US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Answering hypotheticals is cucked because the questioner is trying to drag the conversation away from reality and into his make believe head canon which by definition isn't real. Reality gives us plenty to talk about. Only someone losing an argument would want to reframe the line of questioning away from what's real. It is rhetorical cuckery to be led astray from a winning position.
Well the first half I can’t deny and have to agree with
 
  • Like
Reactions: YarrBlueballs
Holy shit my guy. Did you ever play spies as a kid? Do you not know how military intelligence works?

You cannot just "extract" spies like that. This is an active and ever changing combat scenario. The scenario is hot. Your informants have to stay informing. You cannot just extract them whenever you want. You cannot just do a "tell all" whenever you want. Why? Because chances are the American military have informants in the same positions across the globe. When I reveal how I infiltrate one facility, I reveal how I infiltrated every single other similar facility to every other enemy. Like, holy fuck man. I am glad you are not running our military. Your bone headed decisions would get us blown up. Use your head for a god damned moment and THINK. Think, babydunk, THINK.
Show us "we know nothing, it's all carefully guarded secrets" is positive evidence to you that Iran was going to detonate a nuclear weapon in an offensive capacity
 
Answering hypotheticals is cucked because the questioner is trying to drag the conversation away from reality and into his make believe head canon which by definition isn't real. Reality gives us plenty to talk about. Only someone losing an argument would want to reframe the line of questioning away from what's real. It is rhetorical cuckery to be led astray from a winning position.
DAVID DAVID DAVID what if Anne Frank had the opportunity to kill Hitler, but the ONLY way for her to pull the trigger was for you to answer a short series of 3 hypotheticals?
 
I sincerely hope all the nothing-ever-happens posters are correct. I cannot begin to express how much I don't want us to go to war with Iran.

It's all so fucking tiresome.
I really want to look back and make fun of myself for overreacting about this. But war with Iran really seems inevitable. We'll just have to wait and see if the Ayatollah cucks out or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeWuzFinns
One is an actual ally as opposed to a parasite.

View attachment 7541013
You guys really need to drop it with the USS liberty shit, it comes across as desperate and hurts your cause so effectively it may as well be a mossad psyop.

The amount of skeevy lawyers, corrupt politicians, pozzed academics and so on who are members of the tribe and infest our institutions and culture is a good angle and one that genuinely gets me to raise my eyebrows even though i'm not convinced it's a grand conspiracy.

But a boat that got hit 50 fucking years ago in a friendly fire incident in the middle of a warzone at a time when naval hailing relied on HF and morse code is such a nothing burger if you know anything about naval combat.

hq720.webp

Friendly fire happens constantly, 30% of american deaths in the gulf war were friendly fire, we shot a UK plane down by accident as well as 2 of our own FA-18s, there was that incident where we bombed canadians in afghanistan, turkey shelled our troops in the early stages of the iraq invasion, and that's all on LAND. Listing naval friendly fire would take ages.

The liberty was operating in egyptian waters during a war where israel was fighting for their lives against 5 opponents, they had just hit an egyptian destroyer in the same area 2 days prior, and again naval communication largely came down to looking out the damn window and there were no IFFs back then. Not to suck israel off too hard but the liberty should not have been there unnannounced, by modern, or even 1990s standards of naval procedure the liberty would have never been operating in those waters because it was frankly dangerous to be there whether o not you think the war was justified.

TLDR If you want to bring young uns onto your jew seethe bandwagon focus on the snakes who infest our institutions because they can actually relate to that: Lawyers who defend savage animals, professors who teach marxism, directors who ruin movies, NGOs who bail rioters out, and bankers who fund wokeshit and so on. Seething about a research vessel from decades before any of them were born comes across as an old man wagging his cane at a cloud. It would be like somebody telling you in your youth not to like nintendo because the japanese attacked pearl harbor, you just wouldn't care.
 
what would boots on the ground accomplish that an air war couldn't?
"Why did they have to go into the city why can't they just fling enough rocks over the walls with the catapults and call it a day?"

...
If you want to bring young uns onto your jew seethe bandwagon focus on the
Get a load of Toucan Sam over here.
 
