Kayla Rekieta is another humanoid rat grifter so as long as Rekieta can provide cash and a house she will stay. The moment he is cracked open and the last of the cash is scooped out she will probably kick him out of the house pending divorce finalization and it will roll down hill from there.
The day after the TRO was granted Nick went on to make a 4 hour livestream talking almost exclusively about Aaron. That seems like an extremely clear violation.
Tbh if you get a restraining order to the point someone can't mention you on their gossip show then you shouldn't be able to mention them either.
I like to think Nick is just retarded and doesn't know how the @ mentions work and most people are tagging Aaron in tweets to Nick on purpose to fuck with him more.
It just occurred to me that Mama K, considering she lives nearby, PLUS Keanu and Elissa could file HROs against Nick (I'm not sure how that works across state lines). Hasn't he made death threats to all? Now that would be hilarious. Let the games begin and may the odds be ever in your favor.
"Geno is retarded and he thinks the revenge porn lawsuit[sic] was you trying to get even with aaron."
They found 25 grams, just short of a single ounce.
I would hate him too if he fucked my dad so hard that he thinks more about him more than me or my mom.
Ftfy, come on man it was right there.
Can't speak for Elissa or Mama K but other local women looked into getting a HRO against Rekieta but because it would mean he would have their address they gave up on the idea. They're terrified of Rekieta and of his family's money. And one of the women is quite an aggressive lesbian who would normally stand up against anyone particularly a man. When we laugh at Rekieta being such a weak faggot it's worth remembering not everyone feels that way, especially women who've met him or suffered his attempts to persuade them or have sex with them.
I was there for that too, and while it wasn't overly convincing an act, it didn't have to be: Nick was thirsty for it, and so he bought it. There was no "trolling gayops" about anything whatsoever. It was a guy sending girl pics. He didn't even try to chat like a woman. The funniest thing is that Nick went for it :-) Maybe Nick just senses the Adam's Apple under the pancake makeup and is overpowered by it.
Whoever is doing this: Just make snarky comments every thirty seconds. Instantly transformative. Problem solved.
You mean it should say “former slam piece”.
No but apparently April thumbs Nick’s ass. Aaron ‘jokes’ as much and when Nick was responding to him, he just gave a nervous chuckle.
DENIED.
I think the next box ticked listed as (b) makes clear that your interpretation is correct as to what else was DENIED and the portion after "including..." is just listing out some examples of direct or indirect contact.The form order fucking sucks in terms of draftmanship, and I don't blame anyone for being confused. I, too, am confused.
This section, to me, reads like the unchecked box in (a) means that the order does not extend to petitioner's minor children or person subject to guardianship. In other words, the third check-box will only be marked if the order extends to minor children or a person subject to guardianship.
The Harman Smith guy does give transformative commentary over the top of the Locals streams, or at least he did.
Good notice, I am too prone to huffing hopium.
I'm not sure that's enough. It might be! I'm just not sure of it. Mindset made a video yesterday about H3H3's lawsuit vs Denims, where H3H3 includes their own copyright law established from their 2016 case, and in that discussion Mindset says he tends to double the length of a video--at least--with his commentary so that it's transformative beyond question. In fact the thrust of H3H3 v Denims is that her minimum amount of commentary was aimed at attacking his profitability.
