Science Tiny gut “sponge” bacteria found to flush out toxic PFAS “forever chemicals” - Cambridge scientists have spotted gut bacteria that soak up PFAS in animal tests, removing up to three-quarters of the toxins within minutes.

ScienceDaily (archive.today)
2 Jul 2025 20:16:19 UTC

1751487990045.webp

Scientists have discovered that certain species of microbe found in the human gut can absorb PFAS -- the toxic and long-lasting 'forever chemicals.' They say boosting these species in our gut microbiome could help protect us from the harmful effects of PFAS.​


PFAS have been linked with a range of health issues including decreased fertility, developmental delays in children, and a higher risk of certain cancers and cardiovascular diseases.

Scientists at the University of Cambridge have identified a family of bacterial species, found naturally in the human gut, that absorb various PFAS molecules from their surroundings. When nine of these bacterial species were introduced into the guts of mice to 'humanise' the mouse microbiome, the bacteria rapidly accumulated PFAS eaten by the mice -- which were then excreted in faeces.

The researchers also found that as the mice were exposed to increasing levels of PFAS, the microbes worked harder, consistently removing the same percentage of the toxic chemicals. Within minutes of exposure, the bacterial species tested soaked up between 25% and 74% of the PFAS.

The results are the first evidence that our gut microbiome could play a helpful role in removing toxic PFAS chemicals from our body -- although this has not yet been directly tested in humans.

The researchers plan to use their discovery to create probiotic dietary supplements that boost the levels of these helpful microbes in our gut, to protect against the toxic effects of PFAS.

The results are published today in the journal Nature Microbiology.

PFAS (Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances) can't be avoided in our modern world. These man-made chemicals are in many everyday items including waterproof clothing, non-stick pans, lipsticks and food packaging, used for their resistance to heat, water, oil and grease. But because they take thousands of years to break down, they are accumulating in large quantities in the environment - and in our bodies.

Dr Kiran Patil, in the University of Cambridge's MRC Toxicology Unit and senior author of the report, said: "Given the scale of the problem of PFAS 'forever chemicals', particularly their effects on human health, it's concerning that so little is being done about removing these from our bodies."

"We found that certain species of human gut bacteria have a remarkably high capacity to soak up PFAS from their environment at a range of concentrations, and store these in clumps inside their cells. Due to aggregation of PFAS in these clumps, the bacteria themselves seem protected from the toxic effects."

Dr Indra Roux, a researcher at the University of Cambridge's MRC Toxicology Unit and a co-author of the study said: "The reality is that PFAS are already in the environment and in our bodies, and we need to try and mitigate their impact on our health now. We haven't found a way to destroy PFAS, but our findings open the possibility of developing ways to get them out of our bodies where they do the most harm."

There is increasing concern about the environmental and health impacts of PFAS, and in April 2025 the UK launched a parliamentary inquiry into their risks and regulation.

There are over 4,700 PFAS chemicals in widespread use. Some get cleared out of the body in our urine in a matter of days, but others with a longer molecular structure can hang around in the body for years.

Dr Anna Lindell, a researcher at the University of Cambridge's MRC Toxicology Unit and first author of the study said: "We're all being exposed to PFAS through our water and food - these chemicals are so widespread that they're in all of us.

"PFAS were once considered safe, but it's now clear that they're not. It's taken a long time for PFAS to become noticed because at low levels they're not acutely toxic. But they're like a slow poison."

Lindell and Patil have co-founded a startup, Cambiotics, with serial entrepreneur Peter Holme Jensen to develop probiotics that remove PFAS from the body, and they are investigating various ways of turbo-charging the microbes' performance. Cambiotics is supported by Cambridge Enterprise, the innovation arm of the University of Cambridge, which helps researchers translate their work into globally-leading economic and social impact.

While we wait for new probiotics to become available, the researchers say the best things we can do to help protect ourselves against PFAS are to avoid PFAS-coated cooking pans, and use a good water filter.

Story Source:
Materials provided by University of Cambridge. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
 
Open access paper from Nature Microbiology (archive). The best accumulators are Bacteroides (stinky anaerobes). The Proterobacteria (E. coli and friends) are not doing it very well; the researchers find out that E. coli actively pumps PFAS out of their cells.
 
