UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk

https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png



7

10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See spread happiness's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton

https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary


42

10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See pg often's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
The Right have hijacked Englishness. Can it be reclaimed?

Today, the only people who dare speak of Englishness are cheerleaders for Brexit, exceptionalism and imperial nostalgia. But there is another England, hiding in plain sight, which is dramatically more inclusive and forward looking. Here, Caroline Lucas delves deep into England's literary history to sketch out alternative stories of who we are - ones that we can all embrace to build a greener, fairer future.
God this lady pisses me off to no end. Excuse my incoming rants I haven’t read this pile of drivel. But at least the right are telling us the real history. Not like the left trying to blackify ours to justify the boat people. Cheddarman was SubSaharan!! Black people built Stonehenge!! Black people were on Hadrians wall. Septimius Severus woz black!! A lot of this is thanks to the Tom Booth(white idiot leftist) from the National History museum who is responsible for the Cheddarman was black claims. He’s literally admitted he did it to “stop the white far right” & because of Brexit.
IMG_3706.webpIMG_3707.webpIMG_3704.webp
He had the cheek to post this after blacks started believing this crap & he was getting called out.
IMG_3705.webp
Hes now carrying on this trend by blackifying Neolithics btw.
IMG_3710.webp
Now we’ve got blacks everywhere tying to tell us everything was really black like Romans and Moors. (never mind that Romans never got anywhere near Subsaharan Africa) I’m suprised the Muslims haven’t got annoyed about the Moor thing actually, since they were actually Arabs and Berbers. And these people wonder why the right is rising?
 
Last edited:
The question now is to see whether Irreligion has a knock-on effect on the new generation of mudslimes.
With some non-practicing Muslims, they become quasi-Jews wherein they may not practice the religion but they still have a cultural affinity with it. Hasan Piker, Frogan, Javid, etcetera. The religion has a built-in name for all its adherents - ummah - that enshrouds all of them, regardless of sect and shit because they all constitute a single nation that transcends national borders (this partly inspired Ba'athism and why Islamic socialism is a thing - popular in Pakistan). So they can espouse the most Marxist, "class above ethnicity and fuck religion" sentiments possible, but they'll still defend their "fellow" Muslims from non-Muslims, even if the former is more likely to kill them than the latter. They'll also practice their religion in the same way a non-religious Jew might I.E. Hanukah in lieu of Christmas. Cultural/religious practices that go against the grain of the majority that stops them from even seeing themselves as being completely "British", diluting it themselves as "British Muslim" or "Pakistani British" and so on.

I don't actually think full integration is possible anymore, at least not in the way that "outsider" truly becomes "insider". They can get close, certainly. They could be British in every single metric that matters except one barrier: ethnicity. That keeps them perpetually on the edge of being an "insider" because, as morose as it might be, both they and the "insiders" themselves know they're not the same. In an optimal world (Like in Lethal Weapon), you would be able to acknowledge the differences but let them have no bearing for the most part. If the Muslims came over in the late 80s were irreligious, maybe (hard maybe) we'd of avoided the rapes and they wouldn't have this shared religious community that, whilst not actively carrying out the killing the non-Muslim majority on mass, still desire it somewhat. Preferring you convert implicitly is actually the most quaint position they can adopt in my experience, if you're not just outright ignoring the differences, as is optimal.

I think the fact I was actually friends with a few Muslims when I was younger is why I've personally capped out at "they need to leave" and not anything that'd warrant getting signposted as a copper. I think I was given a total of 3 Qu'rans over the time I knew them and I still can't bring myself to chuck 'em. In a scenario where time and distance hadn't eroded our friendship, and Supreme Leader Lowe passes the Edict of Expulsion II in 2032, I imagine the below would've been me come the time they got ferried to France.



I think for Muslims the best thing you could probably do to inoculate yourself from the worst of their behaviours is just transplant some Ahmadiyya and hope it spreads. They're Muslim Mormons basically. Some kooky beliefs (they think Jesus travelled East after pretending to be dead and died of old age in Kashmir looking for the lost tribes) but they seem relatively well-turned out. Fro what I've read they're basically less shifty Mormons, if you can believe that.

