Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 105 34.4%

  • Total voters
    305
Or he is using CLE completion for another purpose. He will attempt to explain his failure to complete 80 hours community service with doing CLEs for MUH KEEDS, or perhaps even try to get the court to call his CLEs community service, because with a law license in good standing he is a man of the community don't you know? His grandiose view of himself knows no bounds. Remember when he offered to RUN the drug recovery thing? Lulzy. He only has about 5 weeks to perform 2 weeks of community service. I don't see him doing it, do you? He'll try some stupid crackbrain shit to avoid. More content for us!
This would be hilarious, I can see Nick smugly stating this to his PO just for them to turn around and say "no you stupid whitebread nigger, your picking up litter on the highway. Get your safety vest on."
 
In 2022 Nick went on a graphic, detailed rant about how he would rape anyone that crossed him

Bases on his recent behavior, I personally believe that this isn't hyperbolic and he genuinely wants to rape people he thinks have wronged him as a form of "revenge" similar to his favorite anime Redo of Healer
It's fortunate (and more than a little funny) that his dick is broken.
"I have no boner, and I must rape." :really:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Jaime Reyes
This would be hilarious, I can see Nick smugly stating this to his PO just for them to turn around and say "no you stupid whitebread nigger, your picking up litter on the highway. Get your safety vest on."
It's krooked kandy yoshi county, they'd probably accept it, tell him congratulations and hand him a bump on the downlow as a reward
 
Wouldn't the company that produces the CLE video's and site consider it copyrighted material and DMCA his stream for reproducing the material?

Example:

CLE Products purchased through the Website may be viewed, downloaded for caching purposes only, or printed, to the extent permitted from the Website for Your personal use, subject to the restrictions delineated in the Terms and Conditions. You must not republish material from the Website (including without limitation republication on another website); sell, rent or sublicense material from the Website; show any material from the Website in public; reproduce, duplicate, copy or otherwise exploit material on the Website for a commercial purpose; edit or otherwise modify any material on the Website; or redistribute material from the Website (except for content specifically and expressly made available for redistribution).
 
Nick is going to do his CLEs, train super hard every day and use his ultra lawyering to take Sean, Null,, Meme Copium, Elissa, Mama K, Kurt and AARON out for good.

Game over, man... Game over!

edit: forgot about Mama K and Kurt
You forgot dozens of Youtube creators who've maliciously wronged Nick's stellar reputation, similarly those on Rumble and Kick. @Third World Aristocrat is in deep trouble for heresy. Maybe he'll even go for @Himedall All-seeing Waifu for creating this very thread. Maybe he's coming for us! With enough lawyering, Nick will purge the entire internets of any allegations of infamy! And along the way he'll win the panties of every doe-eyed wine-mom, accruing a harem of such magnitude no one will doubt the the high-octane genius of his majesty.
 
My question is what are the actual damages of this case
Aaron will likely make a reasonable settlement of somewhere around $5000 - $10,000...In the long-term, $10,000 is five months of snack budget. Better to cut a deal and let Nick have his moment.
Nick is trying to artificially inflate the value of a KNU - which we all know has no value outside the lols.
He originally announced he WOULDN'T do the CLE because he'd prob
Nick has Liarrhea & only tells the truth where a lie won't fit. Should change his channel, etc. to Relieta Lies. (Liesplaining the Interwebs)
 

Attachments

  • 1750714463453.webp
    1750714463453.webp
    1.2 MB · Views: 4
Didn't he already disclose what the ethics investigation was about on his show?
Yes and no. I'm sorry to quote myself but apparently it's relevant.

This is from May 27:
- At 11:40ish Central, he left for at least 10 minutes to address an ETHICS COMPLAINT. Tagging @Useful_Mistake bc they're all over this. Details:
  • It's a complaint from 1 year ago
  • Nick said he couldn't find the email about it when addressing it (it was unclear the mode of communication)
  • He was told by the ethics person that it's being addressed now that his charges have been settled
  • He was asked to address his "rule violation," but said that the person on the phone didn't tell him what rule that was he may have violated.
  • He referenced Ayn Rand, saying that HE was not going to tell them any rule he may have violated
  • He said they referenced "imposition" of his crimes versus "adjudication" as an important distiction
  • He reiterated that he's never committed any dishonesty regarding soliciting or representing clients
Then on June 6, he did this:
- Threatens @RaptInPlastic with doxxing because he knows their name and address due to the ethics complaint.
 
