Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 43 14.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.1%

  • Total voters
    293
It'd be extremely funny to me if Nick inviting Melton and his buddies to watch the testimony of his wife, turning it into content, leads to nothing worse happening to Aaron despite what Nick is fighting for.
I hope everything gets thrown out, then instead of saying "case dismissed" the judge declares "another win for the Toe" as he hits the gavel. That's the cue for the SWAT team to bust in and tackle Melton along with any of his fans that showed up to arrest on pedophilia charges.
 
And yet it moos.
Eppur si muggisce.
38 Days 18 hours until Aug 1st and Nick has zero hours of 80 hours of community service completed so far.
The way the judicial system works where he's at they'll count driving his KEEEEEEEEEEEEEDZ as community service or something equally silly.
Can we send Crackets and Our Wife to Iran?
The people of Iran don't deserve this cruel and unusual punishment. Better to be blasted with 30 thousand pound bunker busters than that.
 
View attachment 7544811View attachment 7544809View attachment 7544808

Melton asking if they can do a show from Nick's studio ("But you have to clean!")
View attachment 7544810

From Stallyn's comments
View attachment 7544813

Archive
View attachment 7544820
False. Hitler loved his dog.
So Nick "has a place" for Melton to stay. Imagine letting someone like that who makes certain "jokes" about children and then letting that same person around your own children? Truly diabolical. The evil ceiling Cat has full control it seems.
 
Prediction: the ethics complaint Nick seems worried about is from April over either his no show on her traffic case or him trying to represent her during the drug bust, or both, and there was actually a bad falling out between them.

What else could it be? He hasn't had any other clients and they really only give a shit about complaints from clients right?
Didn't he already disclose what the ethics investigation was about on his show? I recall that he said he was being investigated over his criminal charges and that the professional responsibility office asked him for his input on what his punishment should be, and that Nick's opinion (of course) was that there shouldn't be any.
 
:really:"Honey, I know we're...your presenting to the court that your violently traumatised by Aaron Imholte, so I've brought in his most dedicated detractor to our home so we can talk about him all night and day!"
"He made a song about two kids raping eachother? Comments about Aaron's daughter's privates? Defended AI CP in a lengthy diatribe, you say?"
"Water under the bridge, by the way he's hotbunking with the children, all good with you, right Kayla?":really:
 
:really:"Honey, I know we're...your presenting to the court that your violently traumatised by Aaron Imholte, so I've brought in his most dedicated detractor to our home so we can talk about him all night and day!"
"He made a song about two kids raping eachother? Comments about Aaron's daughter's privates? Defended AI CP in a lengthy diatribe, you say?"
"Water under the bridge, by the way he's hotbunking with the children, all good with you, right Kayla?":really:

I said in here months ago that Melton's price for stanning Nick might be photos of Nick's kids. I didn't let myself contemplate that Nick would let him be physically present around them.
 
I said in here months ago that Melton's price for stanning Nick might be photos of Nick's kids. I didn't let myself contemplate that Nick would let him be physically present around them.

Nick is absolutely the kind of retard that can't process Melton being a creep about Aaron's kids means Melton will, at some point, be a creep about his kids.

Like most people who tolerate Melton, the overriding hatred of Aaron makes them incapable of thinking it through.

I pray for the day Nick slights Melton or stops producing adequate content and the man stabs Nick in the back. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
 
I said in here months ago that Melton's price for stanning Nick might be photos of Nick's kids. I didn't let myself contemplate that Nick would let him be physically present around them.
That is the critical flaw in our thinking, we cannot expect Nick to be that retarded, only to be shown he is more retarded than we can ever imagine.
 
Screenshot 2025-06-23 at 11.13.44.webp Screenshot 2025-06-23 at 11.14.00.webp

I suppose some money laundering could be involved, but it's likely the truth is simpler: trashy idiots like gaudy shit; Nick thinks he is just like the Joker irl fr; he's never had to work hard in his life and lucked into money (both with his grandfather's wealth and with his brief streaming success) – so why not throw $59,000 at some painting that speaks to his low-rent heart?
Nice find! I had forgotten about this Locals post showing the Joker painting with a $59,000.00 price tag. Better to leave it archived, then: https://archive.md/hYgYU | https://rekietalaw.locals.com/upost/2714318/holy-shit-restrain-me
 
Yeah, the crackwhore talking about threesomes with his kids and sexting with him openly on Twitter was a massive upgrade...
Kayla is also a crack whore who lets Jamaican male strippers gangbang her. She's probably taken far more dick than April could ever hope to. I don't know about "talking about threesomes with his kids" but do you really think that the whore princess of the uterine sea herself, who lets her children live in squalor while being abused by their drunken manchild father is above anything? No, Kayla is an awful person and an even worse mother.

She's also completely off her fucking rocker bro and April isn't a pilled out zombie. April's a disgusting whore but she's a upgrade if only for the fact that she doesn't look like a cartoon which.
 
Update from the Balldo Bunker.

