US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: the aging locust., Hassou Tobi, Based Downie and 145 others
Click to expand...
Libs spent a few years getting pissed off about groups like America First Legal getting injunctions against stuff they wanted to do like student debt relief. So I suppose they just have a few years until they can enjoy putting forth that stuff again without the courts being able to stop them the second time around.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: WelperHelper99
GunCar Gary said:
i'd argue a more appropriate real life metaphor is having a state pass a law saying that it's required that you scan your ID to prove you're over 18 to enter the property of any business that contains pornographic material

then years later when democrats are in charge of the state they classify the bible as pornographic and prevent children from being able to go to church, and after many lawsuits the now democrat controlled supreme court okays it

"how could this happen to me?" asks the cuckservative. "that law was just supposed to ban things that i don't like, not be used on me"
Click to expand...
Fatpacks said:
Couldn't have said it better myself. The blackpill is the only logical position at this point. We get what we fucking deserve.

Mass suicides on our side of the aisle are inevitable once Dems take back power. It will make tranny suicide rates look like a joke in comparison.
Click to expand...
If existential enemies re-seizing the reins of power is an inevitability to you, then don't talk about policy. What you're arguing for is a civil war and purges. Obviously. You can't have a government where malicious actors occupy the hot-seat every few years.

The porn situation needs to be sorted out now—not by retarded parents, but by the state. It's an unironic weapon being used against the population. This is way beyond the scope of the average (modern) parent's ability to understand, let alone deal with: as far as this issue goes, Americans might as well be the South Sudanese. This is an area where rulers have to actually rule. Most people aren't rational actors and you can't treat them like it; that's why the state is even necessary and why Libertarianism (and classical liberalism in general) is a pipe-dream for 110 IQ autists.

You can say that parents should deal with it, and you're right—but they won't. "Should" doesn't matter here.

What's your alternative? Maintaining libertarian detachment until your enemy's next turn? They won't: they'll use power to move the needle for the population, just as they've done since Wilhelm Reich up to now. Even if you roll-back their policy (you won't with your eggshell-walking mindset), they've already molded a generation.

And if you do want to seize power for people who aren't your existential enemies, permanently, then you'll need a support-base of people who aren't totally brainwashed. Any spiritual or symbolic victory is an opportunity to expand that pool. Leftists understand that.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Blindeye and 12 others
Useful_Mistake said:
Bro, shut the fuck up, you stupid fucking nigger. Nobody gives a shit whether it was your whore mother sucking cock that invented gay sex or whether it was Mossad or Muhamed, or some greek fuck boy, or some faggot of other faggy proportions. We're talking politics here, not history or historiography of gay fucking sex.

Like holy shit, just go fuck a homeless man and get it over with
Click to expand...
You are the gayest person to ever live
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: GhastlyGhost, namelesstacotruck, Endless Torment and 3 others
its so funny to read this the libtards/left where all up in arms to support all there lovely terror groups in the middle east and bitch and cry over dying muslims, and as a little thankful they sue the school system to make them stop pushing there gay stuff on to there kids!

will they learn something from this not really they all retarded
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shazam, spiritofamermaid and AmateurComedicTaxidermist
Hexadecimal said:
The court first holds that the parents are likely to succeed on their claim that the policy of not allowing opt-outs unconstitutionally burdens their exercise of their religion.
“we have long recognized," Alito writes, "the rights of parents to direct 'the religious upbringing' of their children. And we have held that those rights are violated by government policies that substantially interfere with the religious development of children."
Click to expand...
I feel like there is going to be a lot of knock-on effects from this. Parents practicing faith-healing can opt their kids out of health class? Flat earthers can opt their kids out of geography? This is going to raise a lot more questions than it answers.

Being gay isn't specifically banned in the USA. If Muslims can't handle that, maybe they'd be better off in another country? I would posit that Islam is fundamentally incompatible with a modern, liberal society.
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Enward Cullen, Stardust_Ziggy and 13 others
Diana Moon Glampers said:
Rape actually is a social construct. Unlike violence, which obviously and clearly existed all the way back in the animal kingdom, rape's unpleasantness has spiked as we've developed other social constructs like "dignity," "freedom of choice," "romance," "love," and "consent." Before those constructs, it's just how the deed was done, sometimes it was more pleasant than others but it wasn't some great wrong if it was unpleasant, just an unfortunate fact of life.

