Just give up man, this thread has just become a pro-Ethan circlejerk, it's pointless to actually try and say anything critical of him or this situation without a torrent of people going "Based Jew BTFOing commies!" and calling you a faggot for taking a step back and looking at the bigger picture.
Buddy, it's ok to root for people who suck sometimes.
That Ethan was 100% on board with (and still is) so long as those tactics aren't used to criticize Israel.
I think you are confusing people cheering Ethan fucking the Hasan grifo-verse with liking Ethan.
I feel like I'm being gaslit when people tell me this when there's dozens of pages that are soley "Wow I used to hate Ethan but he's really redeemed himself by going after these commies"
Because your confusing people cheering on Ethan's lawsuit as people cheering for Ethan in general
Things will calm down a bit after the feature expires. You're not going to win over the people who unironically like Ethan Klein. The main thing is to keep archiving and documenting.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about, this has been going on way before Ethan's copyright suit, hell even way before the Hasan content Nuke. Ethan throws Keffals and Vaush under the bus for Loli YEARS after it was known the latter was a pedo freak, and all of a sudden the "Wow Ethan Redemption arc?!" conversation began, this is just a culmination of people mistaking his self-serving behavior with moral fiber.
Since when did we had a roaches in this board?
You're the one who came up with the imaginary animal torture scenario.
Copyright laws are already too fucking extreme (can't play five seconds of a song or film in videos) and this rotten kike has enough money already.
I'll judge the Merits of the suit. I am a known lawyer.
If she watches a video of someone saying "Ethan Klein abuses his children", offers 0 pushback against what the video is saying or against her chat saying someone should call CPS, make horrified faces throughout it, and say "yeah, it makes sense" then yes, I would say that she is implicitly supporting that.
Did you even watch the clip you posted? He just explicitly says that she did not make a direct call to action, not that she did not implicitly support it(by doing whats stated above).
It helped for Sargon that his use wasn't just clearly fair use but "get the fuck out of here" fair use enough to be sanctionable.
I was aware of this when I made my post, and the thing here is, that's is worst for Ethan. The copyright statute almost by design gives immense lenience to a judge to throw out the suit. Firstly because they can weight in these factors in the way they'd like on a "case by case" basis which ignores precedent, meaning, they could look at one of these criteria's, such as "the nature of the copyrighted work", and say, "it is so egregious that the plaintiff made a social critique video and called for people to reply to him only to file a lawsuit, that the nature of the work does not allow for copyright protection regardless of the other factors".
I'm not even going to disagree with you because on the whole, you're right. Ethan doesn't get a pass on his previous retardations or moral failings just because he's currently fighting with people who are worse than himself, or at least he doesn't get the pass from me.
This is stupid Karen bs though. Ethan himself said worrying things about the state of his kids, so no, one is obligated to say one thing or the other.
