UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

Morethanabitfoolish · Jun 22, 2025

Since no doubt down the line people will claim they weren't warned here's an archive of one of the stories about Wes' remarks.

https://archive.ph/YIIHB

The health secretary warned there was “no budget” for the introduction of assisted dying laws and suggested MPs had made the “wrong” choice last week.
In a statement issued to his constituents on Facebook after the historic Commons vote on Friday, Wes Streeting said: “Setting up this service will take time and money that is in short supply.”
The process could divert resources from the NHS and other public services, he wrote. “Politics is about prioritising. It is a daily series of choices and trade-offs. I fear we’ve made the wrong one.”
Under the terms of the bill, the NHS will be expected to carry out assisted dying procedures. Analysis shows each death will cost the taxpayer about £15,000. The implementation of assisted dying could cost the health service almost £425 million in the first ten years.

Streeting voted for a change in the law in 2015, later deciding against it because of concerns about the state of palliative care in the UK. He is the first cabinet minister to publicly raise his concerns about the Labour MP Kim Leadbeater’s bill since it narrowly passed its third reading last week with a majority of 23. Streeting was one of six cabinet ministers to vote against it.
Sir Keir Starmer voted in favour of the bill, which will now begin its passage through the House of Lords. The first reading is expected as soon as Tuesday.

Streeting, who is a Christian, was rebuked by the prime minister after earlier interventions opposing the bill. Cabinet ministers had been ordered to remain neutral on the legislation’s passage and the issue itself.
The health secretary is understood to be deeply concerned about the impact assisted dying would have on an overstretched NHS. He is also worried about the risks that he believes will come with it.
Writing on Facebook, Streeting, 42, said: “I can’t get past the concerns expressed by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Royal College of Physicians, the Association for Palliative Medicine and a wide range of charities representing underprivileged groups in our society about the risks that come with this bill.
“Gordon Brown wrote this week that ‘there is no effective freedom to choose if the alternative option, the freedom to draw on high-quality end-of-life care, is not available. Neither is there real freedom to choose if, as many fear, patients will feel under pressure to relieve their relatives of the burden of caring for them, a form of coercion that prioritising good end-of-life care would diminish.’ He is right.
“The truth is that creating those conditions will take time and money. Even with the savings that might come from assisted dying if people take up the service — and it feels uncomfortable talking about savings in this context, to be honest — setting up this service will also take time and money that is in short supply. There isn’t a budget for this.”

Several cabinet ministers are thought to feel the same. One said: “The government is under so much pressure … everyone knows money is so scarce and we have to prioritise the things we do with it. Assisted dying is going to eat up a lot of our bandwidth and will undoubtedly mean we won’t be able to do some of the things we wanted to, given the massive competition for resources.”

Another cabinet minister said: “Rachel Reeves voted for assisted dying. I hope that means she has found the money for it.”

A number of those who opposed the bill have raised concerns that assisted dying could take resources away from patients. Dame Siobhain McDonagh, a Labour MP who voted against the legislation, said it could become “the Trojan horse that breaks the NHS”.
The impact assessment of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill estimates up to 28,317 people will die by state-assisted suicide within the first ten years of its introduction. It is forecast to rise from 647 cases in the first year to more than 4,500 by 2038, and could mean costs of £425 million for the NHS over the decade. That sum includes educating all health and social care staff, training doctors and nurses involved in the assisted dying service, setting up a regulator and the costs of the lethal drugs themselves.

Overall, the assessment suggests the government could save more than £640 million because of those who would have been in hospital or in care dying earlier. Some of these savings could be made by the NHS.
Dame Esther Rantzen, who turns 85 today, appealed to peers not to block the bill. The veteran broadcaster, who joined the Swiss assisted dying clinic Dignitas after being diagnosed with terminal lung cancer in 2023, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme yesterday that the job of the House of Lords “is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose”.
The bill’s opponents have already pledged to use “every means possible” to stop it becoming law, pointing to a Lords convention which allows peers to table as many amendments as they want to a piece of legislation at its report stage — all of which would potentially have to be voted on.

Lord Falconer of Thoroton, the former lord chancellor who supports a change in the law and is expected to have a leading role in taking the bill through the Lords, suggested that it was unlikely the bill would be blocked.
Writing for The Sunday Times, he said: “The Lords has always debated this issue with profound depth and understanding. The reputation of the Lords depends on the quality of its scrutiny. The chamber as a whole will not want and will not allow the debates on this bill to be derailed by filibustering wreckers.
“The Commons, after a prolonged period of debate and scrutiny, has decided the law must change. The Lords will scrutinise and improve but it will respect and give effect to that decision.”

