Cheese_lad
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2025
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can understand that yet you can't understand how admitting to that invalidates your previous argument?Yup. We have an adversarial legal system. Shooting people is contentious. You know what's not contentious? Jerking off to kids.
Looked it up, no adult woman talks like this.
Yeah, she's appealing to lolicons.
Because playing a video game doesn't make you a killer. Jerking off to children does make you a pedophile however.
So your point dies immediately because Pekora says she is in her 20s
A kinda related question: Does being a furry make you zoophile or more likely to rape animals?
people need the right to protect themselves from violence; they don't need a right to jerk off to child porn. that's retarded and irrelated to the real life needs of humans and rightslolbert niggerfaggotism
Rittenhouse got out because he had a solid legal argument from the get go. Your argument is asinine. Are you arguing that laws protecting children from obscene material are bad because sometimes the "wrong" person gets put away?How many times did people end up in prison despite being, in your framework, shooting the "wrong person" because there are retarded laws regarding the proportionality of retaliation? Rittenhouse wasn't ages ago, and he only managed to barely make it out because he became a cause celebre and nearly every single sane policymaker got behind him and raised enough capital for his legal defense? How many people didn't have as much support and ended up in prison?
Who said anything about child porn?people need the right to protect themselves from violence; they don't need a right to jerk off to child porn. that's retarded and irrelated to the real life needs of humans and rights
It is inevitible. The pipeline is unbreakable. First its porn. Then child abuse.ot something I have refuted or attempted to. I'm just asking where the line is. Null's statement that started this set of responses was about crossing the line into reality.
Enjoying a video game doesn't make your a killer but it does make your someone who revels in violence. Jacking it to a depiction of a child makes you a pedo, but does it make you a child molester?
Simple question.
No. I'm not arguing. Guns have valid uses which are inherently contentious. Pedophilia has no valid uses. It is a problem, one solution to which is guns.You can understand that yet you can't understand how admitting to that invalidates your previous argument?
His "solid legal argument" was that he received the backing of nearly every single name in firearm media sphere with the exception of those worthless goyim at BRCC, a massive legal fund, and the attention of a presidential candidate. Look up how many people have been locked up for defending themselves because they were in the wrong state and their laws regarding proportionality of retaliation are retarded there.Rittenhouse got out because he had a solid legal argument from the get go. Your argument is asinine.
Please point where exactly I wrote anything the sort, without having to strawman from what I've actually written.Are you arguing that laws protecting children from obscene material are bad because sometimes the "wrong" person gets put away?
Yeah but i have the feeling it is kinda pointless.I like you. You ask the fun questions.
You're using one clip of Marine speaking English. She sounds like a normal woman. Should also add that Marine has huge tits and does not look like a child.Pitching up is a common thing in Vtubing. Is Marine here appealing to pedos?
Money doesn't win cases. The facts do. You are disingenuous.His "solid legal argument" was that he received the backing of nearly every single name in firearm media sphere with the exception of those worthless goyim at BRCC, a massive legal fund, and the attention of a presidential candidate. Look up how many people have been locked up for defending themselves because they were in the wrong state and their laws regarding proportionality of retaliation are retarded there.
I have a IQ above room temperature, i understand what this gun argument is about NIGGER.Please point where exactly I wrote anything the sort, without having to strawman from what I've actually written.
The ones that are into drawn feral (non-humanoid) animal porn, yesA kinda related question: Does being a furry make you zoophile or more likely to rape animals?
Statistics would say otherwise in regards to the drawings given Japan is the root of a lot of the loli/shota stuff.It is inevitible. The pipeline is unbreakable. First its porn. Then child abuse.
You will never convince someone who doesn't want to be convinced. Just have fun with it. I am.I forgot. Arguing with lolicons is pointless. They know that jacking off to animated children is abnormal and wrong, they simply don't care. These people act smug and present the exact same arguments over and over again just to save face.
This is pointless. There is no "winning" an argument against a pedophile.
And repeating it here... Does it need a point? Arguments are fun. Ask the fun questions and see what happens. It's mental exercise.Yeah but i have the feeling it is kinda pointless.
While i agree that guns do have a point and an armed society is a safer society, our politicians didnt think so and made acquiring guns harder for the commen men because one dude shot up a school.
First example I could think of, and forgot Marine's pitch is all over the place.You're using one clip of Marine speaking English. She sounds like a normal woman. Should also add that Marine has huge tits and does not look like a child.
You and Proctor owe me an apology for the shit i deal with every fucking day with these freaks.
Why do you have all these clips of this specific VTuber saying that she's horny memorized?But it did remind me of another.