How else does he expect to fund all the Soviet Style-free food state run supermarkets he plans to open? 🙄

...if he wins NYC mayor, expect an exodus of NYers fleeing to Florida/Carolinas/maybe Texas if NYers figure out that state is nice.
Then NYC will become an even more violent nonwhite shithole. NYC will probably become less than 15% White if he wins the mayor position
 
Back