US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
California banned the BDS movement and Newsom ran to Tel Aviv within days of October 7th.

And you saw Biden refusing to disarm or defy Bibi during his term.

With liberals and zionisms and the ADL and bolshevik Israeli hating kikes in their party, it's quite a melting pot that the Democrats have.
Honestly it's less of a melting pot and more of a circus tent being pulled in every direction by every different political faction all at once.
 
It will never happen. NEPO Babies use those loans to start their careers. I personally know quite a few people that did this. Obligatory I am not saying anyone should do this because you can get in trouble for doing certain things with it.

You see, there's no real auditing to student loans. So as long as you maintain the minimum class requirement to be classified as a student, it doesn't really matter what you do with the rest of the money. You can take out loans for a full year, sign up for 1-2 online classes, be classified as a student and start businesses. Its not the best strategy but if you don't want to deal with investors, or are simply a nobody, it's an easy way to get started while accruing some credits.
How does that possibly work? I just checked the Federal Loans stuff I could find and it says the max you can borrow in a year is about $10k. You can't really start a business on that kind of money, can you?
 
dude the college litterally go beyond codling students all the incentives are to not fail students that why we re flooded with bullshit degrees.

i d have more faith in someone whose watch 300 hours of youtube videos/lectures on a topic than most degree people
Uhh Ok……I have no idea what that has to do with what I was talking about but yeah I pretty much agree.
 
Trump speaks on the NYC Zorhan mayoral race:
I spent some time going over Zohrans platform with my political fren. We both tore it to shreds and said it was legally, politically, financially and pragmatically unfeasible.

Dude has never held a legit financial job before and has zero idea how systems or politics work. Id call his political opinions, immature, myopic at best, if not downright retarded and destructive. Whats strange to me is that his ideas all look like they came out of 2020 and are 5 years behind on the pulse of the nation.

He wants to "Trump-proof" NYC by blocking ICE and making the city a tranny haven that allows hospitals to chop up children's genitals; which Trump can just respond by turning off the federal gibs money. NYC and the state may sue but the courts are conservative and will side with Trump. The subway is already shit and is a few elections cycles away from being unusable, theres nothing about his platform to address that. Additionally he also wants to replace police with community workers which is strange because this was tried after the Floyd riots with a resounding failure.

The state childcare is horrific and will lead to abuse rates skyrocketing. Imagine having your city clerk or DMV employee operate a daycare. As for his city run grocery stores, its obvious Zohran has never taken an econ 101 course in his life. Grocery margins are razor thin and the majority of food prices are out of the cities control.

As for his rent policies, its a misguided attempt at the skyrocketing rent. I will say, the city does need to crack down on luxury apartments being built in for more middle class affordable options, but freezing the rent is not going to combat inflation. Crackdowns on large corporations, and private equity like Blackrock, and their subsidiaries from owning apartments for profit would do more to alleviate the inflation in the short to medium term.

Cuomo lost because he is a tired establishment hack that killed old people during covid. NYC has not forgotten that.
 
Randolph Moss, an Obama-appointed judge, just issued an order OVERTURNING Trump's declaration of invasion at the southern border.

This activist judge wants to turn the US into the Biden-era open border disaster.

Archive of the legal document in attachments.

1.webp

In other news, 20 Democrat-led states are SUING the Trump administration after the DHS was given Medicaid data to ensure that illegal aliens are not receiving Medicaid benefits.

Archive of the legal document is also in attachments.

2.webp
3.webp
4.webp
5.webp
 

Attachments

Randolph Moss, an Obama-appointed judge, just issued an order OVERTURNING Trump's declaration of invasion at the southern border.

This activist judge wants to turn the US into the Biden-era open border disaster.

Archive of the legal document in attachments.

View attachment 7590007

In other news, 20 Democrat-led states are SUING the Trump administration after the DHS was given Medicaid data to ensure that illegal aliens are not receiving Medicaid benefits.

Archive of the legal document is also in attachments.

View attachment 7590032
View attachment 7590027
View attachment 7590028
View attachment 7590029
Alto pretty much called it:

1751486006343.webp1751486019809.webp

Trump needs to just ignore this shit and say he listens to the Supreme Court Rulings.
 
