- Joined
- Nov 22, 2024
I've heard this talking point and I don't think it's quite correct. It's something the US forces as a whole came up as an excuse for their failures.The fundamental problem with green berets is that their role is dependent on local brownoids being able to learn and be courageous which is a very risky thing to bet on.
If you heard what people in Afghanistan said about the ANA or the ANP was that it was composed mostly of the village rejects and fuck ups who were kicked out, and the US was able to get them into uniform with money. So the strategy was "Go to a country, destroy their central Government, and then pay the people who are traitors/mafia/drug addicts/chomos to make a mercenary group to make as a local Army (usually with drug money)." Same thing happened with the Contras.
So if you imagine some invading force destroying all US institutions and replacing them with the prison population as the "New US Army/Police", of course you are going to have issues with performance. The problem is the strategy in the forever wars, not the inherent abilities of the population.
The enemies of the US are usually much more sophisticated than what the local propaganda gives them credit despite their technological inferiority. Think of the Vietcong as another example. Sandal rice farmers in black pajamas digging tunnels survived some of the heaviest bombardments known to man, and won the war.
Seth Harp for some reason changed his PFP on X. I don't know why, tbh. Liked the first one more personally. He looks like he's in pain while smiling.


Also reposting.

Beating toddlers to death, huh... well, I would not be smiling a lot neither if I had to report on this daily.
Last edited: