Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 80 30.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 30 11.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 84 32.3%

  • Total voters
    260
I would think all Aaron's lawyer would have to do to refute that is play the hot tub swinger stream (and maybe the clip of shirtless Nick licking Aaron's face) as evidence that the relationship was public the whole time.
He can also play the clips of Nick talking about how he wanted people to know he was doing degenerate shit and left a breadcrumb trail for that purpose. Nick has always gotten off on people knowing he is a disgusting fag.
 
Aaron's lawyer and the prosecution have agreed on a plea deal. That's the $50 Kayla meme. The hearing on Wednesday is to rubber stamp that agreement.

HOWEVER, the judge can do whatever he/she wants within the parameters of the charge. The judge can ignore the plea deal altogether after listening to Kayla reading Nick's words and crying theater girl tears begging for a harsher sentence.

That's the minor drama at hand.
If the judge rejects the plea deal, would Aaron be allowed to change to "Not Guilty"?
Like, if I had a deal for a 50$ fine and not having to be registered as a sex offender, but the judge threw it out and he'd be sentencing me much harsher - fuck it, fight it - you have nothing to lose but your chains.
 
I still can't decide if Nick lacks the self awareness to see that literally everyone knew he was in a polycule, or if he's just lying
Nah man! Nobody knew! Not the nanny who quit in disgust, not the rando church people who told the pastor, not the fans who joked about Kayla getting pumped full of BBC, not the professionals who reported him.

It was ALL AARON!!
 
Calling him a woman is actually offensive to women at this point. He's a whimpering faggot. Atleast normal women clean their homes and take care of their children. Makes Kayla a faggot too.

I am keen on manlit as that is what he called Ron Toye who is indeed a manlit.. 6 years later we see Baldo with worse behaviour... So manlit delBlado or Baldingmanlit or Mandy tricks a manlit.. Man he is not lit. But sure has a tiny manlit unit and person.. Manlit is his spirit animal? As a magnetic sticker to put on the back of his car? When he goes to some convention. And a copy of that book Ron sent him :)
 
If the judge rejects the plea deal, would Aaron be allowed to change to "Not Guilty"?
Like, if I had a deal for a 50$ fine and not having to be registered as a sex offender, but the judge threw it out and he'd be sentencing me much harsher - fuck it, fight it - you have nothing to lose but your chains.
If he wasn't a retard, yes. He is, though, and did a victory lap on stream outlining exactly what he did after the plea deal. So, no, he is fucked and he has to take what the court gives, as there is no chance he gets a not guilty as trial, because he couldn't keep his mouth shut.
 
The only part about Aaron maybe getting fucked more that displeases me is that it would make Nick slightly less miserable for a minute or two.
Now if Aaron wins, that'd make Nick even further miserable. I only see an upside to this scenario.
Nick will still be very miserable even if he "wins" though, he's a deranged loser who thinks his actions don't have consequences (or, shouldn't). And he will keep fucking up his life because of it.

(I know, you said "slightly less miserable", so I'm just agreeing basically. The spectacle that is his constant downfall will continue either way.)
 
Last edited:
Nick talks big until its time to actually do, and then he wimp out like the weak woman he is
His mouth is just about the "biggest" thing about him, which is ironic, given that he's a small man in every way that matters: he's small minded, small muscled, small of presence, he has a tiny, easily damaged ego to match his tragic penis that can satisfy neither man nor beast. He likes to think of himself as worldly, wise & influential when in reality his entire life experience is myopic, isolated to about four years of actual employment out of 40 living in Texas & bumfuck nowhere Minnesota - he's gone nowhere & done nothing of consequence.

He could be ten foot tall and STILL be the smallest man in a room full of legless wheelchair-bound midgets.
 
Aaron's lawyer and the prosecution have agreed on a plea deal. That's the $50 Kayla meme. The hearing on Wednesday is to rubber stamp that agreement.

HOWEVER, the judge can do whatever he/she wants within the parameters of the charge. The judge can ignore the plea deal altogether after listening to Kayla reading Nick's words and crying theater girl tears begging for a harsher sentence.

That's the minor drama at hand.
The nature of the Toe is to win - be it blindly and without deserve. The gods smile upon the Toe.
 
HOWEVER, the judge can do whatever he/she wants within the parameters of the charge. The judge can ignore the plea deal altogether after listening to Kayla reading Nick's words and crying theater girl tears begging for a harsher sentence.