Also I can't not share this: "Prayer Duel":
1750929566941.webp
 
With some non-practicing Muslims, they become quasi-Jews wherein they may not practice the religion but they still have a cultural affinity with i
This is precisely the issue. We already had one in-group tribe operating for their own interests by which they can rule over the host nation. now we have another one.

I don't actually think full integration is possible anymore, at least not in the way that "outsider" truly becomes "insider".

Not only isn't integration possible, it is wholly unnecessary for them demographically. their group will be the group that demands white people have to integrte into. they will be the dominant national group
 
The big thing that enables these groups to continue acting the way they do is their independence and charity status. You can raise awareness about the fact they're aiding these people but the negative PR will only work on everyone who isn't already aware of what the charity does already.
I don't mean just going after them through the courts. The general public don't like the small boats. If they could see the names and faces of the people helping those they would be spit on on the street. They wouldn't be able to live a normal life the same way people like Morgoth's review can't now. Use social shaming to make people scared to be part of the groups and those groups will lose steam very quickly. They think the right wing is a terrorist group just waiting to go postal, building on that paranoia by having them named and shamed would work on the type of women who do this.

There could be chuds here she thought, neo nazis just ready to kidnap and put her in a breeding farm.
As she got wet at the thought.
So far as I know, Lauren Southern is still banned from the UK for Terrorism.
Southern should be banned on the grounds of being a walking bioweapon. She slept around constantly to get youtube access. She was just another whore who picked a side with less competition.

This is precisely the issue. We already had one in-group tribe operating for their own interests by which they can rule over the host nation. now we have another one.
You can't have rival ethnic groups or life styles competing with your home culture. It always turns into a competition for space and resources. The nice Chinese family can run a take away but they have kids, who have kids and then you have a China town with 100 extra people competing for local jobs and houses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GloJojo and Zoot
@>IMPLYING I mean who doesn't like Mormons. They're wholesome as fuck. Probably something I have said before so apologies if I have. I left my ex husband in 2015. He gave me an absolute pasting before I left- black eyes,broken ribs and nose,the works.

I very literally ran into two Mormon sister missionaries and I will never forget what they said on seeing me. "Shall we call the Bishop? No,call his *wife*". And they did. And they got me back to my mum,nigh on 500 miles away, they put me up in a hotel for a few nights before they could get me on a flight. I was invited to the bishops home for food. And to this day, a decade later I still send those two young ladies,and their former Bishop, a a Christmas card.

The LDS church has its faults (under the banner of heaven is a god read if you're interested) but the individual men and women,both lay people and missionaries are wonderful human beings in my experience.

His nibs and I are wedding next month with a view to being temple sealed as Mormons and hoping for him to get a job in Utah with part of company he works for. Sure no caffeine and booze sucks but the trade off is a racially homogeneous community and the benefits of that cannot be understated.
 
I’m suprised the Muslims haven’t got annoyed about the Moor thing actually, since they were actually Arabs and Berbers. And these people wonder why the right is rising?
We did get this a while back.
1750929840947.webp
Here's a quote from the trailer:



I'm guessing Moors don't really get brought up because I don't think American blacks are as aware of Moorish Spain as they are Egypt. Also the most famous Moorish character in fiction - Othello - is typically portrayed as a black man everywhere so I think how they're depicted racially is a ship that has long since sailed.

Reminds me of Thomas Lockley, the guy who also tried to elevate the importance of a black man in Oda Nobunaga's retinue into a full-on samurai. They create fiction out of history for much the same reason trannies try to insert themselves as having been in it: it's a way for them to legitimise certain ideas, philosophies, as well as their existence. Oda making a black man a samurai is meant to posit that people are naturally tolerant and accepting and always have been, discrimination and in-group preference is just arbitrary and forced, perhaps a creation of recent history, or some other drivel. You've probably seen the argument made that racism didn't exist before slavery and all that? Same general vicinity. You can see the purpose behind it being espoused and it's not cute.

