US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Uh, no, most are well aware we have no relationship to the cows and we don't want one.
The key word was "parasocial."

men, how do you feel about yourself not knowing if this place still has any men left?
Agree with the other poster, go buy a server and a XenForo account and make your own super cool forum that's only for men and requires you to photograph yourself physically holding up your cock and a piece of paper with today's date on it to join. There's nothing stopping you.

Yes, I perfectly understood you and responded flawlessly.
Alright. I know how I feel about this but I'm not trying to tell you how to feel about it.
 
Muslims were used for the gay book case for the same reason why Asians were used for the Affirmative-Action case despite the extreme amount of Asian nepotism in the tech industry and universities giving Asians plenty of quota while reducing the White quota to near zero excluding legacies.

It's not within the Overton Window to say that White people or Christians are discriminated against.
Then why did they use a straight white woman for the recent discrimination case?
 
That
No. Technically speaking white people don't have to comply either. But they'll use social pressure and conditioning from that angle, something that absolutely doesn't work against Muslims (and is slowly failing to work on Whites).
That's my point. When I say "comply," I'm speaking in terms of social acceptance WITH conducting yourself appropriately with modern society. This will sound racist as shit, but from observation, White people are most likely to comply with society's laws and practices, as in if they need to protest or organize, they would be most likely to go about it as legally and peacefully. PTA meetings, town hall meetings, social media groups.

Contrast that with non-White majorities, officially or not, that tend to initiate aggression and incite violence within group settings. There are reasons for that, henceforth the many race riots in the US from yesteryear, but that rationalization falls straight out the window when A) several government organizations allow them to operate with impunity, B) they would be expected, under the notion of equity/equality to conduct them accordingly.

Imagine White Christians taking LGBTQ+ people, gagging them, and throwing them off roofs. It would be an international instance. Meanwhile, there are stories of such in the Eastern world that make headlines. Or, there are Black people that outright beat up, even KILL LGBTQ+ because somebody wanted a fling but was misinformed of their sex. Or even better, the liberal usage of "faggot" in rap music without a peep from anybody.
 
us-politics-general + women, should be the title of this thread, only women would compain about my gramar, men know what i meant and can mentally fill in the gaps, but a woman always has to open her fucking mouth and complain.

men, how do you feel about yourself not knowing if this place still has any men left?
Lmao here for a year and all you do is whine about women. I bet you're threadbanned from multiple Beauty Parlor threads.
 
The only men who complain about women (on the internet no less) are the ones bitter they never get any pussy. There I said it.
That's an embarrassing thing to say because it reveals that you think women are beyond complaint, which obviously isn't true, they're flawed human beings like everyone else. You're what's called a simp. But don't you think we should get on topic?
 
Buddy, I don't have a firm grip on reality, let alone an entire industry. One, you don't know that I'm a woman. Two (more importantly), I didn't even say I was working with kids in education. I said I've worked with kids and that, in my experience, they have poor computer literacy on average. What got you worked up about this?
If you're not a woman you sure type like a woman. Typing like a sassy black woman tbh.
 
I see you’ve never been to a boomer forum and heard them talk about their wives.
That's different. At least those boomers were socially adjusted enough to attract a mate and enter into an relationship and marriage. Most internet incels who complain about women being on the internet are just plain weirdos and probably should be medicated to prevent mass shootings.
 
Muslims were used for the gay book case for the same reason why Asians were used for the Affirmative-Action case despite the extreme amount of Asian nepotism in the tech industry and universities giving Asians plenty of quota while reducing the White quota to near zero excluding legacies.

It's not within the Overton Window to say that White people or Christians are discriminated against.
Remember the Overton Window is "acceptable to say but batshit" to normal to "acceptable to say but batshit on the other side". I've always felt that "you can't be racist against white people" was "acceptable to say but batshit" to actual fringe leftist beliefs. Normal people will certainly pause a bit when hearing that theory and think it's kind of "out there." Leftists, of course, have a different window, but Joe Normie on the street? They've done studies on this and outside of 1. leftists and 2. blacks no one buys that bullshit.

Now consider that as part of the left slowly losing the culture war and losing their ability to social engineer -- to intentionally fuck with the overton window -- all those "acceptable to say but batshit" things are going to become fringe beliefs that aren't acceptable to say anymore. Still better, a LOOOOOT of conservative beliefs are currently unacceptable, cancelable beliefs to state you have becuase of the specific way the left has engineered the Overton window over the past 30 years or so. We're already seeing this with the growing pushback against troons and faggots and other degenerates.

I've gone into this before and someone on Twitter had a much better way of explaining it, but the long and the short of it is there are always going to be "batshit insane, out there, completely unhinged" beliefs on the left and right. Barring some sort of massive cultural shift that will leave us with a society none of us recognize, white supremacy / white nationalism will never be an acceptable belief to express to normies, nor will normies support pedophilia or the removal of property rights. These things will always be outside of the Overton Window. They are anchor points, in other words. By pretending everything to the right of Mao was "nazi adjacent" -- by tying beliefs such as nationalism to the anchor -- they're pulled outside the window.

Now the neat trick here if you're a batshit insane leftist is this doesn't just shrink the window. It actually makes fringe lefty beliefs -- "you can't be racist against white people" or "you can't arrest criminals if they're black because that's racist" -- slide into the window from the other side. It slides the window, it doesn't shrink it.

By pulling this game where you make the right's beliefs completely verboten to even talk about, yet alone profess a belief in, you make your batshit leftist friend's beliefs acceptable.
 
If you identify a thing as a "social construct," what new understanding do you have of the thing? How is it changed? "Well, you see, it's not given by nature." You can say that about anything. Words for things aren't precisely the things. Words are the wrong words, or forgotten, or reused, subsumed into jargons, customarily misspoken, or whatever. So?

"Race is a social construct," says some nigger, acting white. What does he know? What do we learn from what he says? Are we allowed to answer?

The social reason people call something a "social construct" is to discredit or illegitimize the thing and some people who talk about it, to exclude it and some people from consideration or discussion, to eject it from reality and some people from society, etc., under certain specific, hypocritical, irrational, otherwise-determined terms set by the sayers of "social construct"—by whoever says it first, like "You're it."

Why join this game? What can we win?
 
The only men who complain about women (on the internet no less) are the ones bitter they never get any pussy. There I said it.
My grandmother hated women, my mother hates women, my wife hates women.
I come from a long line of women haters and I will not have you besmirch my heritage with falsities.
 
That's an embarrassing thing to say because it reveals that you think women are beyond complaint, which obviously isn't true, they're flawed human beings like everyone else. You're what's called a simp. But don't you think we should get on topic?

Bro, that's a funny thing for you to say because it reveals something different...

You're not use to women conforming to whatever you say. Because they don't listen to you. Because they don't respect you...which is why they don't give you pussy.

Like, my wife doesn't acktually like football. She knows it. I know it. She says the stupidest things about football and I mock her when she says them. But why would I ever complain about "women" let alone about how this woman wants to show me she's always on my side by annoying me when I just want to watch the game and get drunk???
 
My grandmother hated women, my mother hates women, my wife hates women.
I come from a long line of women haters and I will not have you besmirch my heritage with falsities.

Oh yes, well, that's fair. Women hate other women and bitch eternally about them. Which means if you're bitching about them...you're a woman. QEFUCKINGD.
 
Back