Why would libertarians run for a government position like the presidency if they are opposed of big government?
Yeah I’m sure the GOP would break over infinite taxes and infinite Indians (maybe Indians)
It's not about the issues, just the money.
Who cares about saying nigger when the faggot only cares about his own profits and importing infinity pajeets. Just because someone is helpful for a moment doesn't mean I'm going to forget what their true agenda is.
Lolberts are too busy debating on what age of child is okay to molest and marrying ugly asians.
I dont know that I hate him, for all his faults he did use his money to do SOME cool things that are pushing the boundaries of human advancement. That said he's quickly worn out his welcome.
Evidently, a few amount of people. You tell me. What's more important: freedom of speech or overall integrity?
Owens needs to take her medicine. There's no way that macron refused to do a Ukraine peace deal bc Candace kept calling his wife a tranny. There's also no way Trump offered to be on her show but she turned him down
I've been wondering my YT feed has been so clotted with car faggots driving them around and wumao infested comment sections despite the fact that i never watch videos about cars.
The fact that so many people on both sides of the aisle simped for a fucking billionaire just because he said the correct things is an excellent case study in NPC behavior.
Removing the EV incentives gives Tesla a huge leg up because they are the only company that are able to make electric cars while still remaining profitable. Every other Western company has not been able to do that, each car sold is a net loss for them
I personally don’t hate him. I think he is just autistic as fuck and really isn’t cut out for politics other than using his money and no Democrat is going to ever let him hang out in the White House like Trump did..
Based Miller. But even worse than being a rounding error when it comes to national politics, they are radically insistent on their ideology on a level that approaches full blown Maoism. If you listen to (some) libertarian or anarchist types, they will insist fervently on the idea that America must have no borders because "putting someone in a cage for crossing an imaginary line" is nonsensical. If we gave libertarians exactly what they wanted, some things I do want (full deregulation of firearms, for example) everything would almost immediately proceed to go down the drain. As hordes of browns from central and south America would pour in inevitably if there were no consequences, nor borders at all. These people who do NOT at all care about freedom as an abstract concept would then proceed to quickly and forcibly establish a big government, welfare state that would enact every single nightmare policy that libertarians, conservatives and normal people fear. And of course when you mention this, lololbertarians/anarchists will insist with visible confusion "b-b-but we abolished the state!!11" The old debate between Lauren Southern and Larken Rose comes to mind.
Exceedingly based. Calling the Lolberts for what they are. Idiots. Useful idiots. They bitch and moan but do nothing but get in the way
i mean libtards are usually overweight karens
He's allowing people to volunteer to be on a list of people who say "nigger" on Twitter.
The UK already has Islamic Sharia "consultants" walking around harassing people for not obeying the rules of Islam in neighborhoods, and they have a de-facto secondary court system set up that they don't let Native British talk about becuase acknowledging the problem is the first step in fixing a problem and they don't want that. Britain is being ethnically cleansed as punishment for Brexit, after all.
The only thing that saves the Democrats from their upcoming civil war and implosion thanks to Obama (tweedledee) and Clinton (tweedledumber) is the GOP having their own collapse. Which becomes more and more likely the more and more the Uniparty finds it necessary to save the Uniparty's interests.