"Thomas Lockley lied to the entire world and presented his fan fiction as historical fact and edited wikipedia for ten years and tried to hide what he was doing. He blames Assassin's Creed for the 'hate mail' when really he's only mad that he got caught."

"To Yasuke-warrior believers who can't read Japanese. Thomas Lockley wrote a 400+ page fantasy novel out of 15 lines of obscure historical record. Problem is that he presented it as an academic book and many major foreign media & academic believed the fraud."

Septimius Severus woz black!!
Not the only Roman emperor the colloquial they do this with. Trannies claim Elagabalus as one of if not the earliest recorded instance of a tranny in history. One BBC article:
1750930921776.webp
1750931003503.webp
I'll laud them on appropriating an accurate to life MTF though.
1750931181473.webp

1750931207259.webp


the final battle is really now between those who want the mutt monoculture I.e. integration an those who want the white monoculture. the only middle ground is endless and worsening social unrest.

those are the options.

And the most verboten people of our recent past were the ones who all said this was coming
They won't even get their "mutt monoculture" since all the ethnic groups who come here tend to self-segregate anyway. Even if we got someone like Lowe in and incentivised deportations implemented, I don't think we're getting a white monoculture. I think we'd get back over 90/95%white but otherwise a lot of people out of place here, unless paid substantially, wouldn't want to leave. Not because of some inherent superior quality tied to our country, but because whilst they act out a façade of maintaining their own culture and identity, there are plenty here who have never even set foot in their parent's or grandparent's country of origin and thus feel no actual ties to it. I think realistically our optimal outcome is to reduce them to so small a number through unoppressive yet non-constricting laws (halal, circumcision and niqab/burqa bans) and incentivised deportation that asserting their cultural/racial/religious identity is more of a hindrance than a boon.

For instance, the common pet of the British civnat are the Sikhs. They're chummy, friendly, don't want us implicitly dead. However as a group they number less than a million. Turn that figure nto millions, and you probably get Khalistan protests like the Canadians do. If you have a million or less of a non-native group, that group won't see itself as being powerful enough to act as a bloc and won't remain calcitrant regarding their cultural identity. That kumbaya shit from before would only work in a scenario where there's so few in the country that the minority groups will have no choice but to be assimilated.

But hey, if they think something nasty is coming up for anyone who stays, they'll leave of their own volition probably.

I think in the end we'll just ease into the change we want and look back in hindsight, wondering what took so long considering how easy it ultimately ends up being.
 
For instance, the common pet of the British civnat are the Sikhs. They're chummy, friendly, don't want us implicitly dead. However as a group they number less than a million. Turn that figure nto millions, and you probably get Khalistan protests like the Canadians do. If you have a million or less of a non-native group, that group won't see itself as being powerful enough to act as a bloc and won't remain calcitrant regarding their cultural identity. That kumbaya shit from before would only work in a scenario where there's so few in the country that the minority groups will have no choice but to be assimilated.
Can we stop the sikh ball washing? It's civic nationalism when you try to make excuses for why it's okay for some foreigners to be here and not others. Sikhs have become the "Democrats are the real racists" meme. Even if they're very nice people who helped our country they still aren't us and you're letting a foreign element grow in your country. Any foreign element is competition to the natives and it will not settle for being second best forever.

Everyone who isn't English, Scottish, Welsh or Irish has to go. If you want your foreign wife you have to go with her. Anything less is leaving cancer untouched because you got most of it so it should be okay. The home nations can have their own independent white cultures and we will get along just fine without sikhs. They aren't needed, they aren't wanted and I am tired of people saying 'honourary whites!" about every brown or yellow person they come across. We have to look after ourselves and only ourselves. We're out numbered and hold very little land (and Starmer keeps giving it away). We don't have the space for foreigners if we want to have space for our future offspring.
 
I think in the end we'll just ease into the change we want and look back in hindsight, wondering what took so long considering how easy it ultimately ends up being.
It's one of those situations where the very actions one side takes to achieve their goal inevitably leads to the opposite side having to escalate.