Screenshot 2025-06-23 at 12.54.40 PM.webp

 
Yeah, I've no idea. I'm pretty certain it wouldn't fly here in the UK because of the gendered nature of the insult. It'd be seen as a form of sexual harrassment. He might have been a defendant but he's still a male lawyer. I think you could easily make a good argument that he was seeking to use misogynistic insults to violate her dignity and attempt to create a hostile workplace environment for the judge.

If I'm a member of the Minnesota bar, I'm very definitely seeing such behaviour as conduct unbecoming a fellow lawyer -- as behaviour that brings the profession into disrepute. But I imagine there isn't a lot of precedent because most lawyers wouldn't be so retarded as to go around insulting judges.
In MN there are professional rules around harassment on certain discriminatory bases (Caveat: done in connection with professional duties), as well discriminatory actions, though there are 4 factors for determining whether it is deemed to reflect adversely on fitness as a lawyer - see (g) and (h) below. I've included all of section 8.4 (Misconduct) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for reference:

PROFESSIONAL RULES​

Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct

Rule 8.4​

It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:

(a)​

violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;

(b)​

commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;

(c)​

engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;

(d)​

engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;

(e)​

state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law;

(f)​

knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law;

(g)​

harass a person on the basis of sex, race, age, creed, religion, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, status with regard to public assistance, ethnicity, or marital status in connection with a lawyer's professional activities;

(h)​

commit a discriminatory act, prohibited by federal, state, or local statute or ordinance that reflects adversely on the lawyer's fitness as a lawyer. Whether a discriminatory act reflects adversely on a lawyer's fitness as a lawyer shall be determined after consideration of all the circumstances, including:

(1) the seriousness of the act;

(2) whether the lawyer knew that the act was prohibited by statute or ordinance;

(3) whether the act was part of a pattern of prohibited conduct; and

(4) whether the act was committed in connection with the lawyer's professional activities; or

(i)​

refuse to honor a final and binding fee arbitration award after agreeing to arbitrate a fee dispute.

Worthwhile to read the comments as well, which appear after the rules. It's a fairly high bar to be found in violation of g/h. Two excerpts:

[...]What constitutes harassment in this context may be determined with reference to antidiscrimination legislation and case law thereunder. This harassment ordinarily involves the active burdening of another, rather than mere passive failure to act properly.

[5] Harassment on the basis of sex, race, age, creed, religion, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, or marital status may violate either paragraph (g) or paragraph (h). The harassment violates paragraph (g) if the lawyer committed it in connection with the lawyer's professional activities. Harassment, even if not committed in connection with the lawyer's professional activities, violates paragraph (h) if the harassment (1) is prohibited by antidiscrimination legislation and (2) reflects adversely on the lawyer's fitness as a lawyer, determined as specified in paragraph (h).
[...] It is not required that the listed factors [that refers to the 4 factors in (h)] be considered equally, nor is the list intended to be exclusive. For example, it would also be relevant that the lawyer reasonably believed that his or her conduct was protected under the state or federal constitution or that the lawyer was acting in a capacity for which the law provides an exemption from civil liability. [...]

[8] A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of Rule 1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law.

We've also frequently and recently talked about other potentially applicable sections (unauthorized practice (5.5), etc.) before, so not repeating them, but there are quite a few one could make a case for, though in general they tend to relate to actions in a professional capacity. April would likely have grounds for his no-show and undeliverable email, though the impact of the ticket she had to pay is pretty small potatoes.
 
How tumultuous can the sentencing for Aaron be? He shared 1 picture with 1 person. Nick's acting like Aaron burned his house down.

Also, I'm doubting that Nick ignores and forgives anything. He has a book of grudges and seethes about every word said about him.
Nick pursuing the RP case (it subsequently going nowhere) is actually way more embarrassing for his wife and family than just letting it go, but of course Nick only cares about himself.
 
"but there are specific people and entities who went well beyond the bounds of criticism".
"I ignore and forgive a lot, but have been paying close attention to others."
"Man, I wonder what I can do with a law licence and a long memory".

Lmao, this galaxy-gas huffing child abuser thinks he can reclaim it all and sue anyone who doesn't toe the line.
Motherfucker is so vengeful that he got found abusing drugs, and is going to piss away his cash attempting public relations repair.

Bring it on faggot, Balldo Season 2 FOREVER
 
That last line is a bold one.

481.06 GENERAL DUTIES.Every attorney at law shall:
(1) observe and carry out the terms of the attorney's oath;

(2) maintain the respect due to courts of justice and judicial officers;

(3) counsel or maintain such causes only as appear to the attorney legal and just; but the attorney shall not refuse to defend any person accused of a public offense;

(4) employ, for the maintenance of causes confided to the attorney, such means only as are consistent with truth, and never seek to mislead the judges by any artifice or false statement of fact or law;

(5) keep inviolate the confidences of the attorney's client, abstain from offensive personalities, and advance no fact prejudicial to the honor or reputation of a party or witness, unless the justice of the cause requires it;

(6) encourage the commencement or continuation of no action or proceeding from motives of passion or interest; nor shall the attorney, for any personal consideration, reject the cause of the defenseless or oppressed.
 
Back