Not sure if this was asked before in this thread but it is an interesting question shared around the community.
"If Ending C didnt exist as the convenient Hollywood ending where everyone lives with our bad guy protagonists defeating all of the slightly worse bad guy villains, which Ending would you pick? A or B? And why?"
Altho Ending C is the best gameplay wise, Ending A really felt like the one that would make logical sense. Now I know Trevor fans would defend him, saying he is loyal but lets face it...thats really it. Trevor is extremely unstable, prone to violence at the slightest provocation and will actively make a situation worse if he gets annoyed enough. And most Trevor fans dont really seem to understand that Trevor would never be their buddies IRL, at best they would be "Ron", whom he constantly bosses around and disrespects (and as far as I know, practically ruined his life by threaten to disembowl his wife, turning him into his bitch slave). Trevor respects power and people as fucked up as he is (even if not openly so) thats why he "cares" for Micheal and the crew, he knows deep down they are hardly any better than him. And people are also forgetting Trevor was 100% ok with letting the Triad kill Micheal after he got kidnapped by them AND he doesnt even try to warn Micheal of Franklin's plan to off him in Ending B, so much for the "loyal" Trevor, huh?
Nvm that some side missions have Trevor legit kidnapping people to sell them to a cult to be sacrificed.
There is certainly a level of schizo writing with Trevor as he is shown to be the worst and dysfunctional EVEN for the criminal game standards and yet the narrative wants us to believe he is this great sensitive guy deep down that just needs to be given a chance and be given loyalty back. And the less I talk about him killing Johnny the best, tho its more the fault of the writer's raging boner for GTA 4 than Trevor's but I digress.
As much as I "like" Trevor as a character, I also know he is awful for the standards of GTA protagonists (and we had Toni Cipriani, who blown up a whole neighborhood, killing only god knows how many innocents, all for some cash amount of an average mission) and thus if any of the leads had to go, it might as well be him since at least you can argue Franklin and Micheal are doing the world a favor by getting rid of him (while killing Micheal is really doing only Devon a favor and screw that) and given how miserable Trevor is, it may also be putting him out of his misery.
But what you think? Anyone here would go for Ending B? And why?
Apparently this guy has worked on this GTA:SA mod for 20 years, and still hasn't released it. He's now homeless, but still wants to release the mod? Wtf.
At this point, Rockstar might as well take it down but with a note that says "sort out your life, dude"
More rumors from the GTA VI rumor mill; only this time, it’s regarding the WANTED level system
View attachment 7541753
A lot of it feels like fixing whats not broken and not going after the actual problems with the wanted system.
Idk, I know some of this stuff was indeed in RDR2 but it also feels like some of it wouldnt "fit" in GTA. The wanted system always worked given its simplicity and what always seemed to vary was the competence/aggression of the cops and how to get rid of them.
It all sounds like it would be slow and cumbersome as GTA's gameplay loop tends to be much faster than that of RDR2.
I really hope that GTA 6 isnt going to try to fix whats not broken and try to add needless complexity (other words, needless fluff) to the formula. GTA 4 was able to give a world that felt more "alive" than 5's and its wanted system didnt have to re-invent the wheel.
If GTAVI has yoga with big booty Latinas, then that itself is worth the $80-$100 for the game.
Sorry, you gotta pay their "TrueLovers" (OnlyFans GTA equivalent) with Shark Cards first.
Pay up, consumer.