Dude has never held a legit financial job before and has zero idea how systems or politics work. Id call his political opinions, immature, myopic at best, if not downright retarded and destructive. Whats strange to me is that his ideas all look like they came out of 2020 and are 5 years behind on the pulse of the nation.
He won the primary because he's active enough on social media to know that saying something to the effect of "I will give you guys endless free shit" is enough to get the people of new york to go with you. It's hilarious how people like him will bitch and moan about the US debt crisis but want to dump gorillions into subsidized rent and social programs that don't help people advance in life.
 
Who can expect someone to work hard and put in effort if they get nothing in return, at best barely able to keep going paycheck-to-paycheck?

The COVID bullshit was the biggest upward transfer of wealth probably in all of recorded history. The wealthy continue to prosper at the expense of everyone else - this is no longer remotely a situation where a rising tide lifts all boats.
What's annoying about it all is that the solution, as I see it, does require some sort of coming together of the political opposition to implement policies and take action that both sides find unsavoury to their principles when they're in power, but they will utterly dismiss any idea to do so.

For example, prior to WW1 the Liberals in the UK (our "left-wing" party prior to Labour as you're probably familiar with) operated on cutting spending in some areas to increase it in other areas (social stuff), which largely just translated to slashing the military budget. But as Germany began building Dreadnoughts to counter the UK's own Dreadnoughts in the leadup to the first world war, they pumped billions into military spending to make sure our navy couldn't be overwhelmed. Meanwhile Jeremy Corbyn (Labour candidate in the 2017 and 2019 GE) couldn't even say the words "Yes, I would" in reply to the question: "Would you fire nukes back at a country who nuclear bombs our country?"

The necessity of certain unsavoury actions in spite of what you hold to be your principles is something some people seem incapable of considering, even if they recognise it to be to their own detriment to not do so.

The Left needs to let go of its pro-immigration sentiments since the mass import of immigrants was the explicit cause between wage decreases (serving corporate interests ironically) and house price increases (which in turn affect rents, which take the largest chunk out of a working class person's pay check). They also need to abandon their retarded and selective green policies (increase energy costs to harm everybody, force offshoring for cheaper production costs which in turn takes away jobs, and with fewer jobs and many jobless wages are justifiably stagnant), and contentious social policies that ultimately do more harm than good (trans kids will enable the idea of kids being able to consent to sex, alongside every push for selective uplifting of minority groups will just keep breeding resentment). Also the way they apply regulations on a macroscale without any differentiation between small and big businesses is also in service to the billionaire/investor class since those people and companies can eat the costs of those regulations, whereas they strangle smaller businesses or abort them before they can ever grow or even be born to begin with.

The Right meanwhile needs to let go of larping, copes/naivety, and boomer mentalities.

One such mentality is that any opposition to corporations is inherently communistic, making any attempts to implement consumer protections, regulations, or intervene as anathema just because. Just look at the two groups of people opposed to StopKillingGames initiative if you want an example of what I mean. (Furries and Libertarians)

The free market and corporations aren't infallible, and I'd even argue that a free market can only really exist with restriction of operation America's roaring 20s were experienced at a time with little restriction but very high tariffs, protecting domestic businesses whilst ensuring outsiders couldn't intrude on the market largely. Meanwhile at the height of the Cold War the West had its market (consumer base, workers and manufacturing) confined to largely just NATO and its friends, operating in much the same way the Empires of old had, with industries and goods being imported from one country to another within its confines, benefiting both ends of the arrangement (manufacturer and seller). The world was technically their oyster for where they could conduct business but implicitly they were restricted to operating purely out of the safe Western, capitalist bloc. Throw China into said market with it's 0 regulation, poverty-tier wages, and a government that can directly act to ensure they remain the most tempting option, and you get the equivalent of a fat person having a plate full of Big Macs slid in front of them ("Moderate portion of food," as MovieBob would say) - the grumbling of fiduciary responsibility obliges corporations to offshore.

If you want to return to the boomer-era, you'd need to completely isolate China from the equation (and India too) which would require some protectionism and co-ordination with other Western countries (hopefully avoiding a sort of prisoner's dilemma). Implementing a conservative fiscal policy would only be to the country's detriment so long as China can continue to yuck it up and the economy simply can't grow. If you want to see what that looks like, check out the first term of the British Conservative party after they got elected in 2010. Budgets were balanced, austerity introduced, and business incentives were put in place - nothing good happened.

