US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/

 

[mentally retarded user]

Thomas and Alito retiring to ensure they're replaced in a Republican term () and Sotomayor dropping dead means Trump will have put six out of nine concurrently serving Justices on the bench. That's gotta be the most since the founding.

One of the perks of winning the election three times.

 

[WelperHelper99]

It's still the Navy, so only about 25% less gay.

Yes but it happened on Pride Month, so the anti gay of renaming the navy oiler multiplies by 4. 100% less gay. Who is Oscar V. Peterson anyway?

 

[cockaine]

We have had 200 years of laws against obscenity and the distribution of pornographic content. These laws have never led to general prohibitions on books, general laws on political speech, general regulations on the distribution of speech, general laws against immoral speech, and so on. In other words, we have centuries of history showing that regulation of pornography does not lead ineluctably to aboloshing the First Amendment. You need a compelling argument for why this time is different.

This isn't true. We had loose laws around "disturbing fiction" that would land people jail time or heavy fines.

 

[Fcret]

We have had 200 years of laws against obscenity and the distribution of pornographic content. These laws have never led to general prohibitions on books, general laws on political speech, general regulations on the distribution of speech, general laws against immoral speech, and so on. In other words, we have centuries of history showing that regulation of pornography does not lead ineluctably to aboloshing the First Amendment. You need a compelling argument for why this time is different.

The Comstock Act

 

[LORD IMPERATOR]

We have had 200 years of laws against obscenity and the distribution of pornographic content. These laws have never led to general prohibitions on books, general laws on political speech, general regulations on the distribution of speech, general laws against immoral speech, and so on. In other words, we have centuries of history showing that regulation of pornography does not lead ineluctably to aboloshing the First Amendment. You need a compelling argument for why this time is different.

Yes, and in those 200 years, said ban on porn was skirted by books and media. There was no shortage of pornographic literature in the Victorian era, and as far back as the latter half of the 1900s, they sold "Tijuana Bibles" which were literal porn comics.

The laws were on the books, but people skirted around them all the time, and that's not even discussing the fact that prostitution used to be a legal institution in the earlier years of the USA.

Also, they did eventually try to censor media, just not specifically porn; the Comics Code Authority went so far as to censor a lot of media that isn't porn, which led to comics being dominated by basic capeshit stories since they were palatable to children.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Sotomyer's opinion show how fucking little she actually knows about how the law should work.

She's bitching that the district judges were in the right because Trump's EO is evil. That's what it boils down too. She moans on and on about how what Trump is doing is bad and how the other Justices are overlooking that "fact". IE: I don't like Trump nor his policies but the legal facts are not on my side so lets go with feelings instead. The bog standard Lib approach to anything where facts aren't in their favor.

Bitch that's not what before the court, you Miss High and Mighty Sotomayer don't get to pick what is good and bad for the people of America. That is what elections are for. Your only role is to rule on whether or not a Law is permissible by the Constitution as it was written and how it pertains to it. That's it.

Before you was the issues whether or not district courts could over-rule the POTUS by way of issuing nation wide injuctions affects all of the country of which your dissent said nothing. Because we all know Libs like you love to rule from the bench and see yourself as the real honest and true power in the US so there was never a chance you were going to not agree with your fellow Libs. The path to hell is paved with good intentions and Sotomayer would chop down every tree in dight if it meant her side would win damned the long term conquences.

This cunt is an embarrassment to the SCOTUS even more then the She-boon and I can only begin to imagine the seething anger and hatred that the HNIC Thomas must have for her.

TLDR: Get fucked you Lib cucks, judges are not elected so they don't get to LARP as POTUS just because you have a fancy title and a black robe.

 

[merpalerpaherp]

After reading some of the opinions issued, liberals are literally soviet era communists.
Republican majority: The State shouldn't have more control than the parent.
Lberal minority: The State should have control for whatever it deems neccessary.

 

[inetsone]

We have had 200 years of laws against obscenity and the distribution of pornographic content. These laws have never led to general prohibitions on books, general laws on political speech, general regulations on the distribution of speech, general laws against immoral speech, and so on. In other words, we have centuries of history showing that regulation of pornography does not lead ineluctably to aboloshing the First Amendment. You need a compelling argument for why this time is different.

There is no argument that need be made because this isn't hypothetical or philosphical. It already exists and politicians and corporations openly talk about expanding it.

https://www.dhs.gov/obim

 

[Gottahavemysips]

I've said it before and I'll say it again: JD Vance, needs to weild his constitutional power as President of the Senate. I expect Thune to cuck, and it's no surprise to me that the Democrat parliamentarian is ripping the BBB to shreds. But JD Vance is supposed to be *our* guy, he's MAGA. If he's going to abandon the BBB to protect "institutional norms" rather than the interests of the American people, then I will blame him since he's the only one I ever expected would do anything to help.

He fucking better, the only thing I figure I'm realistically going to get here is suppressors and SBRs. If we lose those provisions from the bill, then I'm done with the GOP. Getting rid of illegals is something I like, but not if they are immediately going to be replaced by the Jeet horde the second some space clears up. I've given up hope on movement against the "legal" replacement of Americans, so at least give me this one actual win.

 

[autistic dog]

Whenever you talk of the gays just outshitlord the faggot lovers. Go into excruciating detail about your favorite gay acts. Talk at length how much more romantic than straight people it is that they are willing to suck the cum out of each other's assholes after dropping a load. How much they must love someone to take their pozzed load of hiv positive cum knowing it will shorten their life and put extra burden on the Healthcare system. How they have much higher loyalty they have to put on a puppy mask and crawl around on all fours. How much more realistic a tranny neo vagina is than the failure of gods natural creation. How pure a man breast feeding their own child milk full of artificial hormones is compared to slutty boring regular women doing so.