The US have already demonstrated that we are more than capable of smiting targets within Iran's boarder. If this does escalate, what would boots on the ground accomplish that an air war couldn't?
What does Iran have that could close the Strait that we can't counter is the real question. Is it something that magically makes the Strait closed that we can't do anything about? More taking us to small claims court? Ever since this started Iran has been abandoned by everyone that was, in theory, on their side, and have been flailing relatively ineffectively ever since, so why are people still assuming that there's some secret hyper-competent Iranian response coming?

Oh, they fired ballistic missiles at Tel Aviv? Great, what exactly has that accomplished for them? Has it stopped the Israelis from shitting on them? Has it moved Iran out of the status of The Raped? This time, the consequences will be different?
 
CNN hosts say things because it provokes people (not very many, but a few) to keep watching CNN hosts say things. Same goes for hosts on "The View".
Yeah those shows exist because of all the rent-free coverage in conservative networks using them for clickbait. I'm not saying they don't have their own fans who believe their garbage, but they would be hurt, greatly, if they just got properly ignored.
 
DAVID DAVID DAVID what if Anne Frank had the opportunity to kill Hitler, but the ONLY way for her to pull the trigger was for you to answer a short series of 3 hypotheticals?
Well, when you put it like that, I guess enlisting into the Marine Corps to get ready to deploy in Tehran is the only sensible option. I'm on my way to the recruiting office now, wish me luck bros
 
"Why did they have to go into the city why can't they just fling enough rocks over the walls with the catapults and call it a day?"
If your goal is to capture the city then sure, you need men on the ground. But if you just want to destabilize and crippled the enemy, bombs from above are more than capable.
 
Answering hypotheticals is cucked because the questioner is trying to drag the conversation away from reality and into his make believe head canon which by definition isn't real. Reality gives us plenty to talk about. Only someone losing an argument would want to reframe the line of questioning away from what's real. It is rhetorical cuckery to be led astray from a winning position.
Okay well I'll circle back around in a few months (or weeks at this rate) and ask you how you feel about boots on the ground when it's reality, I'm sure you'll have some new cope ready by then.
 
oy vey, the Groyper done unmasked me,

Fuck you retarded nigger, fuck every sandpit shithole. The only reason i want the muslim removed before the kikes is that kikes are just a satanic pedo cult instead of a satanic pedo DEATh cult like the towelheads.
"Oy vey my fellow Americas, I hate the Jew as much as you, but before we can fight the Jew, we must first die on the other side of the world in a war against a country that has no ability to threaten us."
 
Again
Holy shit my guy. Did you ever play spies as a kid? Do you not know how military intelligence works?

You cannot just "extract" spies like that. This is an active and ever changing combat scenario. The scenario is hot. Your informants have to stay informing. You cannot just extract them whenever you want. You cannot just do a "tell all" whenever you want. Why? Because chances are the American military have informants in the same positions across the globe. When I reveal how I infiltrate one facility, I reveal how I infiltrated every single other similar facility to every other enemy. Like, holy fuck man. I am glad you are not running our military. Your bone headed decisions would get us blown up. Use your head for a god damned moment and THINK. Think, babydunk, THINK.
So your suggestion is that we Trust The PlQn and take their words for it. Noice.

Retarded though.

Again, i do not mind if they classify some shit for operation security, but at this point, and with the interests involved in this there should be SOME transparency.Even if not now, at a later date....but sooner rather than late. i.e Not a decade later
 
I am pretty surprised by how many of my evangelical friends and family are only half-heartedly supporting America's attack on Iran, if not outright opposing it. One "we should support God's chosen people" Gen X'er has done a complete 180 in the past year and now thinks Israel is run by Satan and that modern Jews are demon-possessed. She fully believes America is run by Israel. She's begun to "notice" how often degenerate agendas are pushed by Jews in politics and academia and journalism. She's bought a copy of the Talmud to read and study. She got into a fight with her family over the strikes on Iran last night, the first time she's ever brought up these recent views to her family.

Another "God's chosen people" person said, "Well I think the Jews are close to God's heart but I don't think we should support everything they do and I think a lot of our pro-Israel politicians do more harm than good in the Middle East." This person is a Boomer.

Several of these folks told me they've been studying the effects of dispensationalism and the Scofield Bible in recent months/years and no longer support Israel or think Jews are super special. I don't think I have spoken to a single evangelical under the age of 40 who buys the "God's chosen people" line.

I'm not surprised Trump threw his weight behind Israel and bombed Iran. I am surprised at how many normie Christians aren't supporting it. Give me rainbows but I find it a little white pilling tbh.
 
Back