- Joined
- Sep 29, 2022
From mousing around on Google Earth it looks like they didn't do anything actually useful with it like "see if we can convert some of the old bus ROW back into usable streets" or "since we're reconfiguring all this stuff around the highways let's see if we can modernize the ramps"...Any of you ever hear of Ottawa's BRT to LRT conversion? Years ago they had one of the best transit systems in north america, super reliable and fast, a mix of separate roads for busses and bus lanes, it worked really well and a much larger than usual percentage of commuting was by bus. Then they spent most of the 2010s converting the separate roads to train lines and dug a subway under the core.
The result? Now it's very unreliable, slower, and transit ridership is way down even factoring in losses from the pandemic days. Even worse they somehow managed to buy trains that don't work when it's too cold or snowy (in Ottawa...).
And it cost like 3 billion dollars.
They do that all the time. Whenever someone tells them that they LIKE driving or living in a house, they get told that they've never lived in a city so they don't know what they're missing. Even telling them that you have lived in a dense city is not enough to derail them from their script, they'll just assert that whatever city you lived in wasn't a "real" city.
That's not an urbanist-exclusive tactic, a woman who doesn't buy into the latest feminist shit is told that she has been manipulated by the patriarchy (or some shit) while here the "patriarchy" is "Big Oil".
Most people have never had a friendly interaction with a cyclist:
"It's too loud" (then drive a car, which is quieter); "it's too dangerous for the user" (then drive a car and definitely don't use a bicycle).