US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
gay nigga story time case
6-3 Alito writing libcucks dissenting



The court first holds that the parents are likely to succeed on their claim that the policy of not allowing opt-outs unconstitutionally burdens their exercise of their religion.
“we have long recognized," Alito writes, "the rights of parents to direct 'the religious upbringing' of their children. And we have held that those rights are violated by government policies that substantially interfere with the religious development of children."

Sotomayor: The reverberations of the Court’s error will be felt, I fear,for generations. Unable to condone that grave misjudgment, I dissent.
Wellp, something very american happened.
 
It's a group problem, you nigs don't mind being "homophobic" either usually. It's basically a White thing.
1751119493153.webp

I'm shocked it took this long but with religious freedom influencing the SCOTUS's decision. Not so shocked that it took Muslims, not Christians, for the LGBTQ+ ideology to buckle down from their own woke religion. So, brown people don't have to comply, but the white people do under the state. Interesting.
 
View attachment 7569677

I'm shocked it took this long but with religious freedom influencing the SCOTUS's decision. Not so shocked that it took Muslims, not Christians, for the LGBTQ+ ideology to buckle down from their own woke religion. So, brown people don't have to comply, but the white people do under the state. Interesting.
I believe the use of Muslims is tactical. Especially consider when these suits were filed—it was a different time, culturally speaking. TPTB can't pull out their tried and true tools of calling people evil racist Nazi Christo-facscists when their opponents are poor oppressed Muslims. This happens all the time when law and politics intersect. You want the most tactically advantageous plaintiff relative to the defendant, and for these areas of the country that means Muslims.
 
I'm shocked it took this long but with religious freedom influencing the SCOTUS's decision. Not so shocked that it took Muslims, not Christians, for the LGBTQ+ ideology to buckle down from their own woke religion. So, brown people don't have to comply, but the white people do under the state. Interesting.
This would be the perfect time for non-white Christians to start screaming the house down over wokeshit in schools and dare anyone to stop them.
 
You said it here yourself that it's an act of violence. Violence isn't a 'social construct' unless you're willing to say that violence is just an act with no intent behind it.

And it's not 'just how the deed is done', it's unnatural. Even in your example of ducks, this can be seen as female ducks have defenses against valid mates in the construction of their vaginas, with many labyrinthine dead-ends and false chambers to mitigate the risk of impregnation by a rapist. Even female ducks do not accept it as a valid means of reproduction in their very biology.

I only feel the need to say this, because this mindset and this logic are caustic to society and erroneous. Even in nature some things that are 'natural' or the 'normal' way of things on the surface are abberant. Which is one of a cohort of reasons to never compare humans to other animals in any respect. Humans are not ducks. The concepts of 'dignity', 'freedom of choice', 'romance', 'love', and 'consent' are all valid as they are observably integral aspects of healthy human societies since antiquity. These are concepts that should not be cheapened nor tossed as, although some may mock the idea, they are critical to what a human society needs to operate in a healthy manner.

Yes, you have the right of it: violence is NOT a social construct. But rape is.

This is the most unhinged thing I have read on this site in a while.

I have literally seen this exact defense from convicted rapists.

It's not a defense. I also called love and dignity social constructs.

Social constructs are literally all that keep us from the animals.

You've bought the leftist lie that "social constructs" mean "fuck it, it's not important." All the most important concepts and ideas are social constructs.

Without social constructs, all we have is eat or be eaten natural selection, violent ends and pain.

Maybe the biggest insanity of leftists is that they want to call everything that separates us and elevates us above the animals, something that is unimportant.

Justice is a social construct. Politics is a social construct. Murder is a social construct, too, even though violence isn't. You can't have justice without the idea that there are "wrong" and "right" things to do, but that's ALL a social construct.

Everything that differentiates your life from a spider monkey is a social construct. And the leftists want to pretend this means "so it doesn't matter, and can be changed any way you want." That's farcical. The issue here is that even people HERE apparently now believe the insane pomo lie of "if it's a social construct, that means it's infinitely changeable and inconsequential."
 
I don't think Québec is further left than the rest of Canada. If it is, all the Québécois with Confederate flags on their trucks are even more confused than I thought they were.
They are both further left and further right than the rest of Canada. It’s because their Overton window is much wider then Anglo Canada.
 