Really interesting.
Lindell and Patil have co-founded a startup, Cambiotics,
Caveat: commercial interest. But frankly i would also have a startup if I’d found this.
I feel like we're gonna figure out in the next decade or so that half the problems plagueing society are caused by either poor gut health or parasitic infections. I remember reading something a while ago that some person with autism got a fecal transplant from someone without autism and his autism went away, but he did end up having depression afterwards and it turned out the donor had clinically diagnosed depression.
Yup. Gut health is vital. Fatty acid metabolism is part of autism manifestation. Gut health hits everything. This B uniformis type is also involved in reducing colitis type inflammation and in glucose sensitivity and all sorts of stuff, including that short chain fatty acid metabolism. Eat your yoghurt daily.
Maybe we could find a way to not use these things and make the alternatives and cheaper for the average person? Could that be a viable option?
lol no, you, the pleb, will swim in a sea of toxic waste while the elite drink Fiji water out of glass bottles
i wonder if these are going to be injected like a pre-redefined definition of vaccine
Just eaten in enteric coated capsules probably, but you can probably increase them with their favourite foods which are the soluble plant fibres like pectin and all that sort of stuff. (Shock horror unprocessed plant material is good for you, I know!) Apples, ground flaxseed, just any starchy non processed stuff will do. They also love breast milk so feed those babies!
 
Joke’s on you I can buy Fiji water at my local gas stations. I guess I am one of the elite. I’ma go build my underground bunker now, while you eat ze bugs. :tomgirl:
Best things are just to try to reduce exposure. Don’t cook in non stick, don’t use non stuck anything, including baking paper. Make sure it’s pfas free. Use rhe old fashioned stuff. Reduce plastic as much as is practical. Wash all new clothes before wear. Don’t use plastic wrap if you can use an alternative. Steel water bottles (but be aware that most insulated ones have a lead solder used.)
 
Best things are just to try to reduce exposure. Don’t cook in non stick, don’t use non stuck anything, including baking paper. Make sure it’s pfas free. Use rhe old fashioned stuff. Reduce plastic as much as is practical. Wash all new clothes before wear. Don’t use plastic wrap if you can use an alternative. Steel water bottles (but be aware that most insulated ones have a lead solder used.)
I'm going to do everything opposite of what you just said. The more forever chemicals I have in me the longer I will stay alive! I know you're just lying to get me to not collect all them sweet pfas. I know you're Klause!
 
Maybe we could find a way to not use these things and make the alternatives and cheaper for the average person? Could that be a viable option?
Cheaper? Probably not, they are actually a by product of something thats somewhat hard to make. My impression is the manufacturing process is very irresponsible.
 
I feel like we're gonna figure out in the next decade or so that half the problems plagueing society are caused by either poor gut health or parasitic infections. I remember reading something a while ago that some person with autism got a fecal transplant from someone without autism and his autism went away, but he did end up having depression afterwards and it turned out the donor had clinically diagnosed depression.

IMG_7758.webp
 
Sounds like the microplastics scare is another environmental psyop that’s going to be forgotten in a decade, if this is true.
There's a few harbors in the USA that are slowly cleaning themselves up of all the waste that has been dumped in them thanks to plastic-eating bacteria showing up. In a few hundred years the Chesapeake might be plastic-free, assuming we can give those tiny buggers a little help. If we can take care of the big items they'll take care of the small ones.
 
A black, nature and physicality defying resource that bubbles up out of earth, cooked from living things of an antique and un-historic past. Who could have known that it was poisonous????
> believing muh dead dinosaurs lie instead of assuming oil isn't created by bacteria deep inside the earth's crust

How embarrassing.
 
I feel like we're gonna figure out in the next decade or so that half the problems plagueing society are caused by either poor gut health or parasitic infections. I remember reading something a while ago that some person with autism got a fecal transplant from someone without autism and his autism went away, but he did end up having depression afterwards and it turned out the donor had clinically diagnosed depression.
WTS redpilled but upbeat poop, easygoing with a side of based, 10K OBO
 
Maybe we could find a way to not use these things and make the alternatives and cheaper for the average person? Could that be a viable option?
We should go back to glass and paper packaging for most things.

Schills like to say it makes global oceanic trade uneconomical which to my mind is only a benefit as it would incentivize local logistics feeding local businesses over global trade networks
 
Gut bacteria take part in hormonal signalling and do half the work our stupid ass digestive system can't do. They also process bile salts and a lot of stuff so we can absorb it. It won't be long until we get actual plastic degradaing microbiota, the enzymes already exist in bacteria and we could transplant them.
 
I saw that, and I just full on don’t believe it.
I was wondering about why / how it could be. Mrs. Emoji thinks that it's microplastics mixed in the with silica/sand when making new glass, since very little is actually recycled. I don't know. Mrs. Emoji is also a bit of a doomer and is ready to believe the worst.
 
Archive
Recent study finds more micro plastics in glass than in plastic bottles, allegedly.
Consider me skeptical. Your article as about cognitive screenings in the army though, would you like to cite the relevant portion or did you link the wrong thing?
I was wondering about why / how it could be. Mrs. Emoji thinks that it's microplastics mixed in the with silica/sand when making new glass, since very little is actually recycled. I don't know. Mrs. Emoji is also a bit of a doomer and is ready to believe the worst.


Okay this actually makes sense nvm
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GloJojo
Back