And as the Time was also good enough to list who voted in another article I'll link that but the table's too big to post.

https://archive.ph/CWi2U

BongoMongo · Jun 22, 2025

Streeting is a practicing faggot isn't he? If he takes it up the shit pipe or does a spot of uphill gardening then he is not a Christian.

You cannot be a faggot and a Christian. Not fucking possible.

Zoot · Jun 22, 2025

Please don't let Rupert be a warhawk too

So far so good

teriyakiburns · Jun 22, 2025

Zoot said:
We need an Adolf.

We don't need a gas-addled vegetarian anti-smoker driven by an overwhelming desire to rebuild a lost empire.

Zoot · Jun 22, 2025

teriyakiburns said:
We don't need a gas-addled vegetarian anti-smoker driven by an overwhelming desire to rebuild a lost empire.

yeah, we;re doing just fine without him

teriyakiburns · Jun 22, 2025

Zoot said:
yeah, we;re doing just fine without him
View attachment 7540229

I don't understand why people persist with this ahistorical bullshit. The man who had an entire african SS legion, who wanted to depopulate Germany entirely and turn it into a nature park, who admired Islam and wished Charles Martel had lost at Tours, and who was more than happy to have doctors from Hirshfield's "institute for sexology" continue to work for the German state after it was closed down, this is the man you prop up as some saviour of the west. Hitler winning wouldn't have improved anything we're experiencing,and would arguably have made things worse, by giving Germany control over Britain's Imperial possessions and making us subservient to a foreign power, run by a man from a culture known for several centuries for its perverse sexual desires and an obsession with shit.

Tragon Dirtle · Jun 22, 2025

Illustrator Aljoscha Quooss has made several tiktoks alleging that Matt Lucas sexually assaulted him, and that Matt Lucas and David Walliams have been working together to sexually assault many young men in the creative industries over the last 20 years.

https://www.tiktok.com/@aljoscha.quooss/video/7518274682664029462

It's being discussed on Fauxmoi, and in the comments they're mentioning a British poet Kiran Millwood Hargrave, who has
apparently sharing on social media for several years now that David Walliams is actively kept away from young women staff in the British publishing industry, but I can't find anything about that anywhere else yet.

This description is almost identical to the one in Baby Reindeer, it makes me wonder if the producer in that was supposed to be Lucas or Walliams.

Kofi Drinka · Jun 22, 2025

BongoMongo said:
Does anyone know precisely why they want to map the genome of people. If anyone believes it's to stop bad health then they're weapons grade retarded.

DNA database for the police. They already use the public ones and pretend they don't.

Money. Selling the DNA of every person born is a good way to make some cash.

Zoot said:
Farage is officially a race traitor. No mention of the future of Great Britain or our interest.

View attachment 7539867
Link Archive

Tice falling in line with the jews
View attachment 7539934
Link Archive

Haven't Farage's past groups all been funded by and had internal Israeli handlers? The Friends of Israel groups are influencing British politics from behind the scenes and no one investigates them. They leech onto every party and twist it to be pro-Israel. Bringing them to light would be helpful to identifying who is a bought asset.

teriyakiburns said:
Hitler winning wouldn't have improved anything we're experiencing,and would arguably have made things worse, by giving Germany control over Britain's Imperial possessions and making us subservient to a foreign power, run by a man from a culture known for several centuries for its perverse sexual desires and an obsession with shit.

You're describing Starmer. He has more loyalty to Judaism than Britain. Perverse sexual desires and an obsession with shit is as Jewish as they come.

anklyscr · Jun 22, 2025

Bog-standard Poster said:
Because sluts like this have thin skin, they want you to provide your driving license and passport so that your hurty words can be punished

Fuck off retard.
The reason why these “people” are so unhappy with these tattle sites and other social media is because the plebs can finally talk back to them. It used be a one way system they told the plebs what to think and how to think about them. They managed their entire public persona. It was a perfect facade hiding all the skeletons behind.

Now with twitter et al the public can leak anything and post their opinions anonymously and the “celebs” don’t like it.

Whoopsie Daisy · Jun 22, 2025

anklyscr said:
Fuck off retard.
The reason why these “people” are so unhappy with these tattle sites and other social media is because the plebs can finally talk back to them. It used be a one way system they told the plebs what to think and how to think about them. They managed their entire public persona. It was a perfect facade hiding all the skeletons behind.