If anyone even so much dares to disagree or has the audacity to tell you to stop going into detail call them a disgusting homophobic nazi and demand they explain why they think its ok to insult or denigrate gay people.

 

[pwnest injun]

SCOTUS just told the district courts to fuck themselves.
6-3 ACB wrote it.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf

Dissent is the liberal women crying about birthright which ACB says is premature cuz the case wasn’t even about birthright.

“federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch; they resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given them. When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too."

“We observe only this:JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while em-bracing an imperial Judiciary."

So, to explain what the ruling means, for USPOL tourists, if someone wants to challenge one of Trump's EOs, they have to go before a court and argue their case. EACH INDIVIDUAL. So, every TDA sleaze getting deported under the Alien Enemies act has to try and hire a lawyer. Some Guatamalan criminal alien tries to pop out a beanie baby? Gonna need a lawyer.

This is how it's always worked for everything else, like why GOA suing over the pistol brace ruling meant that GOA members got an injunction of enforcement while the law was challenged in the courts, but other people could still catch a felony over that ATF ruling.

 

[Fatpacks]

He fucking better, the only thing I figure I'm realistically going to get here is suppressors and SBRs. If we lose those provisions from the bill, then I'm done with the GOP. Getting rid of illegals is something I like, but not if they are immediately going to be replaced by the Jeet horde the second some space clears up. I've given up hope on movement against the "legal" replacement of Americans, so at least give me this one actual win.

He's not going to. He hasn't even spoken about this once. The BBB is a failure.

 

[mentally retarded user]

gay nigga story time case
6-3 Alito writing libcucks dissenting

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-297_4f14.pdf

The court first holds that the parents are likely to succeed on their claim that the policy of not allowing opt-outs unconstitutionally burdens their exercise of their religion.
“we have long recognized," Alito writes, "the rights of parents to direct 'the religious upbringing' of their children. And we have held that those rights are violated by government policies that substantially interfere with the religious development of children."

Sotomayor: The reverberations of the Court’s error will be felt, I fear,for generations. Unable to condone that grave misjudgment, I dissent.

Taqiyya award.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

Rare Muslim W for us!

God damnit, the Falafel eating cave niggers did us a solid for once. You win this time, but I'll get you next time Mohammad, NEXT TIME!!!!

lol. She was called out bigtime.

Wow. What did she do to piss people off? I mean there's the obvious but she clearly went AWOL with this one.

See. Its not over. I will continue dooming for two more weeks

Until Morale improves or to slow the spread?

Lawyer who represented 96 Jan 6th people and spent 22 years as a federal prosecutor gives his take

Watching ACB descend into embracing her inner cracker in real time is what I voted for.

Gavin Newsom sues Fox News for $787M in defamation case over Trump call

Nigga what? Okay, where's your proof of what the call entailed? There were screenshots from Trump's phone alleging the story Waters said. How do we know YOU'RE not lying NewsCum? Oh and now the press lying matters? How about Family Man Abrego? Oh and prove damages, faggot.

He's not going to. He hasn't even spoken about this once. The BBB is a failure.

I love you so much, Reverse Oracle. Null needs to pin that tag to your banner.

 

[PointOfNoReturnPoint]

God damnit, the Falafel eating cave niggers did us a solid for once. You win this time, but I'll get you next time Mohammad, NEXT TIME!!!!

Next time the falafel with extra sauce will be from waffle house and come with pain.

 

[Turkey Beef]

Regardless of how one feels about the US government's attack on Iran’s nuclear weapons program, the fact is that it was the greatest foreign policy achievement in memory. Predictably, neoliberals want to deny him the political capital Trump has earned.

To this end, Deep State subhumans left over from the age of John Brennan leaked selective disinformation from a likely bogus report downplaying the mission’s success. The conduit was none other than CNN’s Natasha Bertrand. Karoline Leavitt explains why she was an apt choice:
https://xcancel.com/RapidResponse47/status/1938290608755331079

If something out of the "intelligence" community jibes conveniently with what the shitlibs running the media would like you to think, chances are it is no more true than the Russian disinformation lie they used to keep the Hunter Biden laptop revelations from sparing humanity of Biden’s disastrous presidency.

 

[Fcret]

Watching faggots champion an Israeli bureaucracy tracking your IRL identity and correlating it with your internet history (because surprise surprise, all these age verification operations are Israeli) on kiwifarms of all places is a massive blackpill. You people deserve to have the Democrat boot on your throats when the cycle comes around again.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

lol wtf.. He wants all states to raise their rates to the increase he wants.

https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1938230440483262636

View attachment 7559699
View attachment 7559710

You think Louis Rossmann will finally have a mental break from reality and realize that retards like this fucked him and other small businesses?

 

[Day of the Cope]

people who cheer on age verification, on Kiwi Farms of all places, which will absolutely lead to ID requirements for all webpages that will completely kill the internet as we know it is always so strange

"Oh, but that's a slippery slope fallacy and can't happen! Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to inform people how gay marriage leads to grooming children into being trans!"

 

[Chuckwagon]

So, this month started with the USNS Harvey Milk being renamed, is ending with SCOTUS ruling that parents can in fact protect their kids from having the rainbow barfed down their throat on religious grounds, and has had a much more muted take on Pride by the corporate world in-between. A pretty good Pride Month, but I daresay still far from the best: that prize can rightly only go to the Pride Month where Obergefell v. Hodges is overturned and whatever shit law Congress passed to make gay marriage into the law of the land on a federal level (don't remember its name atm but it had a bunch of 'based' Republican supporters, like Nancy Mace) also gets declared unconstitutional.