This may vary by jurisdiction, but in Minnesota the insane fantasy that a certain non-practicing former never-lawyer has been trying to sell to diddlerverse dunces about some judge's alleged ability to "throw out" the plea deal is not quite so simple, and instead Aaron does have some flexibility about how to deal with any unwelcome surprises that might arise on Wednesday:

Kangz.webp
State v. King, No. A14-0944 (Minn. App. January 26, 2015)

Some amendments have altered the rule citation mentioned there, but the substance is essentially the same to this very day:

MRCP15.04(3)(2).webp
Minn. R. Crim. P. 15.04, subd. 3(2)

In this particular case, we unfortunately don't have the plea hearing's transcript that was far too Nickless to pay ~$180 for unlike the sentencing hearing, so there's no way to know what was said about what parts were set in stone or were postponed, but just reading the tea leaves here without a transcript, it's fair to assume that the plea petition was critically in the nature of an "agreement" rather than a mere "recommendation," and it's only slightly less fair to assume that the wait for a pre-sentence investigation implies that there was a postponement of full acceptance of the plea deal until sentencing and it therefore can be easily withdrawn:

Plea.webp
[L]

Dezeler1.webp
State v. DeZeler, 422 N.W.2d 32, 36 (Minn. App. 1988 ), affirmed on other grounds, 427 N.W.2d 231 (Minn. 1988 )

As for the odds of whether such a surprise plea withdrawal could end up becoming necessary, well, just take a gander at this judge and make your own independent judgments:

Judge.webp
[L]

TLDR: Even if Kayla's ample community theater experience produces enough crocodile tears to fool the judge into throwing the plea agreement out the window and railroading Aaron into an executed jail sentence that nobody on either side of the versus saw coming, that would still leave Aaron the "out" of withdrawing the plea as a matter of right, excluding from a jury's view his testimonial admissions of guilt that he spewed out in direct reliance on the plea agreement, and shoving Geanu's unwillingness to appear straight down the state's fucking throat to get the dismissal, directed verdict, or outright acquittal that were always in the cards. It kinda sucks that direct reliance on the plea agreement induced his spewing out all sorts of non-testimonal admissions of guilt in public that would be tougher (if not impossible) to exclude from a jury's view, and that's on him (and/or on his lawyer for not advising him to shut the fucking fuck up until after the proverbial fat lady sings), but if the judge is truly going to railroad him on post-plea sentencing, then there would be nothing to lose in shoving it all through a trial that'd probably end up with a roughly similar sentence anyway. Far more importantly, such a post-plea-withdrawal trial would be worth it for the content.
 
Last edited:
As for the odds of whether such a surprise plea withdrawal could end up becoming necessary, well, just take a gander at this judge and make your own independent judgments:

Judge.webp
[L]
Let's just all take a moment to appreciate that Nick is having to appeal to a fat woman in government to hurt his enemies.
 
Let's just all take a moment to appreciate that Nick is having to appeal to a fat woman in government to hurt his enemies.
Maybe threatening to rape her will help.

Imagine being a former lawyer and rape threats are all you have in your arsenal.
 
Aaron's lawyer and the prosecution have agreed on a plea deal. That's the $50 Kayla meme. The hearing on Wednesday is to rubber stamp that agreement.

HOWEVER, the judge can do whatever he/she wants within the parameters of the charge. The judge can ignore the plea deal altogether after listening to Kayla reading Nick's words and crying theater girl tears begging for a harsher sentence.

That's the minor drama at hand.
Are you telling me that the judge has to look at this smug face when deciding what kind of punishment she will give to Aaron?
smug-rekieta.webp
 
I am very curious about that ethics charge. I wonder if anyone knows what it's about. 🤔 I'm sure he hasn't said what it's about, publicly, because he seems to know it's valid.
One of them is for falsely representing himself as being a lawyer, offering legal advice when suspended, falsely advertising a defunct law firm, etc. Another, earlier ethics complaint for a different ethical violation is also ongoing.
 
Your average revenge fueled man with a lack of self control goes for a walk with a gun. Not Rekieta though. He is going to watch his enemy, noting possible petty legal violations and then force his fucked up wife to tell a court how important this enemy is and how much he hurt her. He even seethes like a cuck.

Yeah, if I'm Aaron Imholte's lawyer, I'm absolutely attempting to have that clip shown in court.
 
Back