Science Google just bought 200 megawatts of fusion energy that doesn’t even exist yet


By Ella Nilsen, CNN
Mon June 30, 2025

april-10-2025-cfs-68.webp
A person works on the cryostat base of the fusion reactor inside the tokamak hall at Commonwealth Fusion Systems in Devens, Massachusetts, on April 10. A full-sized image of the tokamak is superimposed onto the wall.

Tech giant Google is investing money into a futuristic nuclear fusion plant that hasn’t been built yet but someday will replicate the energy of the stars. It’s a sign of how hungry big tech companies are for a virtually unlimited source of clean power that is still years away.

Google and Massachusetts-based Commonwealth Fusion Systems announced a deal Monday in which the tech company bought 200 megawatts of power from Commonwealth’s first commercial fusion plant, the same amount of energy that could power roughly 200,000 average American homes.

Commonwealth aims to build the plant in Virginia by the early 2030s. When it starts generating usable fusion energy is still TBD, though the company believes they can do it in the same timeframe.

Google is also investing a second round of money into Commonwealth to spur development of its demonstration tokamak — a donut-shaped machine that uses massive magnets and molten plasma to force two atoms to merge, thereby creating the energy of the sun.

Google and Commonwealth did not disclose how much money is being invested, but both touted the announcement as a major step toward fusion commercialization.

“We’re using this purchasing power that we have to send a demand signal to the market for fusion energy and hopefully move (the) technology forward,” said Michael Terrell, senior director of energy and climate at Google.

Commonwealth is currently building its demonstration plant in Massachusetts, known as SPARC. It’s the tokamak the company says could forever change where the world gets its power from, generating 10 million times more energy than coal or natural gas while producing no planet-warming pollution. Fuel for fusion is abundant, derived from a form of hydrogen found in seawater and tritium extracted from lithium. And unlike nuclear fission, there is no radioactive waste involved.

april-10-2025-cfs-445.webp
Commonwealth Fusion Systems in Devens, Mass. on April 10, 2025.

The big challenge is that no one has yet built a machine powerful and precise enough to get more energy out of the reaction than they put into it.

Still, fusion is especially appealing to big tech companies like Google because it delivers a steady supply of baseload electricity for power-hungry data centers and AI. Google has also invested in geothermal energy and small nuclear reactor projects, which can also provide baseload power with no carbon emissions.

Commonwealth CEO Bob Mumgaard called the agreement the “largest offtake agreement for fusion” and said Google’s funding investment would allow his company to take necessary research and development steps to work towards developing its commercial fusion plant in Virginia at the same time it finishes its demonstration plant in Massachusetts and starts working towards ignition there.

“It’s hard to say exactly how much it accelerates it, but it definitely puts it in a category where now we can start to work more and more on ARC (the future Virginia plant) while we finish SPARC, instead of doing them very sequentially,” Mumgaard said.
 
>announces an investment in future tech
>doesn’t disclose the amount

Interesting, we sure this isn’t some kind of shenanigans hiding behind the facade of ‘fusion’?
Also it’s totally gonna be this fusion
IMG_3726.gif
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3726.gif
    IMG_3726.gif
    3 MB · Views: 3
  • Like
Reactions: Toolbox
I wonder if this will turn out to be like pre-ordering Duke Nukem Forever in 1997 and the entire landscape of whatever you pre-ordered will have completely changed by the time it comes out.
Sounds optimistic if the landscape will have changed at all beyond a mix of natural gas, fission (no thorium), beautiful clean coal, and renewables. We should skip fusion and use alien technology.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: obsdj
Now how can the commonfolk pre-order electricity when prices are lower before the energy companies jack them up again?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: SCV and Marvin
>muh it will be available in ten years
You guys know that annually more money is wasted on trannies than invested in the research of commercial fusion power, right?
If you add up medical care for fatties, welfare, gibs to third world countries etc, how much larger is the combined money pit than what's realistically invested in hard science R&D that can actually lead somewhere? I'm not sure I want to know how bad things really are.
 
If you add up medical care for fatties, welfare, gibs to third world countries etc, how much larger is the combined money pit than what's realistically invested in hard science R&D that can actually lead somewhere? I'm not sure I want to know how bad things really are.
Tangible improvements of our daily lives isn't what the people in charge want. Unless a scientific advancement or engineering solution produces a tool with which to make your life more miserable, they're not interested in it.
Why not invest on fission nuclear reactors that already exist and can be built right now? Fags.
Leftoid retards have ruined that. Twice. First with Chernobyl and in more recent times with "fission power is evil and nazi, because of Chernobyl". Aside from that, the elites don't want you, the peasent, to have access to cheap energy, fission or fusion doesn't matter. So, we will never have gigawatt tokamaks. But we won't get thorium 232 reactors either, because fuck having cheap electricity and shit.
 
Why not invest on fission nuclear reactors that already exist and can be built right now? Fags.
Once everyone born before 1980 is dead we can have fission power. It's being held back by retards who immediately think of Chernobyl every time nuclear power is mentioned, despite that disaster being an indictment on communism more than anything else.

It doesn't help that they hyped the ever loving shit out of the Fukushima meltdown back in 2011 even though only one person died from cancer that was maybe possibly perhaps caused by radiation. Brought all the geezers right back to 1986.
 
That would benefit the common people, that’s why. We are nowhere near fusion reactor capability, let alone mastering fission. This smells of a money laundering scheme to me than an unrealistic utopian investment.
Not necessarily. In the past years, there have been some quite substantial investments into the field, and not only into the more well understood concepts (tokamaks/magnetic confinement, inertial confinement), but also more obscure things (z pinch). I think the last time that happened was in the 1970s as a result of the oil crisis, since virtually all fusion reactor designs now discussed or used for experiments come from the 1950-1980 timeframe. Even stuff like ITER comes from that time.

Anyway, kill all boomers, deport all brown pets and ban leftoid ideologies and we maybe can have fission and fusion power.
 
I like money being spent on cool shit and this is cool shit. Additionally if it doesn't work Google(Satan) is the one losing money so that's a win win in my books.
 
Fusion would be nice to pour money into. It's technically possible, it's just terribly underfunded for the massive technical undertaking involved.

Hell with usable fusion reactors, we would be so flush with cheap energy, we could probably run Direct Air Capture systems, slurp CO2 right out of the air and make synthetic hydrocarbons, and run existing gasoline infrastructure on it.

This is the thing, all the clean energy dipshits want us to pare back our use of fossil fuels except they aren't leaving us any alternatives. They are usually anti-nuclear. A few solar panels and some windmills can't power the US.

Sometimes I think they just expect millions of Americans to go back to the stone age.

This is the thing, a massive glut of cheap energy drove economic advancement in this country for generations. You could reliably trust that your kids would have a better life than you did, and a big part of that was due to economic growth driven by cheap energy.

These hippies would be lucky if all the public does is ignore them and burn fossil fuels anyway. Because if the public properly listened to the green energy hippies, they'd tear them limb from limb in the street for fucking with their quality of life.
 
Back