There was a reason why the West all suffered mass unemployment, massive spending, huge inflation of debt, and mass immigration in the 80s - it was a response and attempted mitigation to the damage caused by China.
It's comical how the start and end date of who is considered a 'zoomer' keeps getting wound backwards as time winds on...

give it ten years and it'll be 1985-2000 for 'gen z'.
You might be thinking of gen alpha. If anything I made the date range smaller.
1751480585624.webp
 
Last edited:
Cities Have Turned Their Roads Into an LGBTQ Statement. The Trump Admin Is Doing Something About It.
The Daily Signal (archive.ph)
By Tyler O'Neil
2025-07-02 00:13:25GMT
FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL—Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy sent a letter Tuesday to the 50 state governors, urging them to remove distractions from roads, including divisive and distracting political messaging like rainbow crosswalks.

“Roads are for safety, not political messages or artwork,” Duffy said in a statement first provided to The Daily Signal. “Today I am calling on governors in every state to ensure that roadways, intersections, and crosswalks are kept free of distractions.”

“Far too many Americans die each year to traffic fatalities to take our eye off the ball,” the secretary added. The Transportation Department “stands ready to help communities across the country make their roads safer and easier to navigate.”

In the letter, first provided to The Daily Signal, Duffy asks governors to ensure that their states take part in the Federal Highway Administration’s Safe Arterials for Everyone through Reliable Operations and Distraction-Reducing Strategies, or SAFE ROADS, initiative. The letter went to the mayor of Washington, D.C., and the governor of Puerto Rico, in addition to all state governors.

The letter notes that an estimated 39,345 people died on American roads in 2024, a decrease of 3.8% from 2023, but an “unacceptable” number, nonetheless.

“The SAFE ROADS national initiative will focus on the non-freeway arterials within your state, including safety and operation at intersections and along segments, consistent and recognizable traffic control devices including crosswalk and intersection markings, and orderly use of the right-of-way that is kept free from distractions,” the transportation secretary’s letter states. “These routes are where more than half of roadway fatalities in America occur and deserve enhanced attention.”

Duffy asks that “within 60 days” each state’s department of transportation “develop a list of arterial segments, including intersections, with the highest safety, operational, or compliance concerns that will be addressed by the end of Fiscal Year 2026” (from Oct. 1, 2025, to Sept. 30, 2026). He asks state departments to submit these lists to the Federal Highway Administration’s office in each state.

“With our shared goals of moving people and goods safely and efficiently, we can make the expectation that all Americans make it home safely and on-time a reality,” Duffy concludes.

In recent years, some cities have added painted crosswalks in rainbow colors to express solidarity with the LGBTQ+ movement.

West Hollywood, California, established a rainbow crosswalk at the intersection of Santa Monica and San Vicente in 2012, and San Francisco followed in 2014 with one at the intersection of 18th Street and Castro.

Philadelphia established one at 13th Street and Locust in 2015, and Atlanta painted one at Piedmont and 10th Street in 2015. Milwaukee, Wisconsin, recently repainted its rainbow crosswalk, which had first gone up in 2018 but temporarily disappeared when the road got resurfaced following construction.

Seattle has painted at least 11 rainbow crosswalks. Chicago has painted at least three. New York City painted one outside the Stonewall Inn, the site of the 1969 riot that activists call the beginning of the LGBTQ+ movement. Old Town Alexandria, Virginia, outside Washington, D.C., painted an LGBTQ+ “Pride” flag on the road last year.

Conservative-leaning states are not immune. Key West, Florida, has an intersection with four rainbow crosswalks. Huntington, West Virginia, established a rainbow crosswalk last year, as did Nashville, Tennessee.

In 2011, the Federal Highway Administration ruled that crosswalk art is “contrary to the goal of increased safety and most likely could be a contributing factor to a false sense of security for both motorists and pedestrians.” Crosswalk art makes the white lines of a crosswalk harder to distinguish from the pavement beneath it, the administration ruled.

The Federal Highway Administration urged Ames, Iowa, to remove its rainbow crosswalk due to safety concerns in 2019, but the city refused.

“Crosswalk art has a potential to compromise pedestrian and motorist safety by interfering with, detracting from, or obscuring official traffic control devices,” the administration wrote. “The art can also encourage road users, especially bicycles and pedestrians, to directly participate in the design, loiter in the street, or give reason to not vacate the street in an expedient or predictable manner.”
https://www.dailysignal.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/20250701-Signed-Letter-Sean-Duffy.pdf (archive.org)
 

Attachments

Back