I found a new cope and sneed reddit, "r/IsItIllegal".

1751120250398.webp

1751120278554.webp

It's mostly a bunch of redditors asking legal advice questions ("Is it legal for my parents to make me go to church!?" "My parents won't let me spend money on pot, can I sue?!?!") but as of late they've been getting some banger threads bitching about the eeeeeevil ICE throwing wetbacks out of the country without permission of a part time traffic court judge in Canada.
 
A lot of evidence shows compassion is also part of natural selection.

You don’t need social constructs for us to either have developed compassion on a biological basis or be endowed with it by god.

I think the morality behind the constructs came first not the opposite, but no one will ever really know

Maybe. But why is it somehow negative to identify something as a social construct? This is where even the people in this thread who should know better are going insane and inherently adopting leftist talking points.

Something being a social construct doesn't make it meaningless, unimportant, or worth eliminating as a concept.

It just means it's something only humans in a social group could come up with. It means it's something separating us from the animals.

Leftists fundamentally think we're equal to the animals, that our lives aren't worth more than theirs (possibly less!), and that anything "socially constructed" is tainted by our original sins of racism, sexism, and colonialism. They want us to consider anything inherent to our humanity to be up for debate and alteration. They act like anything socially constructed is alienating us from our true, animal selves. That's a disgusting point of view. But whenever we act like something being only achievable by humans (which is all that "social construct" actually means, if you boil it down) means it's meaningless and infinitely alterable, we are buying into the biggest and boldest lie of the postmodernists.
 
I believe the use of Muslims is tactical. Especially consider when these suits were filed—it was a different time, culturally speaking. TPTB can't pull out their tried and true tools of calling people evil racist Nazi Christo-facscists when their opponents are poor oppressed Muslims. This happens all the time when law and politics intersect. You want the most tactically advantageous plaintiff relative to the defendant, and for these areas of the country that means Muslims.
I think of leftists as that neo-Nazi from American History X. As Malcolm X pointed out, they are like wolves in lamb's clothes. Their interests are self-serving, using the minority as tactical deployment for their agendas. Once they deflect, it's like the minority does not exist in their eyes. Or, they become unawarely racist like a caricature. I'll end with this: knowledge is power.
 
Maybe. But why is it somehow negative to identify something as a social construct? This is where even the people in this thread who should know better are going insane and inherently adopting leftist talking points.

Something being a social construct doesn't make it meaningless, unimportant, or worth eliminating as a concept.

It just means it's something only humans in a social group could come up with. It means it's something separating us from the animals.

Leftists fundamentally think we're equal to the animals, that our lives aren't worth more than theirs (possibly less!), and that anything "socially constructed" is tainted by our original sins of racism, sexism, and colonialism. They want us to consider anything inherent to our humanity to be up for debate and alteration.
I totally agree I’m just saying it’s not just as simple as

Social construct = humanity

natural selection = barbarism

It’s very complex

I don’t think social constructs are bad but it’s dangerous to rely on them because they can be deconstructed so easily. There needs to be a reasoning behind moral instruction we can’t just go, erm just because I said so okay!
 
This user is a retard. Disregard this post.
Based on experience having worked with kids
Daily reminder that women need to be banned from this website because does anyone really expect anything after these words to make sense? Sure, some of what she says might make sense but you'd be reading text written by a woman. I bet if you thought more about the gender of the poster you'd be more pissed about reading text written by a woman. Ban these fucking whores from this site before it becomes like reddit. You let these women in, you let them be moderators, look at what they've done in places of work, you want that to what might be one of the last internet forum freedoms we have to be closed down because you've let women run their mouths? i fucking warn you faggots, i don't give a fuck who you are, white or black, in my view you are all scum if you allow women into power and you are my enemy and i will do everything i can to fuck you over you fucking simps. What the fuck is up with such obvious, like we're still climbing the fucking DEI is leaking into everything. they fucked up games, they fucked up digg and reddit, and now they're gonna come after this site as well. why not enforce trust hierarchy at least so you can cut off entire branch of users? just don't get it, you faggots like reading text written by women? what about womens voice? their voice is as annoying as their text. i think a lot of you are just blind or 12 and can't tell text written by a women, you read it neutrally but you'd...

let me just say this, if this site offered to hide all text written by a woman, all men would turn that on. it's just a fucking waste of everyones time especially considering they're gonna lose rights in 20 years tops anyway, why waste time on listening to their opinions?

if women say that kids can't type, and women have a firm grip on education, then why are we listening to the people who complain about things they've fucked up anyway?

ban women from this site or you'll get your freedoms back.

whores
 
Yes, you have the right of it: violence is NOT a social construct. But rape is.
Currency is a social construct. Taxation is arguably a social construct.

