"Jim" / James Augustine née James Patrick O'Shaughnessy / Mister Metokur / Jim81Jim / Internet Aristocrat - His autistic videos and the gay beta "sweetie squad" who mindlessly suck his cock.

[Maeis]

I’d like it if I never learned these uoh weirdos existed. If my livelihood depended on taking money from them I would commit sudoku on a sci fi ice planet.

Just based on populations, a good amount of uohs are literally only doing it because they think its funny. That doesn't excuse it, it just means that they don't believe in the "lifestyle" or whatever you want to call it.

 

[Lidl Drip]

In the end there's two kinds of people. Those that think that grown men masturbating to depictions of children being raped are bad and those who don't. We know which side Kirsche, Pippa and Jim fall on.

Coincidentally all 3 of these people are childless with no investment in the future who only care about accumulating wealth for themselves. They don't have to care about the effects that sexualizing children on a wide scale will have on society and future generations. They only care about getting money and spending it on whatever hedonistic pleasures they indulge in. Alrighty then, it's a free country. But can we at least stop pretending that these people are "based" or hold conservative values? What are you conserving by being an anime prostitute who masturbates incels for a living? What do you conserve by being a weeb in a coomer dungeon dying of cancer? Nothing. Any libtard with a white child contributes more to society than Jim, Pippa or Kirsche ever will.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

But can we at least stop pretending that these people are "based" or hold conservative values?

Yes, this was certainly the conversation that we had before this stream of people patting each other on the back for being based and conservative, and not a discussion autistic screech fest on whether he was really sick or that he's a sellout for selling hats.

Oh no, online comedy leper that fucks an asian titty streamer isn't based? My worldview comes crashing down!

Being childless and corrupt is something you care about in politicians (like every european leader).

 

[Maeis]

In the end there's two kinds of people. Those that think that grown men masturbating to depictions of children being raped are bad and those who don't. We know which side Kirsche, Pippa and Jim fall on.

Coincidentally all 3 of these people are childless with no investment in the future who only care about accumulating wealth for themselves. They don't have to care about the effects that sexualizing children on a wide scale will have on society and future generations. They only care about getting money and spending it on whatever hedonistic pleasures they indulge in. Alrighty then, it's a free country. But can we at least stop pretending that these people are "based" or hold conservative values? What are you conserving by being an anime prostitute who masturbates incels for a living? What do you conserve by being a weeb in a coomer dungeon dying of cancer? Nothing. Any libtard with a white child contributes more to society than Jim, Pippa or Kirsche ever will.

Okay, but if Kirsche or Jim believe in social conservatism (anti LGBT, anti immigration, etc etc), then all of that doesn't matter because they fail the loli-q in your eyes? Hell, she said it was bad but it wasn't real. She said that it's fucking weird, regardless of excuses like 6000 year old physically six years old, and that she wouldn't trust lolicons around real children. Jim didn't disagree, so I assume he co-signs this. Now, should she have railed against loli for like x amount of minutes instead? Maybe, but it'd be pretty OOC to just go off on it in the middle of a conversation.

 

[Man In A Dress]

They don't have to care about the effects that sexualizing children on a wide scale will have on society and future generations.

Indeed, the damage Jim has caused by describing himself as Jimithea is devastating.
Though if you want to talk about Jims videos that cause change, I wouldn't be surprised if "How the sausage is made" affected some people and stopped them from making horrible life choices.

 

[TV's Adam West]

You didn’t make it past the Redemption Arc, I see.

Every time you open your mouth or move a muscle, it’s like you’re daring me to kick your ass, and I’m not one to turn down a challenge.

 

[Wodanaz]

So I need to defend not only vtubers but random people in the comment section too? Holy bad faith.

we're talking about pandering to loli, I have provided evidence of many people being pandered to. not to mention the very clip itself gets into the shit about deciding what exactly constitutes "loli", despite being a corporate employee which counters your previous assertion. regardless, it's clear her audience has many sexual freaks who don't care and are in fact thrilled to be able to post loli memes. giving these people attention is not advisable.

I have officially treated you with respect, as I might an actual person. I will henceforth go back to "joking" about how you should be put up against a wall and shot, in much the same way that anime people "joke" about wanting tot have sex with children.

if Kirsche or Jim believe in social conservatism (anti LGBT, anti immigration, etc etc), then all of that doesn't matter because they fail the loli-q

mutually exclusive. you can't be a conservative loli enjoyer for the same reason you can't be a conservative homosexual. it's just cognitive dissonance.

 

[Maeis]

we're talking about pandering to loli, I have provided evidence of many people being pandered to. not to mention the very clip itself gets into the shit about deciding what exactly constitutes "loli", despite being a corporate employee which counters your previous assertion. regardless, it's clear her audience has many sexual freaks who don't care and are in fact thrilled to be able to post loli memes. giving these people attention is not advisable.

I have officially treated you with respect, as I might an actual person. I will henceforth go back to "joking" about how you should be put up against a wall and shot, in much the same way that anime people "joke" about wanting tot have sex with children.

Okay. I don't agree that "pandering to loli" tars you with the same brush as lolicons, so I guess we just have to agree to disagree.

 

[Wodanaz]

Okay. I don't agree that "pandering to loli" tars you with the same brush as lolicons, so I guess we just have to agree to disagree.

I mean if I was an entertainer and I found out there was a not inconsiderable amount of pedophiles supporting me in random comment sections, I would have no problem disavowing and calling them out. But I guess you disagree since it's just jokes and they're just drawings, so please face the wall.

 

[Maeis]

I mean if I was an entertainer and I found out there was a not inconsiderable amount of pedophiles supporting me in random comment sections, I would have no problem disavowing and calling them out. But I guess you disagree since it's just jokes and they're just drawings, so please face the wall.

You're not stating my position correctly. I am not a lolicon apologizer. The people (well, at least Jim and Kirsche, I don't even know much about Pippa other than Jim memes) I'm talking about are not saying that loli is "okay" or "harmless.". They say things like "bad", "fucking weird", but it's not reality. This is 100% true. I do not take your wall threats seriously, of course, but I don't see any justice in walling people for that.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

so please face the wall.

I don't think you, or other are gonna do shit. People should. But when they do, they should focus on the people responsible. Are people that don't disavow sections of their own audience your first choice of helicopter ballast? What would the disavowing accomplish?

Also show some of the worst comments you've seen. Like some screenshots of his audience screaming cunny in chat or something like that. I haven't seen anything besides poorly substantiated screeching so far, so it's been hard to take serious. But with some evidence, sure.

 

[Man In A Dress]

I mean if I was an entertainer and I found out there was a not inconsiderable amount of pedophiles supporting me in random comment sections, I would have no problem disavowing and calling them out. But I guess you disagree since it's just jokes and they're just drawings, so please face the wall.

I don't think anyone could say with certainty that they would call out their own audience if it meant losing money. In a hypothetical it's nice to assume your beliefs would come first but you will never know unless that hypothetical becomes reality.

 

[Cyraxian Horror]

Scandinavian prudes BTFO!!!!!

 

[alan thicke]

Just based on populations, a good amount of uohs are literally only doing it because they think it’s funny. That doesn't excuse it, it just means that they don't believe in the "lifestyle" or whatever you want to call it.

I don’t doubt that. People will literally just go on the internet and say whatever shit they think will get a rise out of people. But these gross uoh posters are accepted members of these vtubers communities as far as I can tell.

In the clip Josh has referenced a lot that Jim brought up (but didn’t play, why didn’t you play the clip, Jim?) a member of kirches community she called “moon man” was using the name “pussy licking loli” and they joked about “licking lolis”. That isn’t a drive by weirdo in the comments.

So how many of these uoh enjoyers are doing it for the lols vs doing it for the lolis? I don’t care, I just wish they’d never entered my field or vision.

 

[Maeis]

I don’t doubt that. People will literally just go on the internet and say whatever shit they think will get a rise out of people. But these gross uoh posters are accepted members of these vtubers communities as far as I can tell.

In the clip Josh has referenced a lot that Jim brought up (but didn’t play, why didn’t you play the clip, Jim?) a member of kirches community she called “moon man” was using the name “pussy licking loli” and they joked about “licking lolis”. That isn’t a drive by weirdo in the comments.

So how many of these uoh enjoyers are doing it for the lols vs doing it for the lolis? I don’t care, I just wish they’d never entered my field or vision.

I agree with you, I find all of that shit gross. The only question is the actual lolicon population (and inside that, what the actual irl pedophile population is.)

To be clear, I don't think it's enough, being a lolicon, to be a bona fide legit face the wall pedophile. There's probably a ton of parallels, but I want proof that someone is watching cp, or god forbid, an acting pedophile before accusing them of that.

 

[Wodanaz]

The people (well, at least Jim and Kirsche, I don't even know much about Pippa other than Jim memes) I'm talking about are not saying that loli is "okay" or "harmless.". They say things like "bad", "fucking weird", but it's not reality. This is 100% true.

they also go on stream with others and """joke""" about "pussy licking lolis" and debate the finer points of what exactly constitutes loli with their chat which uses loli memes in response. but yeah, I'm totally the retard for trying to make 2 and 2 equal 4.
Wall.

I don't think anyone could say with certainty that they would call out their own audience if it meant losing money. In a hypothetical it's nice to assume your beliefs would come first but you will never know unless that hypothetical becomes reality.

I would literally starve before pandering to pedophiles.
these people are already well off by the way. that bitch made 150k from caffeine powder and pippa has been around for years with tons of devoted fans. they just don't care.

Also show some of the worst comments you've seen. Like some screenshots of his audience screaming cunny in chat or something like that. I haven't seen anything besides poorly substantiated screeching so far, so it's been hard to take serious. But with some evidence, sure.

literally watch the chat in the video. plenty of people crying and going uoh which is -the- pedophile meme.

 

[Idea Waifu]

Finally a Thread where i can say i hate Pippa, Kirsche and vtubers without getting banned like in the vtuber thread.

 

[Fat At The Internet]

Just based on populations, a good amount of uohs are literally only doing it because they think its funny. That doesn't excuse it, it just means that they don't believe in the "lifestyle" or whatever you want to call it.

If only there was a wigger adjacent term to use.
Cut a weeb a pedophile bleeds.

 

[Man In A Dress]

I would literally starve before pandering to pedophiles.

Respectfully, I seriously doubt that. Your morals and beliefs don't matter if you're hungry or homeless.

these people are already well off by the way. that bitch made 150k from caffeine powder and pippa has been around for years with tons of devoted fans. they just don't care.

Yes. And there's no reason to stop the money flowing.
There are no beliefs or morals. Whether they are just jokes or perversions showing, the bottom line is to entertain an audience to make money. I don't think the likes of Kirsche cares about what her audience likes and has no intention of making any statements that potentially reduces the number of paypig viewers. You can certainly be disgusted by these people with their UOH comments (ew) but thats 10 dollars to Kirsche. It's no surprise that she doesn't care what they personally like because its not her problem.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

Respectfully, I seriously doubt that. Your morals and beliefs don't matter if you're hungry or homeless.

That's exactly when they matter. It's easy to have them when you're comfortable. If you can be coerced into evil by discomfort, then you're not good.