Now with twitter et al the public can leak anything and post their opinions anonymously and the “celebs” don’t like it.

Are you calling me a retard, or the celebrities a retard?

Zoot · Jun 22, 2025

teriyakiburns said:
arguably have made things worse,

Hitler was right. Those that fought him were wrong and brought on the genocide of the European peoples through Jewish control.

Otterly · Jun 22, 2025

Made In Wales said:
In the same way, yes Lucy did commit a crime

She may have committed a crime, bit she did nothing wrong. When you can do something that’s not wrong, and it’s a crime, then you’ve got a problem with your laws. What she said was something like ‘they could burn them (asylum hotels) down for all i care.’
Arson is a crime. Saying you don’t particularly care if every asylum hotel gets lit up is an opinion. There is no way with her reach that anyone would read what she said and go burn down an asylum hotel.
They are not equivalent. I could, for example, say that it’d be a kind of cosmic justice if after being released she became guy Fawkes 2.0, because the only thing worth preserving in Westminster is the architecture. That’s hyperbole, and a sort of joke. If I’m caught in an under cellar with a truckload of c4, I’m in commission of a crime.
The current government is letting bad people DO bad things and locking up people for SAYING angry opinions. We have a problem.

BongoMongo said:
Does anyone know precisely why they want to map the genome of people. If anyone believes it's to stop bad health then they're weapons grade retarded.

How tin foil hat d’you want it?
From least to most;
Benefits health of nation (as if.)
Can be used to supplement police database
Can be sold to megacorps for megabucks
Can be part of the social credit/control grid
Can be used to create ethnically targeted weapons

teriyakiburns · Jun 22, 2025

Tragon Dirtle said:
Matt Lucas and David Walliams

Matt Lucas is weird looking, but I don't know whether or not I'd classify him as perverted just based on his looks (it's everything else he does that sets off the alarms). David Walliams I can absolutely believe is as rapey cunt. Just look at him:

He exudes a constant aura of smug rapery. You can tell he's constantly ogling small boys in his mind's eye just by the expression on his face.

Tom Nook's Gloryhole · Jun 22, 2025

Zoot said:
If Starmer gets involved in this Jews vs Iran shit, will that kill of the rest of labour dwindling voter base?

Might fuck reform as well as the Jew side will be the fake right positon and the Jews have probably already bribed the party anyway.

I don't give a shit about Iran but I'll be happy to take to the streets in protest over joining the war if it's the thing that kills off Starmer. Sure I'll be walking side by side with the cunts that I want ~~shot~~ deported, but it's a risk I'm willing to take.

Tragon Dirtle · Jun 22, 2025

teriyakiburns said:
Matt Lucas is weird looking, but I don't know whether or not I'd classify him as perverted just based on his looks (it's everything else he does that sets off the alarms). David Walliams I can absolutely believe is as rapey cunt. Just look at him:

View attachment 7540453

He exudes a constant aura of smug rapery. You can tell he's constantly ogling small boys in his mind's eye just by the expression on his face.

If you watch the video, Matt Lucas is the one that sexually assaulted him, not David.

Tom Nook's Gloryhole · Jun 22, 2025

I remember ages back, like 2004ish when a comedian made a joke about Matt Lucas not only being not the only gay in the village, but not the only gay in the duo. David Walliams was absolutely fucking furious at the time, but somehow hasn't ever been seen publicly with a woman.

Pretty sure that was a subtle way of exposing him that was shut down.

teriyakiburns · Jun 22, 2025

Tragon Dirtle said:
If you watch the video, Matt Lucas is the one that sexually assaulted him, not David.

I did. Wasn't my point.

Tragon Dirtle · Jun 22, 2025

Tom Nook's Gloryhole said:
I remember ages back, like 2004ish when a comedian made a joke about Matt Lucas not only being not the only gay in the village, but not the only gay in the duo. David Walliams was absolutely fucking furious at the time, but somehow hasn't ever been seen publicly with a woman.

Pretty sure that was a subtle way of exposing him that was shut down.

Walliams was married to and had kids with model Lara Stone for like 10 years. I also mentioned that he's been accused of inappropriateness towards young women - men just always focus on men preying on boys and conceptualising it as gay (only happening to boys) because they don't care about it happening to girls. It's like the priest scandals also involved many girl victims, but you never hear about it, because men don't care and want to make it a male on male homosexuals only problem.

teriyakiburns said:
I did. Wasn't my point.