Saying 'rape is a social construct' is devoid of reason.
Social constructs are literally all that keep us from the animals.

You've bought the leftist lie that "social constructs" mean "fuck it, it's not important." All the most important concepts and ideas are social constructs.

Without social constructs, all we have is eat or be eaten natural selection, violent ends and pain.

Maybe the biggest insanity of leftists is that they want to call everything that separates us and elevates us above the animals, something that is unimportant.

Justice is a social construct. Politics is a social construct. Murder is a social construct, too, even though violence isn't. You can't have justice without the idea that there are "wrong" and "right" things to do, but that's ALL a social construct.

Everything that differentiates your life from a spider monkey is a social construct. And the leftists want to pretend this means "so it doesn't matter, and can be changed any way you want." That's farcical. The issue here is that even people HERE apparently now believe the insane pomo lie of "if it's a social construct, that means it's infinitely changeable and inconsequential."
Understand this is the exact navel-gazing rhetoric that gets people to staunchly deny that evolution even exists.

Because a certain class of person doesn't understand the difference between that which is rooted in human biology, which does to a limited extent involve things such as 'dignity' and 'anguish', and things that are socially constructed. Rape is not a social construct, I have already explained as to why.

The stark, unmediated difference between a social construct and what isn't, is as I stated:
The concepts of 'dignity', 'freedom of choice', 'romance', 'love', and 'consent' are all valid as they are observably integral aspects of healthy human societies since antiquity.
what you are doing is conflating 'things we understand' with 'things we construct' which is asinine. Gravity is not a social construct. Electromagnetism is not a social construct. Rape as well, is not a social construct simply because it has laws and punishments that are arbitrary ranging from a slap on the wrist (comparatively) to summary execution.

You genuinely, and I'm trying not to be too abrasive here, need to sit and think in a dark room for a while on what does and does not constitute a construction of the human mind vs what is simply an observed aspect of human biology/sociology. This is no different in function than saying 'gender is a social construct' and somehow is even more abhorrent.

And as with rape if you are looking for - for some hideous and destructive reason - examples in the animal kingdom, you can find examples of 'dignity', 'love', 'freedom of choice' in various species other than man.
 
Last edited:
I believe the use of Muslims is tactical. Especially consider when these suits were filed—it was a different time, culturally speaking. TPTB can't pull out their tried and true tools of calling people evil racist Nazi Christo-facscists when their opponents are poor oppressed Muslims. This happens all the time when law and politics intersect. You want the most tactically advantageous plaintiff relative to the defendant, and for these areas of the country that means Muslims.
Muslims were used for the gay book case for the same reason why Asians were used for the Affirmative-Action case despite the extreme amount of Asian nepotism in the tech industry and universities giving Asians plenty of quota while reducing the White quota to near zero excluding legacies.

It's not within the Overton Window to say that White people or Christians are discriminated against.
 
ban women from this site or you'll get your freedoms back.

Cool idea! You should make your OWN free speech website just like that! It'll be easy and fun and profitable. You'll love your life every day after you just get rid of those pesky vagina people. They're why you can't have any fun. They're why that one bad thing happened to you. And that other thing. We know. That's why you should just start your own site, where you can make the rules and decide exactly who's allowed and who isn't.

1751121610251.webp
 
if women say that kids can't type, and women have a firm grip on education, then why are we listening to the people who complain about things they've fucked up anyway?
Buddy, I don't have a firm grip on reality, let alone an entire industry. One, you don't know that I'm a woman. Two (more importantly), I didn't even say I was working with kids in education. I said I've worked with kids and that, in my experience, they have poor computer literacy on average. What got you worked up about this?
 
Back