- Joined
- Apr 6, 2014
Exactly. It isn't actually "Libertarian" according to their beliefs. Its tactically done only when they think it'll benefit them and ignored with it doesn't. I use the term "Lolbertarian" not as a derogatory term for Libertarians in general, but for the ones who promote untenable and unpersuasive ideas in defense of corporate mega giants. Things like "free speech is secondary to a corporation's ability to run their own platform" etc. The braindead shit that is impossible to take seriously. Mentioning consumer rights to them makes them scratch their heads, but big corpos heavily linked to the government are allowed to do whatever they want all the time.Only a dumbass nigger would cry about one bully fighting another over a perpetual license issue.
We don't even "own" the shit that the government is trying to regulate here. No one is coming to tell us what cars we can purchase or how many sex dolls we can own. Taking an attempt to reign in grey-area EULA-bullying, and equating it to private property encroachment from the state is a reallibertarianbrain-dead take.
I think Americans are probably the most vocal opponents of SKG. Which is shocking, because the ones fucking us up the ass here are corporations, not their lapdogs (the government). Make it make sense!
Businesses have rights, but so do consumers. And consumers have a right to use the means they have available to defend and enforce those rights as they see fit.
A good example, I think, of the industry self-regulating is the ESRB. If politicians like Joe Lieberman had their way, the government would have outlawed "obscene" video games or treated them like contraband ala booze and cigarettes. But because the industry stepped up and made their own solution, they were able to avoid all of that trouble. Big companies could do the same by having some kind of industry-wide archival project dedicated to preserving games, or simply have ESRB regulations for companies to explicitly tell customers about end-of-life plans for games and potential other ways to operate their software.
They have haven't done that because they haven't seen a need. So, the only logical next step is to create a need.