You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.
He's just ego coping that he can "say the magic words and make the problem go away" (quote from one of his manic pre-sentencing streams).
In truth, his legal theories are retarded and rely upon hyper-technicalities. Fortunately, the court always sees through his charade and apply common sense direction.
they were working with more complex or simply more particular, tailored, HRO’s. The one Aaron got in place is a prima facie HRO. It’s a boiler plate, here’s what’s up, ok- here’s basic protection (because on its face that sounds reasonable,) type of document. Comparing that to a detailed HRO or possibly one in a line of other HRO’s that’s been tailored to the specifics isn’t a fair comparison.
In case it may save some time, there's no need to speculate on whether the no-mention verbiage that Ashley successfully obtained and that Aaron unsuccessfully requested would or would not be "standard" because the boilerplate forms used as a starting point in those cases are both available online for comparison. For starters, Aaron's ex parte HRO last week was clearly a fill-in-the-blanks exercise using Form HAR802 with no significant changes:
This makes sense because, unlike some larger counties that may have a dedicated courtroom set up for an on-call "signing judge" for various urgent ex parte matters who would sometimes meet with a petitioner and ask a few clarifying questions for a few minutes, smaller counties like Stearns would tend to simply take the petition back into chambers for a perfunctory rubber-stamped form order based on a quick skim of the petition, in the course of which, for all we know, even the best of judges could have simply missed the single "no online mentions" request that Aaron's pro se drafting improvidently tucked away in one somewhat inapposite paragraph without hammering it home in a more attention-getting spot. In that scenario, his "no online mentions" request could simply never be thought through, unless Nick puts the nitrous canister down soon enough for a timely response by July 17th and triggers a hearing to customize a final order further to his detriment, or unless Aaron files a motion to modify the ex parte order on his own in the event of an outright default that Nick can still opt for if he knows what's good for him.
In contrast, Ashley's HRO issued upon a requested hearing was explicitly modeled on Form HAR803 as a starting point before extensive customization:
This also makes sense because of peculiarities of the case at bar with a respondent whose brash online persona and whose live show's interaction with a superchatter generated the alleged harassment in the first place, and especially because the parties settled the case by mutual stipulation rather than a contested hearing, which any judge would always tend to encourage with some leeway about using a highly customized proposed order drafted by the parties' attorneys, even if it included some provisions that would have stood out as extraordinary in the run of cases.
Leaving aside Aaron's non-RO pretrial release conditions as to a victim in a criminal case (which should already scream apples to oranges on its face before even getting into how it stems from Aaron's attorney's abysmal failure to object to its arguably unconstitutional breadth), we haven't actually seen anything indicating that a final HRO in a contested posture would get anywhere near Aaron's "no online mentions" request that would be an extraordinary customization to the unique circumstances here at best or unconstitutionally overbroad at worst. On that note, just to add to @Himedall All-seeing Waifu's crucial appellate-level examples that can understandably get one's hopes up, here's an illustrative example of how judges in the district-level trenches nestled in the warm blanket of an abuse-of-discretion standard could end up extensively customizing Form HAR903 if Aaron doesn't fucking lawyer upfor a slightly better shot against all the limitless Petrofac-bux that Nick's inner child's petulant ODD rage is hellbent on throwing at this circus' equivalent of a schoolteacher taking away his Transformers toy:
You're both wrong: surely poor handwriting obfuscated his intent to say "farmer friend," in that he and Nick both read this thread so obsessively as to both be honorary farmers, no matter how much one of them pretends to have quit cold turkey for "three weeks." Oh come on, Aaron, we get it that you have to play dumb for obvious legal reasons, but nobody's buying it.
It's really pathetic that Nick is acting suave and cool, and yet he can't go anywhere in the real world with his "friends" without getting kicked out or ostracized.
It's really pathetic that Nick is acting suave and cool, and yet he can't go anywhere in the real world with his "friends" without getting kicked out or ostracized.
My understanding is that Nick and Kayla rolled up to Stoney’s with not just Melton but a gaggle of obese Melton fans. There is CCTV footage of what happened and I would expect it to land here imminently.
DSP is so much worse than Aaron (basically the same flaws but worsened), and yet Aaron seems to really get the many obsessive hate watchers, because of the dabbleverse streamers being obsessed.
Can someone please remind Cheetos why there are zero legal consequences to forking that over? If it's just a matter of the bounty, name a price already or it's all talk.
Can someone please remind Cheetos why there are zero legal consequences to forking that over? If it's just a matter of the bounty, name a price already or it's all talk.
Aaron should get his lawyer to file a challenge to his plea conditions, something to the effect that Kayla, specifically, is using it to harrass him - it won't succeed, but would 100% cause Nick to lose his shit in the best way possible.
No, this section is just clarifying the scope of the HRO is for Aaron. The next tick box is for 'minor children' or other dependents. Thr judge denied the HRO applying to thr children becuase Nick has bot directly harassed them in the scope of evidence provided in Aaron's complain.
It’s months since I’ve read the Ashley thread, which I regularly read back in the heyday of Balldoverse Collapse sub forum, & from what I recall, they were working with more complex or simply more particular, tailored, HRO’s. The one Aaron got in place is a prima facie HRO. It’s a boiler plate, here’s what’s up, ok- here’s basic protection (because on its face that sounds reasonable,) type of document. Comparing that to a detailed HRO or possibly one in a line of other HRO’s that’s been tailored to the specifics isn’t a fair comparison.
You have to take step 1 before step 2, & I don’t know if you have to get the prima facie HRO first, before getting a tailor made one, but that’s not the point of this discussion, nor has it been. Yet. Since online & social media harassment is common in this situation, (in the legal sense, not my opinion necessarily) I think the next step would be to get an HRO tailor made to keep Nicks faggotry far from Aaron. Not counting on that because whenever there’s been a reasonable option offered up, for the duration of this fallout so far, those involved usually go for the stupidest options.
Aaron described being served with the packet of papers we all see and reference today. How April was upset about the texts and stuff ashley claims she said (denied it when she was served). I don’t think there was prima facie HRO with ashley.
Aaron didn’t fight ashley on it either. Nick has gone into detail about how he was telling Aaron to fight it but Aaron didn’t want the legal fees at that time so he (they- April has one too from ashley) just accepted the HRO and planned to wait it out.
Aaron should get his lawyer to file a challenge to his plea conditions, something to the effect that Kayla, specifically, is using it to harrass him - it won't succeed, but would 100% cause Nick to lose his shit in the best way possible.
Kayla was in the hotel room off camera with Patrick and Nick where they were talking in depth about the case, and making fun of Aaron the same night of the hearing.
I know this was a very serious post. Alarming even, but this part of your comment made me laugh a little.
What local "aggressive lesbian" is Nick harassing and for what possible reason?
We know a lot about his community atp. It's doubtful it would be someone from the Evangelical church, the Christian school or coop, Kayla's family, or the dance school. Outside chance it's one of the women in the chiropractor's office but doubtful. That left me with this:
Perhaps it's someone from one of the local bars. Willmar VFW 1639 with their fun karoke nights?
One of the social workers in his CPS case whom he disparaged? But I have to believe that these jobs have built-in protections.
The local theater community might have some lesbian participation.
Then I remembered that he's been banned from the County offices. Am I remembering that right? That made me think.
Anyway, this is just idle speculation and unimportant. I hope she's okay.