An example: When the libtards push this rewriting of British history like you showed with the museum guy; he is doing that to try and combat the write and boost integration, but it also pushes more people to the right. And the more the right pushes back hard, the more tards like the museum guy pull that shit.

we are in a spiral towards an outcome.

Can we stop the sikh ball washing?
I'm in agreement.

We need White racial solidarity in Britain. And all BAMEs must go.

Civic nationalism is just liberalism within an economic zone. It ignores basic reality of how groups function and how strong a drive race is to in-group formations, and how devastatingly cancerous those minority groups can be to the host people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't actually think full integration is possible anymore, at least not in the way that "outsider" truly becomes "insider". They can get close, certainly. They could be British in every single metric that matters except one barrier: ethnicity. That keeps them perpetually on the edge of being an "insider" because, as morose as it might be, both they and the "insiders" themselves know they're not the same.
Integration only happens with inter-marriage. There are those of the Iranian diaspora of the late 70s who married Europeans, who's children went on to marry Europeans and their children now have an Iranian grandparent and might celebrate certain aspects of that, like food, traditional dress, certain holidays, but to all other extents are European. If a diaspora sticks together, lives in enclaves and only marries within their community, integration will never happen.

As much as I can understand the instinct to live among people of your former community if you are forcibly displaced, it should be actively prevented by host countries. If you come to a new country, its your duty to fit into the new country fully and you can't do that if you create an enclave of it. It doesn't mean never meeting with old friends or celebrating positive aspects of your old culture, but it does mean that the vast majority of time you enthusiastically immerse yourself into the new culture.
 
Integration only happens with inter-marriage. There are those of the Iranian diaspora of the late 70s who married Europeans, who's children went on to marry Europeans and their children now have an Iranian grandparent and might celebrate certain aspects of that, like food, traditional dress, certain holidays, but to all other extents are European. If a diaspora sticks together, lives in enclaves and only marries within their community, integration will never happen.
Rate me autistic but this is also a problem. It brings in racial flaws into an other wise solid gene pool. Having an Iranian grandparent means you have problems a pure European line doesn't. Racial genetics matter and we don't need outside taint. If you want to go bleach them then fine, but I don't want to live in a society of mutts either. They have identity issues and often lead to terrorism and mass murder events because of it.
 
Rate me autistic but this is also a problem.
It's a massive problem and impossible on the scale of brown immigration we have seen.

Some immigration/emigration between white European countries is inevitable and has always happened not a problem.

A degree of brown inflation into the gene pool can be white washed and their shitty genes excluded over time.

But 25% of the population. There is not integration or assimilation through breeding. There is only the genocide of the existing race. Integration and assimilation should be seen in the current situation as calls for white genocide.

What do you guys think about this?
Screenshot 2025-06-26 12.07.57.webpGuXDnGqXEAAkp6f.webp
Link
Archive
 
New racist theory: Black (African) women, as a group, disproportionately use the lifts at tube stations when they clearly don't need to (i.e. not disabled, no heavy case, bike or pram) and are just being lazy.

Otterly, can you come and shame this lot too please?
Black women imported from Africa (as in educated, brought up there) are probably the most low IQ individuals you will ever see in your life. Black kids growing up in the UK at least have some semblance of education, but these braindead niggers have already hit the threshold where they struggle to learn anymore and they know practically fuck all.

They will completely balloon out in size because they can't grasp that eating a lot = getting fat. They see the UK as a golden ticket where they can get a husband and then never have to work another day in their lives. They cannot be trusted to operate a basic appliance without potentially causing a fire. They have no concept of hygiene. Worst of all, they're heavily involved in care and nursing so they're potentially causing needless deaths of thousands of people through the spread of disease or mistreatment.

I'm 100% convinced that these retards have completely falsified their entire education and are putting a lot of people in harms way.
 
