Here is best attempt to summarize the key differences, @IsaACKRepentance:
I don't think they're "concentration camps," they're just more of the "kids in cages" holding facilities that were all the rage in Trump 1. They go there, get processed, and then deported.
No, those are prisons, where they are being held for the crime of illegal entry into the country. It's just the answer to shitlibs attempting to make it as expensive as possible to punish these criminals.
I would beg to differ on that statement. Most of them likely have jobs, but most gamers are extremely loyal to a few games. Gaming is an absurdly cheap hobby for most players once you get past the moderately steep initial investment into a system. Steam users played on average only 4 different games last year. Even if we assume that half the userbase is just bots and alts, that's still maybe 7 or 8 unique games played a year. And on top of that, of these few games, two thirds of the time played in games was spent on games that were over 8 years old. Most people are sitting in their creature comfort games (many of which are free to play!), maybe picking up a new title here and there. They're likely spending more on electricity than they are on flavor of the month games and the whole lineup of blockbuster games each year. Video gaming is absurdly cheap $/hour if you aren't chasing the tippy top of everything.
i use the term concentration camp very loosely, regardless my point still stands. Additionally, a large enough portion of the public views them as that so the consequences of building and allocating funding towards those facilities is still the same despite them not legally being classified as such.
My point is, most gamers have jobs that likely have medicare options of their own; they do not use medicaid.
I'm a really early zoomer (1997). While my family got broadband about the time I started using computers (2002) due to my dad playing online games, I knew friends in childhood who still had dialup until 2007-2009 or so. Cousins family finally switched in 2013, but they live rurally.
And how much are the average player spending on those games? F2P just means the first hit is free and if you really want to play the game you either need to spend actual money or dedicate absurd time grinding. Just because the only game someone played is genshin impact doesn't mean he hasn't sunk hundreds of dollars into the game over his playtime.
Yet through all the doomers I can see the rays of ravishing light and glory of burger suits as far as the eye can see.
A large enough portion of the public also thinks Trump is essentially Hitler and the rest of MAGA the KKK ready to murder every liberal at the drop of a hat, doesn't mean I'm going to cede them the stage so that they can set the narrative. Last I heard El Salvador is making another 2 or 3 prisons for us to put Mexico's and South America's worst of the worst into as well. Sometimes I wish we could go back to the old school corporal punishments, 50 lashes to the back and a brand on you somewhere to mark you as an enemy of America if you commit any crime as an illegal, then sent off to wherever. Would save everyone a lot of time and money, but that'd be considered "cruel and unusual" nowadays and be an optics nightmare, so we get to live with this weak shit.
Yeah, the /v/ NEET is probably not anywhere near a significant portion of the gamer population. Most people are going to have jobs in general.
It's going to vary quite a bit from player to player, with the minnow dolphin whale designations. Games like Genshin and World of Tanks where there's mechanical advantages to paying are going to have a lot more of the bigger spenders than other games that are almost completely cosmetic like OW2, CSGO, DOTA2, and to a moderate degree, LoL. Maybe my circles are just a bunch of cheap bastards, idk.
Given how anti-illegal Chavez was, the Right-leaning workers would bring things back to that kind of mindset if they start forming unions.