Okay. People itt usually don't read beyond the headlines or what's actually being discussed, so I assumed you hadn't either.

Zoot · Jun 22, 2025

The protest party in Britain is completely captured by ZOG

Link Archive

>IMPLYING · Jun 22, 2025

Zoot said:
Hitler was right. Those that fought him were wrong and brought on the genocide of the European peoples through Jewish control.

Jews were a problem in Germany (and Russia, to a lesser extent) due to high number of them and their disproportionate presence relative to the native population in education, finance and press. The same thing happened (is currently happening) to America in some regard, but in the UK our Jews were relatively well turned out. Even the Rothschilds were remarkably loyal (funded Wellington, bought the Suez right out from under the French), but even back in the 1910s the influence/number of Jews entrenched within high and influential positions in the USA was known, even to the UK. The infamous "Balfour Declaration" was another cynical attempt to draw America into the first world war, because it had Zionists lean on American politicians to have them enter it because if the UK won, it meant we could give them the land they thought themselves entitled to — only for us to drag our feet and then ultimately decide to give it to the Arabs instead (very funny) until WW2 happened. (Look up "The White Paper" and conclusions drawn from the "Peel Commission")

I think the danger of idolising Hitler too much is you'll put what is less of a problem in the UK (Jews) over a more pressing one (Muslims). It's why you'll occasionally see the occasional "Muslims are based!" remark from some American wignat because they haven't experienced widespread problems as a result of their presence in America compared to the overt ones caused by Jews (AIPAC). Jewish dominance over American politics is scattered but after Israel was established the true Zionists mostly abided by their ideology, and went to Israel. It's why in 1956 America ultimately acted against Israel in the Suez Crisis, and it would take until the Yon Kippur war for Israel to look threatened enough for AIPAC to get millions of dollars (mostly from Jews, many of whom never even went to Israel) and thus actual sway over the American government. In the 80s Gerald Ford came very close to demoting Israel's importance until congress (which was now being leant on by AIPAC) advised him otherwise. So the only country has a Jewish problem in present is America (and it's mostly a problem embedded in the past 60 years), and because the West by and large is downwind from America (as loathe as some would admit), it makes them an indirect problem to us also — but all we need to do on our end is assert our own identity and not imitate the American right-wing socially, economically, or politically.

To make Jews a problem in the UK, you tend to have to make some contrivances and loose tethers of connection between groups, ideas and individuals in order for it to work, which isn't as convincing as pointing to the Muslim who is in a position of power and is pro-immigration. You can create a flow chart of how they became a problem: Immigrants act 1971 -> British Nationality Act 1981 -> Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2002 -> Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 -> Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009. The most recent 3 are the most damaging. 2002 is responsible for stateless peoples being allowed to stay here, and made it so that the secretary of state can only deprive someone of their British citizenship if they're a dual citizen, which is probably the most annoying obstacle for getting rid of anyone, especially if we can't determine where the person is a citizen of.

By giving too much credit to the Jews, you make them too powerful, and take much of the responsibility out of the hands of the traitors and selfish cunts who did all this to begin with. Labour not only traded rapes for votes, they did the same for a lot of young people's futures when they opened up the borders (and so did the Tories, when they kept their foot in place to keep it from closing).

P.S.
Hitler acknowledged his economical goals (conquering everything to the East) would only work with a British alliance as to protect their West flank, but he made no real attempt to attain said alliance or if he did, it was ultimately sabotaged by the retard Ribbentrop.
Furthermore, Hitler was a figure meant to address German problems via a uniquely German solution.
What you really need is a figure meant to address British problems via a uniquely British solution.

UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

Morethanabitfoolish

Bruh.

BongoMongo

Zoot

teriyakiburns

If a cow got the chance, he'd eat you!

Zoot

teriyakiburns

If a cow got the chance, he'd eat you!

Tragon Dirtle

Kofi Drinka

anklyscr

Seriously. Tits on a ghost

Whoopsie Daisy

Ask me about how teen boys deserve to be molested

Zoot

Otterly

Primark Primarch

teriyakiburns

If a cow got the chance, he'd eat you!

Tom Nook's Gloryhole

Tragon Dirtle

Tom Nook's Gloryhole

teriyakiburns

If a cow got the chance, he'd eat you!

Tragon Dirtle

Zoot

>IMPLYING