I don't mean just going after them through the courts. The general public don't like the small boats. If they could see the names and faces of the people helping those they would be spit on on the street. They wouldn't be able to live a normal life the same way people like Morgoth's review can't now. Use social shaming to make people scared to be part of the groups and those groups will lose steam very quickly. They think the right wing is a terrorist group just waiting to go postal, building on that paranoia by having them named and shamed would work on the type of women who do this.
Naming them and calling them out specifically may constitute incitement. If you notice in the tweet linked by @Zoot regarding the commission, all the names put out there were for public political figures whilst the rest were unmentioned. The trustees of the charity are rather easy to find right now I'll do just one: MX Sim Eldem, who did the name-equivalent of using so unique a username that they'd instantly be called out on the Farms for it. Also a they/them tranny Turk.
1750933390830.webp
But you can't call these individuals out in any significant capacity because that'd be construed as an incitement of violence. They don't qualify as "public figures" because the only way to find out who they are is to look into the charity online and look into the trustees and leadership which is typically nested. Also they appear to have a fast turnover on trustees since the current lot are different from the last.


Also worth noting, and not listed on their website, is that they support people in staying here. Final number is of note. Out of 379 people lying about their age, 206 were not vindicated.
1750935841943.webp


Can we stop the sikh ball washing? It's civic nationalism when you try to make excuses for why it's okay for some foreigners to be here and not others. Sikhs have become the "Democrats are the real racists" meme. Even if they're very nice people who helped our country they still aren't us and you're letting a foreign element grow in your country. Any foreign element is competition to the natives and it will not settle for being second best forever.

Everyone who isn't English, Scottish, Welsh or Irish has to go. If you want your foreign wife you have to go with her. Anything less is leaving cancer untouched because you got most of it so it should be okay. The home nations can have their own independent white cultures and we will get along just fine without sikhs. They aren't needed, they aren't wanted and I am tired of people saying 'honourary whites!" about every brown or yellow person they come across. We have to look after ourselves and only ourselves. We're out numbered and hold very little land (and Starmer keeps giving it away). We don't have the space for foreigners if we want to have space for our future offspring.
I agree with the Sikh stuff, I was just pointing why they appear harmless: they don't have the numbers to exert themselves.
I've given reasons why civnat argumentation ought to be avoided:
First and second.
TLDR: It weakens anti-immigration stances considerably and make you look weak. It also proposes we can integrate millions of people who clearly don't want to be integrated at all.
@>IMPLYING I mean who doesn't like Mormons. They're wholesome as fuck. Probably something I have said before so apologies if I have. I left my ex husband in 2015. He gave me an absolute pasting before I left- black eyes,broken ribs and nose,the works.

I very literally ran into two Mormon sister missionaries and I will never forget what they said on seeing me. "Shall we call the Bishop? No,call his *wife*". And they did. And they got me back to my mum,nigh on 500 miles away, they put me up in a hotel for a few nights before they could get me on a flight. I was invited to the bishops home for food. And to this day, a decade later I still send those two young ladies,and their former Bishop, a a Christmas card.

The LDS church has its faults (under the banner of heaven is a god read if you're interested) but the individual men and women,both lay people and missionaries are wonderful human beings in my experience.

His nibs and I are wedding next month with a view to being temple sealed as Mormons and hoping for him to get a job in Utah with part of company he works for. Sure no caffeine and booze sucks but the trade off is a racially homogeneous community and the benefits of that cannot be understated.
There's nothing wrong with Mormons individually, my main compunction is with it's shiftiness and of the actual church itself. Once you're a member, you're then expected to donate 10% of your salary to the church, because whilst it is "voluntary", it's also a commandment so you're violating something by not doing so in essence. Also Joseph Smith's entire deal, like marrying 30 women with some of them being 14 year olds, alongside the story of the original manuscript being lost so he found second plates meaning the new manuscript would be somewhat different. Also all the events around "Revelation 2". Mostly little niggles like that.

Mormons are nice people; I even attended a service once because I felt obligated to. Also marked the first time I spoke to an American in person.
 
Re: religion. I'm completely irreglious and would describe as an agnostic atheist (I don't have any positive beliefs about the divine, but I'm not claiming knowledge). However, I'd go along with a religion and take part in its culture if it meant getting all the browns out of my country

I'd like to to be one of those ones where I don't have to commit too much to it though.
 