Yes and no. I'm sorry to quote myself but apparently it's relevant.

This is from May 27:

Then on June 6, he did this:
Holy shit. He needs another complaint.

And lol, "couldn't find the email.". OK, Russell. Maybe if, as with matters concerning your clients, you managed your email properly, you'd have the info you need.

But I don't believe for a minute they didn't re-send him pertinent info if he requested it.

And sure, "no dishonesty" in soliciting or representing clients...except for calling himself a Minnesota lawyer and owner of a law firm in Minnesota.
 
OFFS, @ItsAaronIgnoreMe, PAY ATTENTION.

1750716503213.webp

This is is a threat. Aaron, stop looking at the lake from your parent's lake home whilst thinking about God or love or life or whatever. You can do that LATER. You better be armed and ready for battle on Wednesday. Rekieta may be an injured soldier but he's going to battle on Wednesday and is (apparently) filing a civil suit against you on the heels of it. This is not a subtle message.

FOCUS - file a civil suit right back, at the very least.
 
Worthwhile to read the comments as well, which appear after the rules. It's a fairly high bar to be found in violation of g/h. Two excerpts:

Thanks. That's very informative. If I'm understanding it correctly, it seems that there's an arguable case against him, but he's also got multiple arguable defences -- not least by claiming he had a good faith belief that his right to denigrate her on the basis of her sex/gender is part of his free speech rights.

I suppose that's what comes of living in a country that did away with free speech years ago. They lock people up for far less in the UK these days.
 
Aaron will likely make a reasonable settlement of somewhere around $5000 - $10,000, though I would heartily welcome mitigating evidence that Nick Rekieta had been reporting every instance of supposed breach, not the aggrieved party.
We all know Nick is a fanciful balldoskelly, his vindictive dreams of milking Aaron's every cent is a far fetched reality.
In the long-term, $10,000 is five months of snack budget. Better to cut a deal and let Nick have his moment.
Nick wants to humiliate Aaron. He’s been stewing on this for about a week. My guess is that he wants prison time at minimum and prison+a fine at maximum. I’m betting he’ll have a melt down if the judge doesn’t give him what he wants.

If we have anyone going to the hearing, please be careful of the Dabbleverse retards. They seem to be life ruination types going off their hatred of Aaron and will justify fucking with you overtly.
 
Yes and no. I'm sorry to quote myself but apparently it's relevant.

This is from May 27:

Then on June 6, he did this:
Thanks for the documentation, but to clarify, those are two separate ethics issues.

The first relates to his criminal charges and based on what Nick said, it's clear it was an actual investigation that is likely to result in some sort of discipline (this is what I was referring to).

The second related to someone allegedly trying to submit an ethics complaint over Nick badmouthing his former nanny, which is something that is stupid on its face irrespective of whether Nick is correct as to who was responsible, and why it makes sense that Nick stated it was dismissed without investigation. This isn't relevant.
 
Same energy:

View attachment 7546850

"My balldo …!"
That image has been filtered, luckily there was still an original copy:
blue_finger.webp
Old Blue Finger is at it again. He pays such close attention to every single move each and every enemy makes, there’ll be no rest for those numerous enemies as long as they linger about this mortal coil. Nick had a long talk with his Mommy mother, and she has agreed to provide her little man with enough funds to go after four of his enemies, annually. He can average one lawsuit per quarter & remain in the black.
 
I'd be surprised if he maintains his enthusiasm for lawfare after he eventually loses to Monty.
Meh, just watch as he scumbag-lawyers his way through the appeals.

I can’t wait for the “random passer by who happens to be an STMS fan” to recognize Melton and publicly humiliate him without even trying.
Will Melton pull a Ralph by trying to "cover for a friend" and get found in contempt of court?
 
Back