Sure, drakes "rape" female ducks, but it's just violent copulation. There's no intent behind it. It's only rape once someone intends to do something in violation of the other person's desires.
Click to expand...
You know, Diana? This is your weirdest pill yet but by golly it's making sense! I don't think the victims will appreciate or listen to the logic behind it and I believe that, ultimately, is what I was trying to get at. It's unfortunate, and I just think it's in really poor taste for the dumbfuck pajeet to be so dismissive of violent crimes that we as people have dictated to be real enough to punish someone for. Speaking of violent crimes.

Uh oh, Democrats! Did your pet browns you've been importing enmasse show how they aren't compatible with your very Western-minded faggot propaganda?


Get social constructed you stupid pricks!
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: YarrBlueballs, spiritofamermaid, duckbutter&toejamsandwich and 4 others
biglurker said:
Holy Shit there is a major gayop over the BBB going on. A lot of "WE SHOULD HAVE EXPECTED TO GET FUCKED IN THE ASS AND DO NOTHING" faggotry on social media out of nowhere.
I'd honestly be surprised if Trump, Congress, and the few senators with spines would just take what an unelected official says up the ass.
Anything someone living under a (D)ick senator can do besides bitching at Thune and Vance?
Click to expand...
Urge Vance to take a more active role in pushing Trump's domestic Agenda by whipping those niggers in the Senate. I want Vance to buck break the Senate into line with the MAGA agenda the way Trump has with the executive branch. (And I want Lisa and Grug asking for more)
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, AmateurComedicTaxidermist, duckbutter&toejamsandwich and 5 others
The Wall of Ambition said:
I assume someone has already posted this but I want to give a shout out to Pew Research Center for publishing that Trump almost won Hispanics in 2024. I've been reading Reddit threads about it and the mald is legendary.

View attachment 7565812

Reddit is a website full of bots and white women with savior complexes. It's only good for a laugh.

I think there might not be a demographic in this country I love more than legal Hispanic immigrants. The ones I've met have all been based. Wish they'd spend more time learning English, though.
Click to expand...
If youre here for 35 years and didnt get business taken care of, then gtfo. You had all that time and did fuck all? Get deported. This is a common talking point amongst legal hispanics, they have no sympathy for spics who cant handle the bare minimum.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, AmateurComedicTaxidermist, WanderingWalker and 6 others
Space Faring Marsupial said:
Presumptuous of you to say actual women are on Reddit.
Click to expand...
You'd be surprised. I've been on Reddit since around 2014 and it has slowly stopped being a sausage party. This is assuming that every user with a female avatar is a woman. Nowadays you have celebrity gossip subs like r/fauxmoi and the snark subs, which are female-dominated phenomemons. I'd say maybe 30% of the users on the site are women. You can kind of just tell when you're reading the words of a woman because they have this specific way of typing and they make the same dumbass arguments. Like how blacks have "AAVE" white women online have their own retard-speak.

Of course I also see a fuck-ton of troons who think they're women, sometimes more often than actual women. Interestingly, there is a small cartel of female moderators who moderate a large number of subs, which is why all the top subs tend to push the same narratives. They're moderated by the same people. The hacker forums have looked into this. Honestly, I could write an essay on all the niche shit I know about Reddit and how it works, but I'd rather put a bullet in my head. Sorry for the off-topic.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Davis and 5 others
Hexadecimal said:
gay nigga story time case
6-3 Alito writing libcucks dissenting



The court first holds that the parents are likely to succeed on their claim that the policy of not allowing opt-outs unconstitutionally burdens their exercise of their religion.
“we have long recognized," Alito writes, "the rights of parents to direct 'the religious upbringing' of their children. And we have held that those rights are violated by government policies that substantially interfere with the religious development of children."

Sotomayor: The reverberations of the Court’s error will be felt, I fear,for generations. Unable to condone that grave misjudgment, I dissent.
Click to expand...
The usual faggots are taking it as well as anyone would expect.
1751049666786.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shazam, Smar Mijou, Chadikus Maximus and 12 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back