I think Lowe and Farage are too mired in political kayfabe to do something that overtly pro-white. Still not there yet. Lowe might be in a year or two though. I think if the concept of Pakis being "anti-white" proliferated then Lowe might adopt more nativist rhetoric in counter. Also younger Reform MPs with less of a commitment to a career in politics might be willing to table it. As a contingency I'll pay for Reform membership in 2028 and see if I can't get on the ballot for my area and hope Reform just sweep the election so I hardly have to do anything to win it. I'll chuck the proposal in the private members bills list and see. Might be worth the self-dox.
That is actually brilliant - I've emailed a screenshot of what Paul has said to my local Reform UK PPC who'll hopefully take it up with Nigel and the top brass.
>Nigel
1750936795625.webp

Kidding. Good on you for forwarding it. Hopefully it doesn't just get dismissed without reading. It would be a brilliant trap for MPs to to fall into and might expedite the above.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Made In Wales
@>IMPLYING That's a great find, and any charity which has that many people coming and going is a grift and needs to be called out.

My thoughts on these charities:

I'm not one to frequent McDonald's, but on the off chance that I wanted a stodgy under-cooked Big Mac and lukewarm tea (yummy!) I would at least know where the beef in the beef patty came from as it can be traced back to a farm and I'd know that Animal Welfare Guidelines were followed. I'd at least feel a bit better knowing what my money was buying, where from and that 'Bessie' was humanely killed.

The same cannot be said for any charity - where exactly does my donation go?

I had this discussion with Mike Craven-Todd online (if you've ever seen those Water Aid ads, he's the 'Camera Man' who asks for your money) and his monotonous response is:

'Well I've seen what good your money can do'
'We need your money or there is no future for these children'
'If you can help, please give - it is the kind thing to do'

Complete non-answers, where will my money end up Michael?

You've seen what good my money can do? Okay and I've seen Jesus Christ in a Tutu singing 'La Bamba'.

I bet you my money has gone into either funding their lavish lifestyles or funding 'fact-finding trips' to child brothels in Lesotho.
 
This is the type of lawyer I'm talking about. Completely legal, non violent but extremely impactful. Why wasn't this proposed decades ago?


I'm 100% convinced that these retards have completely falsified their entire education and are putting a lot of people in harms way.
Around my way we're seeing a lot of dangerous driving because blacks without licenses are getting cars handed to them on falsified licenses. Cleaners and NHS workers driving like it's Mario Kart.

I was walking down a middle class town's high street the other day and I saw the most vile thing this island ever created. An ugly, tattooed dumpy woman who clearly has a pet nog she's dragging around with her. It's so obvious no one else wants those women so they shake up with foreigners because AIDS is better than nothing I guess. A woman with a push chair was coming the opposite way and she gave her the dirtiest look I've ever seen. If she could have struck them with lightning she would have done it twice. It was great to see. Those women are a huge problem and they need to be shoved back into the council estates where they belong. Alone, with no PG tips or dags.
 
I think Lowe and Farage are too mired in political kayfabe to do something that overtly pro-white. Still not there yet. Lowe might be in a year or two though. I think if the concept of Pakis being "anti-white" proliferated then Lowe might adopt more nativist rhetoric in counter. Also younger Reform MPs with less of a commitment to a career in politics might be willing to table it. As a contingency I'll pay for Reform membership in 2028 and see if I can't get on the ballot for my area and hope Reform just sweep the election so I hardly have to do anything to win it. I'll chuck the proposal in the private members bills list and see. Might be worth the self-dox.

>Nigel
View attachment 7559179
Kidding. Good on you for forwarding it. Hopefully it doesn't just get dismissed without reading. It would be a brilliant trap for MPs to to fall into and might expedite the above.
honestly i've been thinking of infiltrating the party as well. tbh, taking over an established party with nativist members is probably the strongest path through political means.

This is the type of lawyer I'm talking about. Completely legal, non violent but extremely impactful. Why wasn't this proposed decades ago?
Also it's a good thing to have on hand when people say that we aren't being genocided. we are under the UN definition.

And when they deny it point out that one of acknowledge stages of a genocide is that people deny it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back